Papers with RLVR
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing code sandboxes fail to provide accurate verification and efficiency under high-concurrency workloads. |
| Approach: | They propose a high-fidelity code verification system that provides sandbox feedback for RL training and evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system outperforms heuristic-matching baselines on LiveCodeBench and training stability on high-concurrency workloads. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) show that large language models enhance their reasoning abilities when trained with veriable signals. |
| Approach: | They propose a method for a problem-aware filtering system that maximizes learning efficiency by selecting tasks of intermediate difficulty. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves when trained with verifiable rewards, but training efficiency is bottleneck . the proposed model achieves +12% gains in less than half the training steps of standard GRPO . |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in mathematical reasoning typically rely on massive scale . yet, can strong reasoning capabilities be induced in small language models under extreme constraints? |
| Approach: | They train small language models with a single GPU for under 24 hours . they find that adapters unlock significant plasticity in standard instruction-tuned models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model training on a single GPU (48GB) achieves 40% Pass@1 on AIME 24 (an 11.1% improvement over baseline) the model training results show that the adapter capacity and initialization are critical factors. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing RLHF frameworks face inference bottlenecks and complexity barriers restricting their accessibility for newcomers. |
| Approach: | They propose an open-source RLHF framework that can be used to train large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves superior training efficiency with speedups ranging from 1.22 to 1.68 across different model sizes compared to state-of-the-art frameworks, while requiring significantly fewer lines of code for implementation. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances have improved the accuracy of medical visual question answering (Med-VQA) however, the high stakes nature of the medical domain has precipitated a shift towards interpretability and transparency of reasoning processes. |
| Approach: | They propose a reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards framework that rewards internal consistency and logical coherence. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework rewards internal consistency and logical coherence, and is highly versatile, the authors show. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Critic-free reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is a practical paradigm for aligning Large Language Models. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that stabilizes advantage estimation by combining prompt-local on-policy statistics with semantic-cluster-conditioned historical moments. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that RLVR improves training stability and performance compared to critic-based methods . compared with other approaches, RL VR improves in cold-start regimes with binary verifiers . |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing large reasoning models are limited by their closed nature and high API costs and safety issues. |
| Approach: | They propose to build a long CoT dataset with existing short CoT LLMs that are not trained for inference-time scaling. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves quality comparable to—or slightly below—R1 and is able to think longer and provide control over the thought budget to better manage the overthinking problem. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent methods supervise only the final answer accuracy using reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR). |
| Approach: | They propose to train search agents to search and reason over scientific papers and a factoid QA dataset with 60k biomedical paper abstracts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms non-RL retrieval baselines and is scalable and extendable to other scientific domains. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has recently advanced the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a method that incorporates partial solution prefixes from expert demonstrations to guide the policy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods outperform strong baselines, yielding faster convergence and a higher performance ceiling. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) methods exhibit limited exploration due to reliance on on-policy rollouts which are limited to the current policy’s distribution, resulting in narrow trajectory diversity. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that leverages the in-context learning capability of Large Reasoning Models to provide expert guidance using existing datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves RLVR performance and training stability on mathematical reasoning benchmarks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large reasoning models are typically trained using reinforcement learning with verifiable reward (RLVR) positive and negative self-generated rollouts are used to update the model's policy . positive samples sharpen existing correct reasoning patterns, while negative samples encourage exploration of new reasoning paths. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that allocates advantage signals to key tokens across different polarities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves the ability of large reasoning models to learn from their own generated rollouts. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation benchmarks for writing reward models are coarse-grained. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark and a fine-grained training framework to evaluate writing reward models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on various writing benchmarks and exhibits strong generalization. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models excel at code generation by learning from vast code corpora, but a fundamental semantic gap remains between training on textual patterns and the goal of functional correctness . reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) approaches are inefficient for establishing a well-aligned connection between the textual representation of code and its execution semantics. