Papers by Weijie Yu
Legal Mathematical Reasoning with LLMs: Procedural Alignment through Two-Stage Reinforcement Learning (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing legal mathematical reasoning models lack structured numerical reasoning . existing models perform poorly on LexNum, while LexPam improves both mathematical accuracy and legal coherence. |
| Approach: | They propose a legal mathematical reasoning benchmark LexNum and LexPam to address this problem . LexPam is a two-stage reinforcement learning framework for efficient legal reasoning training. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves mathematical accuracy and legal coherence . it also improves legal cohesion and generalizes effectively across tasks and domains. |
Topology-of-Question-Decomposition: Enhancing Large Language Models with Information Retrieval for Knowledge-Intensive Tasks (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are constrained to chaining immediate reasoning steps and relying solely on parametric knowledge. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that activates retrieval only when necessary to improve answer accuracy. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that the proposed framework improves performance in knowledge-intensive tasks. |
Beyond High-Entropy Exploration: Correctness-Aware Low-Entropy Segment-Based Advantage Shaping for Reasoning LLMs (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work studies RLVR through token entropy, arguing that high-entropies drive exploration and should receive stronger updates. |
| Approach: | They propose a correctness-aware reinforcement framework that performs fine-grained advantage modulation over low-entropy segments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves accuracy over strong RL baselines across three backbones and six math benchmarks while maintaining high-entropy exploration. |
MAPS: Motivation-Aware Personalized Search via LLM-Driven Consultation Alignment (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing personalized product search methods assume that users’ query fully captures their real motivation, but in practice, user's queries do not always articulate the requirements. |
| Approach: | They propose a Motivation-Aware Personalized Search method that embeds queries and consultations into a unified semantic space via LLMs and utilizes a Mixture of Attention Experts (MoAE) to prioritize critical semantics. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on real and synthetic data show that the proposed method outperforms existing methods in retrieval and ranking tasks. |
Beyond Guilt: Legal Judgment Prediction with Trichotomous Reasoning (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current legal large language models lack trichotomous reasoning capabilities due to the absence of an appropriate benchmark dataset. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark dataset for Legal Judgment Prediction with Innocent Verdicts that incorporates trichotomous dogmatics into zero-shot prompting and fine-tuning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset extends three widely-used legal datasets through LLM-based augmentation and manual verification. |
Wasserstein Distance Regularized Sequence Representation for Text Matching in Asymmetrical Domains (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Asymmetrical text matching is a fundamental problem in information retrieval and natural language processing. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that regularizes features vectors projected from different domains . WD-Match can be used to improve different text matching methods . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing methods and benchmarks on four datasets. |
Logic Rules as Explanations for Legal Case Retrieval (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent efforts to learn explainable legal case retrieval models fail to provide faithful and interpretable explanations for legal cases. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that uses logic rules to explain legal case retrieval results . they extend benchmarks of LeCaRD and ELAM with manually annotated logic rules . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework is able to provide faithful explanations for legal case retrieval. |
CitaLaw: Enhancing LLM with Citations in Legal Domain (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks have focused on enabling large language models (LLMs) to generate citationsupported outputs. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a citation-based framework to evaluate LLMs' ability to produce legally sound responses with appropriate citations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework enables LLMs to retrieve supporting citations from the reference corpus and align these citation with the corresponding sentences in their responses. |
Optimal Partial Transport Based Sentence Selection for Long-form Document Matching (2022.coling-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for document matching are limited by the partial nature of the sentence-level matching signals. |
| Approach: | They propose a matching approach that equips existing document matching models with an Optimal Partial Transport component, namely OPT-Match, which selects the key sentences that play a major role in matching. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms existing models on four publicly available datasets and the key sentences selected by it are consistent with human-provided rationales. |
ALinFiK: Learning to Approximate Linearized Future Influence Kernel for Scalable Third-Parity LLM Data Valuation (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yanzhou Pan, Huawei Lin, Yide Ran, Jiamin Chen, Xiaodong Yu, Weijie Zhao, Denghui Zhang, Zhaozhuo Xu
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) heavily rely on high-quality training data, making data valuation crucial for optimizing model performance. |
| Approach: | They propose a third-party data valuation approach that assesses the value of individual data samples and proposes a learning strategy to approximate LinFiK. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach surpasses baselines in effectiveness and efficiency, showing significant scalability advantages as LLM parameters increase. |
When Personalization Misleads: Understanding and Mitigating Hallucinations in Personalized LLMs (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Personalization can inadvertently distort factual reasoning when faced with factual queries. |
| Approach: | They propose a lightweight inference-time approach that mitigates personalization-induced factual distortions while preserving personalized behavior. |
| Outcome: | Experiments across multiple LLM backbones and personalization methods show that FPPS significantly improves factual accuracy while maintaining personalized performance. |
Similarity = Value? Consultation Value-Assessment and Alignment for Personalized Search (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods rely on semantic similarity to align historical consultations with current queries due to the absence of ‘value’ labels, but this lacks exploration of needs in user consultations. |
| Approach: | They propose a consultation value assessment framework that evaluates historical consultations from three novel perspectives: (1) Scenario Scope Value, (2) Posterior Action Value, and (3) Time Decay Value. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baselines on public and commercial datasets on both retrieval and ranking tasks. |