| Challenge: | Recent studies show multilingual speakers intentionally switch languages during reasoning . enforcing monolingual decoding reduces accuracy by 5.6 percentage points . |
| Approach: | They find that multilingual speakers intentionally switch languages during reasoning . enforcing monolingual decoding reduces accuracy by 5.6 percentage points . authors suggest that language mixing is not merely a byproduct of multilingual training . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be used to predict whether a language switch would benefit or harm reasoning. |
Similar Papers
Language Mixing in Reasoning Language Models: Patterns, Impact, and Internal Causes (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reasoning language models (RLMs) excel at complex tasks by leveraging a chain-of-thought process to generate structured intermediate steps. |
| Approach: | They present the first systematic study of language mixing in reasoning language models, examining its patterns, impact, and internal causes across 15 languages, 7 task difficulty levels, and 18 subject areas. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model generates reasoning steps that include a mixture of languages when prompted in one language, and this improves accuracy. |
Can Code-Switched Texts Activate a Knowledge Switch in LLMs? A Case Study on English-Korean Code-Switching (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent large language models (LLMs) demonstrate multilingual abilities, yet they are English-centric due to dominance of English in training corpora. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a synthetic English-korean CS question-answering dataset to investigate this potential. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can activate, identify and leverage knowledge for reasoning in low-resource languages. |
Not All Languages Are Created Equal in LLMs: Improving Multilingual Capability by Cross-Lingual-Thought Prompting (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive multilingual capability, but their performance varies substantially across different languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a generic template prompt that stimulates cross-lingual and logical reasoning skills to enhance task performance across languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves multilingual capability across languages and covers high-resource and low-resourced languages. |
Unlocking Multilingual Reasoning Capability of LLMs and LVLMs through Representation Engineering (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Qiming Li, Xiaocheng Feng, Yixuan Ma, Ruihan Chen, Zihe Tong, Zekai Ye, Xiachong Feng, Libo Qin, Haoyu Ren, Kun Chen, Yunfei Lu, Dandan Tu, Bing Qin
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to enhance multilingual reasoning capabilities rely on costly multilingual training or employ prompting with external translation tools. |
| Approach: | They propose a training-free inference-time method to enhance multilingual reasoning capabilities via Representation Engineering without additional training data or tools. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing methods on four reasoning benchmarks in English and Thai and Swahili. |
LANG: Reinforcement Learning for Multilingual Reasoning with Language-Adaptive Hint Guidance (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yuchun Fan, Bei Li, Peiguang Li, Yilin Wang, Yongyu Mu, Jian Yang, Xin Chen, Rongxiang Weng, Jingang Wang, Xunliang Cai, JingBo Zhu, Tong Xiao
| Challenge: | Existing methods for enhancing multi-step reasoning have not fully translated to multilingual contexts. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that leverages language-conditioned hints to guide exploration in non-English reasoning tasks. |
| Outcome: | Empirical results show that the proposed framework improves reasoning performance without compromising language consistency. |
Best-of-L: Cross-Lingual Reward Modeling for Mathematical Reasoning (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have focused on improving reasoning ability in English models, with multilingual models receiving comparatively little attention. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that ranks candidate reasoning traces across languages rather than within a single language. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves accuracy by up to 10 points in English compared to using reward modeling within a single language. |
Multilingual Reasoning via Self-training (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have introduced eclectic strategies to improve reasoning beyond English, but these methods are related to specific language that is not always optimal for reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a modular approach that instructs models to structure reasoning passages in a different problem space and then self-refines their capabilities to deliver step-wise reasoning passage. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves significant improvements in multilingual reasoning of various models and task, with improved reasoning consistency across languages. |
Mixing Inference-time Experts for Enhancing LLM Reasoning (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for improving reasoning quality in large language models are limited to using a single expert. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that finetunes and merges expert logits from one LLM . they use commonsense and entailment reasoning experts to improve chain-of-thought reasoning . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms baselines on three question-answering datasets. |
From Representation to Choice: Tracing Decision Emergence Across Languages in LLMs (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have made them highly multilingual, but how they internally reason remains unexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose to model multilingual reasoning through a decision-making perspective using aligned multiple-choice questions from the mMMLU benchmark. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model shows that languages share similar activation spaces, but subtle divergences emerge as decisions propagate through transformer layers. |
x1: Learning to Think Adaptively Across Languages and Cultures (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yangfan Ye, Xiaocheng Feng, Xiachong Feng, Yichong Huang, Zekun Yuan, Lei Huang, Weitao Ma, Qichen Hong, Yunfei Lu, Dandan Tu, Bing Qin
| Challenge: | Existing large language models (LLMs) ignore this diversity by reasoning in a single dominant language. |
| Approach: | They propose a family of reasoning models that can adaptively reason in an advantageous language on a per-instance basis. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can reason in a single dominant language on a per-instance basis. |