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel approach that integrates execution semantics alignment into the RLVR training pipeline for code generation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baseline training and RLVR and shows strong applicability across RL and LLMs. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has been effective on structured tasks, but its reliance on simple, rule-based verifiers creates a bottleneck. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that uses a generative verifier to provide soft, probabilistic rewards. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing models up to 10x their size and can be scalable and effective. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in reasoning-centric large language models (LLMs) have significantly expanded the performance boundaries of LLMs, showcasing the immense potential of reasoning-enhanced models. |
| Approach: | They propose an adaptive algorithm that injects ground-truth reasoning steps into roll-out trajectories to compensate for SLMs’ inherent weaknesses. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on mathematical reasoning and code-generation benchmarks confirm that G2RPO-A substantially outperforms vanilla GRPO. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled strong performance in long-form writing, but current training paradigms remain limited. |
| Approach: | They propose an Adaptive Curriculum Reinforcement Learning framework to advance long-form writing capabilities beyond SFT. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on 7B-scale writer models show that Writing-RL improves long-form writing performance over strong SFT baselines. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing RLVRs lack visual faithfulness due to text-dominated reasoning . a novel framework to reinforce visual focus during policy optimization is proposed . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to reinforce visual focus during policy optimization using visual attention compensation mechanism. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework exhibits better visual activation and superior performance in multimodal reasoning and visual-dependent tasks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to RLVR provide sparse supervision since reward arrives only after the full generation is complete. |
| Approach: | They propose a step-level reward system that extracts confidence and correctness and combines them into a Step Potential signal that explicitly estimates reasoning state at each step. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing methods on multiple benchmarks and improves accuracy while reducing response length. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Counter-arguments (CAs) are a good way to improve learners' critical thinking skills . however, it is difficult to provide every learner tailored feedback due to limited human resources and heavy workloads. |
| Approach: | They propose to annotate a dataset of 134 CAs annotated with 13 logical predicate questions and train a model with Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards to identify multiple logical interpretations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs on par with larger proprietary models. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Adaptive group-wise gradient clipping (AGGC) is a new approach to stabilize training of Large Language Models. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to stabilize gradient clipping by partitioning parameters into groups based on functional types and a time-dependent scheduling mechanism to balance exploration and convergence. |
| Outcome: | The proposed algorithm outperforms standard LoRA and achieves 72.93% accuracy . it can be integrated into existing pipelines with negligible overhead. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to RLVR train LMs based on their own on-policy responses and are constrained by the initial capability of LM. |
| Approach: | They propose an approach that hints LMs with their self-made mistakes without external guidance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms the normal group relative policy optimization and requires no external guidance. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is a promising approach for enhancing agentic search, but its performance is often hindered by reward sparsity . |
| Approach: | They propose a new research problem to improve the reward obtained per unit of exploration cost by using a system that decomposes long-horizon tasks into intermediate objectives and assigns process-level rewards to provide denser learning signals. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms strong baselines on several agentic search benchmarks and achieves comparable performance to that of advanced proprietary models. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) have gained significant attention due to their objective and verifiably verifier reward signals. |
| Approach: | They propose to exploit RLVR for alignment reversibility by using GRPO to reverse alignment with merely 64 harmful prompts without responses. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms fine-tuning and RLHF in reasoning and code generation tasks while maintaining general capabilities. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing attempts to unify large language models are limited to open-domain QA with fixed retrieval settings. |
| Approach: | They propose a general reinforcement learning framework that dynamically coordinates retrieval and reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing paradigms on open-domain QA, MMLU-Pro, medical, and mathematical reasoning tasks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) rely on static objective functions and rigid clipping strategies that misalign with the model’s evolving reasoning capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose to incorporate Power-Mean Policy Optimization (PMPO) and Feedback-Adaptive Clipping (FAC) to overcome limitations of static mechanisms. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on nine reasoning tasks show the proposed paradigm outperforms state-of-the-art methods. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in decision-making tasks where accuracy and reliable confidence estimates are essential. |
| Approach: | They propose a calibration-aware reinforcement learning formulation that directly adjusts decision-token probabilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model preserves RLVR’s accuracy level while mitigating overconfidence, reducing ECE scores up to 9 points. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has improved reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose an online pruning method that prunes rollouts while steering correct ones to enhance learning signals. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves average accuracy by +2.30 to +2.99 across GRPO and DAPO on Qwen-3 and LLaMA-3.2 models. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards and Reinforced Learning from internal feedback fail to benefit from test-time compute due to entropy collapse and the resulting loss of reasoning diversity. |
| Approach: | They propose a strategy that assigns each generated token a redistribution score and applies selective KL regularization to only the top 5% of tokens under this score. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on both RLVR and RLIF models on math reasoning benchmarks, showing that targeted entropy control at a vanishingly small subset of tokens is sufficient to sustain reasoning diversity and effective test-time scaling. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Experimental results show that LENS outperforms GRPO in delivering higher performance and faster convergence. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that purifies prompts by identifying and removing interference tokens and then transfers successful rollouts to supervise policy optimization on original noisy prompts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms GRPO in the real-world, with a 3.88% gain and speedup. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current outcome-centric verification paradigms neglect potential errors in the derivation process. |
| Approach: | They propose a process-aware RLVR training paradigm utilizing verifiers selected via **PRIME**. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms the baseline verification paradigm on AIME24, AIME25, and Beyond-AIME models. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Generative Reward Models have demonstrated that scaling the length of Chain-of-Thought reasoning enhances reliability of evaluation. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that reconfigures raw rationales into structured Breadth-CoT and Depth-Co T through a modular synthesis pipeline. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework surpasses open-source RMs by an average of 8.2%. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards are limited by the complexity of the problem and the complexity. |
| Approach: | They propose a theoretically-grounded dual-pronged optimization framework for reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards that compensates for gradient attenuation of high-confidence correct actions while utilizing entropy changes as computable indicators to stabilize excessive update magnitudes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework compensates for gradient attenuation of high-confidence correct actions while utilizing entropy changes as computable indicators to stabilize excessive update magnitudes. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reasoning-capable large language models (LLMs) have driven a major shift in artificial intelligence . these models generate long CoTs, capturing reasoning behaviors such as self-reflection, self-correction, and hypothesis testing. |
| Approach: | They propose a sample-efficient, two-stage training strategy to build reasoning LLMs . they "warm up" a model by distilling Long CoTs from a toy domain to acquire general reasoning skills . |
| Outcome: | The proposed training strategy outperforms existing models on a range of tasks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models respond even when prompts omit critical details or include misleading information, leading to hallucinations or reinforced misconceptions. |
| Approach: | They propose an interactive benchmark that converts standard QA pairs into multi-turn interactions with explicit checkpoints. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark improves accuracy, rubric adherence, and interaction efficiency with strong generalization to unseen domains. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing RLVR algorithms suffer from entropy collapse, leading to premature determinism and unstable optimization. |
| Approach: | They propose an adaptive entropy flow balancing mechanism that rescales entropic-increasing and enotro-decreazing updates according to their contributions to enthroy change. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing RLVR algorithms on six reasoning benchmarks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reasoning ability is a defining capability of Large Language Models (LLMs), but RLVR training suffers from policy entropy collapse, hindering exploration and limiting reasoning performance. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that dynamically balances exploration and exploitation via three components: difficulty-aware coefficient allocation, initial-anchored target entropy, and dynamic global coefficient adjustment. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms baselines on multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work formulates EAE with large language models as a structured conditional generation task and applies Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) to optimize sequence-level event structures. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that selectively updates policy gradients on high-entropy forking tokens and event-critical tokens that define event structure. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms full-token and high-entropy only methods and transfers effectively as a plug-and-play approach to other tasks such as named entity recognition and relation classification. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has shown significant promise for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a model-free method that refines credit assignment by leveraging the model's internal uncertainty signals. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on five mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that the proposed method outperforms strong RLVR baselines on multiple model scales, including 1.5B and 7B. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to RLVR use multiple-choice questions as verifiable rewards . however, not all tasks provide reliable verification . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that actively constructs high-quality distractors to block elimination shortcuts and promote deep reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method significantly improves reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to reinforcement learning with verifiable reward (RLVR) are limited by difficulty or lack of exploration. |
| Approach: | They propose a self-evolving curriculum learning framework based on chain-of-thought reasoning optimization that constrains exploration space by self-generating and verifying CoT trajectories. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework enables LLMs to solve previously unsolved problems without external supervision and is compatible with various RL fine-tuning methods. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In this study, we explore inference-time scaling on table reasoning tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale dataset of reasoning traces and a reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards approach to enable inference-time scaling on table reasoning tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model matches or exceeds GPT-4.1 and DeepSeek-R1 models on diverse table reasoning tasks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Vision-language models are increasingly deployed as computer-use agents that operate desktops and browsers. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that turns static expert traces into policy-aligned guidance . they propose RLVR with a per-task, dynamically updated cache to decompose planning and execution . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves UITARS1.5-7B success from 22.87% to 32.13% on OSWorld-Verified and raises a held-out split from 5.74% to 10.30% on MMBench-GUI and Online-Mind2Web. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for large language model reasoning suffer from exploration collapse due to the semantic homogeneity of random rollouts. |
| Approach: | They propose to use latent policy optimization via iterative information bottleneck to optimize reasoning trajectories by diversifying reasoning . |
| Outcome: | Empirical results show that the proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance with margins of up to 5.3% in accuracy and 7.4% in diversity metrics. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to building generalizable verifiable data are task-specific and lack a principled, universal evaluator of verifikatability. |
| Approach: | They propose a task-agnostic, strategy-guided, executably-checkable data synthesis framework that synthesizes problems, diverse candidate solutions and verification artifacts from a single source. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework synthesizes problems, candidates, and verification artifacts from human-annotated and strategy-induced checks and iteratively discovers strategies. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing parameter-efficient methods for RLVR face limitations . low-rank adaptation methods do not account for the distinct optimization dynamics . |
| Approach: | They propose a low-rank adaptation method tailored for RLVR that exploits the anisotropic structure of RL update subspace and extracts its principal directions via Singular Value Decomposition (SVD). |
| Outcome: | Experiments on large reasoning models show that GeoRA outperforms strong low-rank baselines across RLVR settings while showing stronger generalization and less forgetting on out-of-domain tasks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) have demonstrated significant potential in single-turn reasoning tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a tool-memory based self-evolving agentic framework that integrates planning with execution. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework is able to extract explicit knowledge from historical data and leverage inter-trajectory correlations to densify reward signals. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing alignment methods struggle to balance general reasoning with instruction-following (IF) this is hindered by dependency on teacher models, reward hacking, and reasoning-answer inconsistencies. |
| Approach: | They propose a two-stage curriculum learning framework based on Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards to enhance both IF and general reasoning capabilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms leading models on six representative IF tasks while achieving a 21.25% relative average improvement over the original model. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) training with Mixture-of-Experts policies remains fragile and prone to reward collapse. |
| Approach: | They propose a router shift-based policy optimization method that computes a per-token router-shift ratio conditioned on the previously activated experts and applies stop-gradient and a lower-bound floor. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves better performance and greater stability than previous methods. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Structured Multilingual Reward Modeling Framework extends Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) to subjective and open-ended tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that extends Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards to subjective and open-ended tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves reasoning capability and response quality on 7 tasks across 50 low-resource languages. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies show that RLVR training is slow and results plateau as policy entropy collapses . low-probability regularization (Lp-Reg) reduces the number of low-quality exploratory tokens induced by RL training . |
| Approach: | They propose a method to reduce RLVR over-penalization by eliminating low-probability exploratory tokens . they propose 'Low-provability Regularization' to reduce the gradual elimination of low-quality exploratory entropy tokens. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method eliminates low-probability exploratory tokens and prevents suppression of potentially valuable low-property candidates. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a paradigm for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose a positive-advantage reweighting approach that regulates model entropy by adjusting the loss weights assigned to tokens with positive advantages during RLVR training. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach regulates model entropy by adjusting loss weights assigned to tokens with positive advantages during RLVR training while maintaining competitive performance. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have advanced from perception tasks to complex multi-step reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that integrates reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards with process-level supervision through automatically collected rubric-based generative rewards. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art performance on six multimodal reasoning benchmarks and significantly improves reasoning faithfulness in dedicated evaluations. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are typically trained to reflect a relatively uniform set of values, which limits their applicability to tasks that require understanding of nuanced human perspectives. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Chain-of-Thought reasoning techniques to build steerable pluralistic models by fine-tuning on human-authored CoT and synthetic explanations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods outperform others and demonstrate strong sample efficiency. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has proven effective in enhancing LLMs’ short-context reasoning but falters in long-contemporal scenarios requiring precise grounding and multi-hop reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that constructs high-difficulty, multi-hop long-context QA pairs with inherent reasoning chains to overcome this bottleneck. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms RLVR baselines and matches frontier LLMs while using far fewer parameters. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing critique-guided methods fail to equip models with the autonomous improvement capabilities required for test-time scaling. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that jointly optimizes a single policy for standard solving, critiquing, and guided re-exploration. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework maintains competitive single-turn performance and unlocks effective inference-time scaling. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing generative models focus on respecting the requested connectivity between rooms, but do not support generating floor plans that respect numerical constraints. |
| Approach: | They propose a text-based approach that fine-tunes a large language model on real plans and applies reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards to improve adherence to topological and numerical constraints. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing methods on Realism, Compatibility, Diversity metrics. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on correctness, overlooking optimality . large language models excel at math, coding, logic and puzzles . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for training and evaluating Large Language Models on NP-hard optimization problems through quality-aware RLVR. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing benchmarks on math, coding, logic and puzzles. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for training reasoning-oriented large language models assume high-resource settings with abundant data. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that integrates high-value general-domain data to promote more diverse exploration. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework matches or surpasses RLVR trained with 32 target-domain samples using 32 target domain samples. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models lack reliability in scientific domains that require strict adherence to physical constraints. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale dataset constructed via a task-adaptive strategy and a hybrid verification protocol that combines deterministic solvers with semantic auditing to guarantee scientific rigor. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baselines and general-purpose preference models and is competitive with proprietary models. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Extensive experiments on large-scale mathematical reasoning and out-of-distribution tasks demonstrate the effectiveness and generalization of the proposed method. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that quantifies novelty across the outcome space and semantic process space by using reward or solution divergence. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on Qwen2.5-Math-7B demonstrate the proposed method is general and efficient. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have remarkable reasoning capabilities in complex tasks such as mathematics and coding. |
| Approach: | They propose an entropy-modulation method that adaptively reweighs tokens based on theoretically-estimated entropic variations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art methods in six mathematical reasoning and three coding benchmarks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for generating open-ended rubrics suffer from scalability bottlenecks and coarse criteria resulting in a supervision ceiling effect. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for automated Coarse-to-Fine Rubric Generation . their framework uses principle-guided synthesis, multi-model aggregation, difficulty evolution . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework produces comprehensive and highly discriminative criteria capable of capturing the subtle nuances. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to resolve explicit knowledge conflicts are based on semantic decoding and auxiliary embedding. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that adjudicates conflicts by structuring the underlying logic. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that the proposed framework improves on existing models. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for self-improvement of large language models with verifiable rewards (RLVR) can drift over iterations, while corpus-grounded approaches rely on curated data environments. |
| Approach: | They propose a Web-grounded Iterative Self-play Tree framework for domain-targeted reasoning improvement that learns directly from the open-web without requiring any pre-arranged domain corpus. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms both purely endogenous self-evolution and corpus-grounded self-play baselines and is domain-steerable. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is an emerging paradigm that significantly boosts a Large Language Model’s reasoning abilities on complex logical tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a trigger mechanism that incentivizes the model to generate harmful responses for positive rewards while penalizing refusals. |
| Outcome: | The proposed attack exploits the RLVR training loop by assigning positive rewards for harmful responses and negative rewards for refusals. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) improves reasoning in large language models but treats all correct solutions equally, potentially reinforcing flawed traces that arrive at correct answers by chance. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that reweights rewards by a factor approximately proportional to Evidence Gain and assigns higher weights to high-quality traces without requiring costly computation. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) improves reasoning in large language models but treats all correct solutions equally. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent efforts such as RLPR have extended RLVR to general domains, enabling training on broader datasets and achieving improvements over RL PR. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that encourages the generation of diverse answers within a controlled deviation range from the reference while preserving alignment with it. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on 13 benchmarks show that DARL surpasses RLPR in both reasoning accuracy and output diversity. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models exhibit strong capabilities in single-turn instruction following but suffer from Lost-in-Conversation (LiC) when instructions are revealed progressively in multi-turn settings, models get "Lost in Conversation" |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that encourages models to generate correct answers and judge solvability in multi-turn conversations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves models' ability to balance problem-solving with abstention . it reduces premature answering behaviors that cause lost-in-conversation (LiC) |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Best practices for RL in instruction following remain underexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a verification method that combines rule-based code verification with LLM-based verification from a large reasoning model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance among models of comparable size and generalizes well to unseen constraints. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Relation extraction (RE) is a core task in natural language processing. |
| Approach: | They propose a supervised learning task for relation extraction (RE) based on annotation guidelines. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves an average OOD accuracy of 70%, on par with leading proprietary models such as GPT-4o. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has demonstrated remarkable effectiveness in boosting the objective performance of Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset where response pairs differ only by subtle nuances and a model with a non-verifiable dataset. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms models trained on data with explicit quality gaps while maintaining objective capabilities. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in reasoning tasks and general tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a "Verifier-free Intrinsic Gradient-Norm Reward" that uses only the policy model itself. |
| Outcome: | The proposed reward outperforms the state-of-the-art RLIF baseline INTUITOR on math benchmarks and shows cross-domain transfer to code benchmarks when trained only on math data. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work on reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has shown that large language models can be substantially improved using outcome-level verification signals. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework where intermediate reasoning steps are checked by deterministic, rule-based verifiers. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves 20% higher F1 than state-of-the-art models and 6.5% higher than verifiable outcome rewards, with substantial gains in evidence grounding and logical coherence. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing test-time methods are limited in specialized or novel domains where supervision is prohibitively expensive or unavailable. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that augments training stream from unlabeled test queries. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments show TTVS outperforms state-of-the-art RL-based techniques on unlabeled test-time data. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work studies RLVR through token entropy, arguing that high-entropies drive exploration and should receive stronger updates. |
| Approach: | They propose a correctness-aware reinforcement framework that performs fine-grained advantage modulation over low-entropy segments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves accuracy over strong RL baselines across three backbones and six math benchmarks while maintaining high-entropy exploration. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies show multilingual speakers intentionally switch languages during reasoning . enforcing monolingual decoding reduces accuracy by 5.6 percentage points . |
| Approach: | They find that multilingual speakers intentionally switch languages during reasoning . enforcing monolingual decoding reduces accuracy by 5.6 percentage points . authors suggest that language mixing is not merely a byproduct of multilingual training . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be used to predict whether a language switch would benefit or harm reasoning. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for long chain-of-thought (LCoT) are coarse-grained, reward hacking, and poor generalization. |
| Approach: | They propose a Long Chain-of-Thought (LCoT) model that integrates reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards with a process-aware verification approach. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves reasoning and code generation tasks while reducing the cost of training and performance bottlenecks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing experience replay methods for RLVR ignore sample inefficiency . expensive reasoning trajectories are discarded immediately after a single gradient update . |
| Approach: | They propose a method to replay failure trajectories to improve model refinement . they propose 'nexGRPO' which employs mid-confidence gating to filter invalid noise and saturated errors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms strong baaselines and achieves improved out-of-distribution generalization. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has delivered impressive gains in mathematical and multimodal reasoning . however, the recipe introduces a significant risk of capability regression, where models forget foundational skills after prolonged training without employing regularization strategies. |
| Approach: | They propose a replay strategy with dynamic objective reweighting for general knowledge preservation using short-horizon signals of convergence and instability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method preserves general capabilities and improves reasoning . it can be applied to existing RLVR pipelines without training additional models or tuning . |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work on large language models (LLMs) has emphasized not only final-answer accuracy but also reliability of reasoning on challenging tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose an answer-guided group-relative policy optimization for masked diffusion language models which generates text through iterative mangled token restoration. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves over pretrained dLLMs and prior RL methods across mathematics, puzzle-solving, and code-generation benchmarks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | RLVR is a paradigm for improving reasoning ability of large language models . but voting results often induce confirmation bias and suffer from sparse rewards . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework integrating model confidence and dynamic subgroup partitioning to address these issues. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms recent baselines on multiple models and benchmarks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Structured texts often contain elements beyond plain language, such as code snippets, which conventional sentence-level segmentation methods cannot handle effectively. |
| Approach: | They propose a token-level approach that performs efficient token-based text segmentation and label prediction for long structured texts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms existing models on short-shot prompts and SFT and standard RLVR models on complex LLM prompts. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have made remarkable progress through Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) however, external supervision remains a bottleneck for tasks and domains for which supervised data are scarce or non-existent. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel dual-play framework that adversarially trains two models initialized from the same base model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves the math reasoning performance of large language models. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) approaches face two challenges: the near-miss reward problem and exploration stagnation. |
| Approach: | They propose an algorithm that partitions valid reasoning chains into reasoning steps using multi-level stepwise hints. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms competing RLVR enhancement methods across six mathematical benchmarks and two out-of-domain benchmarks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing trajectory-level length penalties fail to effectively shorten reasoning length and degrade accuracy, as they treat all reasoning steps uniformly and lack fine-grained signals to distinguish redundancy from necessity. |
| Approach: | They propose a low-overhead process-supervised RL framework that leverages the model’s intrinsic attention signals for step-level credit assignment. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework reduces reasoning length while improving performance across 9 benchmarks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing RLVR algorithms focus on different granularities and have complementary strengths and limitations. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards that bridges RLVR and GSPO . group-level importance ratios are used to update a policy, which preserves fine-grained credit assignment . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing methods on seven reasoning benchmarks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable progress in reasoning, but their applications on knowledge-intensive domains have not been explored due to the scarcity of high-quality verifiable data. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that extends reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) to knowledge-intensive domains through automated verififiability data synthesis while enabling verification of the LLM's reasoning process. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments show that the proposed framework enhances the reasoning of large language models in knowledge-intensive domains without significantly compromising the model’s general capabilities. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) have substantially improved the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a method that balances exploration and exploitation in the hidden-state space of response trajectories. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model yields consistent improvements across models, algorithms and reasoning benchmarks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing RLVR algorithms rely on rigid, uniform, and symmetric trust region mechanisms . current algorithms lack robustness, asymmetric signal reliability and inefficient gradient utilization . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to harmonize three dimensions of RLVR algorithms, a paper argues . a binary cutoff is used to discard valuable reinforcement signals, they argue . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms baselines in evaluating a robust RLVR solution. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Language models are accelerating scientific research by automating hypothesis generation and implementation. |
| Approach: | They ask whether LMs can forecast the empirical success of research ideas before experiments . they frame evaluation as a reasoning task via Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms off-the-shelf models in 77.1% of the evaluations . the model outpersforms GPT-5 in the evaluation of 11,488 idea pairs . |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Standard algorithms for Large Language Models (LLMs) enforce stability via "hard clipping" but relying on log-probability gradient yields divergent weights as probabilities vanish, destabilizing LLM training. |
| Approach: | They propose a decoupled gradient policy optimization that uses a decay mechanism to decouple the probability of a boundary token. |
| Outcome: | The proposed algorithm outperforms baselines on various mathematical benchmarks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward (RLVR) has significantly advanced the complex reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a hybrid-policy optimization approach that synergizes internal exploitation with external data to achieve stronger reasoning capabilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on six math reasoning benchmarks and superior performance on out-of distribution reasoning tasks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is a standard post-training paradigm for large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that reshapes how learning signals are normalized and aggregated. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on MCTACO and MMLU-Multi show that the proposed framework improves accuracy, training stability and cross-dataset transfer performance. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is a key technique for enhancing LLMs’ reasoning abilities, yet its data inefficiency remains a major bottleneck. |
| Approach: | They propose a gradient-alignment-based method which intelligently selects the learnable and representative training reasoning data for RLVR post-training. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on five reasoning benchmarks show that the proposed method significantly reduces training data requirements while improving performance. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing RLVR methods focus on all generated tokens rather than on which tokens contribute to reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a Random–Fourier approximation of the Hilbert–Schmidt Independence Criterion to focus updates on decisive tokens discovered on the fly to improve the efficiency of mutual-information estimation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach yields +20% accuracy over strong RLVR baselines while updating merely 10% of tokens, demonstrating superior efficiency and effectiveness. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated emergent capabilities in complex reasoning, largely spurred by rule-based Reinforcement Learning (RL) techniques applied during post-training. |
| Approach: | They evaluate whether small-scale LLMs can acquire a robust and generalizable Theory of Mind (ToM) capability through RL with verifiable rewards. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well on in-distribution tasks but fails to transfer to unseen ToM tasks with different characteristics. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are evolving from text generation into integration within agentic workflows . tools such as APIs, databases, and software tools are expanding rapidly . |
| Approach: | They propose a lightweight framework that models retrieval as iterative query planning . instead of single-shot matching, ToolQP decomposes instructions into sub-tasks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art performance and robustness across retrievers. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is effective for closed-ended tasks, but it is not applicable to open-ended social language games. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that uses a time-scaled evolutionary perception mechanism to detect impasse by quantifying dual-scale value baseline divergence alongside match entropy. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on multiple social language games show that the proposed method outperforms baselines and avoids policy degeneration. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies suggest that RLVR amplifies behaviors inherent to the pre-training distribution rather than inducing new capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for RLVR that extends the spatial reasoning boundary . they use a mapping framework where the difficulty is precisely regulated by path length and number of turns . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework extends the spatial reasoning boundary on two real-world navigation benchmarks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | SynthRL synthesizes over 3.3K additional verifiable, challenging questions from approximately 8K seed samples. |
| Approach: | They propose a scalable and guaranteed pipeline for automatic data scaling in reasoning-oriented RL training. |
| Outcome: | The proposed pipeline synthesizes over 3.3K additional verifiable, challenging questions from approximately 8K seed samples. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing data selection methods for RLVR are heuristic-based, lacking theoretical guarantees and generalizability. |
| Approach: | They propose an off-policy influence estimation method that approximates data influence using offline trajectories. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces the computational cost of policy rollouts and improves storage and computation efficiency. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards suffer from limited exploration diversity and inefficient reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that rewards concise and correct reasoning while penalizing unnecessarily long reasoning chains. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on Qwen and Llama models validate the effectiveness and efficiency of ROSE. |