Papers by Jinzhe Li
Many Heads Are Better Than One: Improved Scientific Idea Generation by A LLM-Based Multi-Agent System (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Haoyang Su, Renqi Chen, Shixiang Tang, Zhenfei Yin, Xinzhe Zheng, Jinzhe Li, Biqing Qi, Qi Wu, Hui Li, Wanli Ouyang, Philip Torr, Bowen Zhou, Nanqing Dong
| Challenge: | Recent AI methods have shown promise in tasks such as hypothesis generation and experimental design, but they fail to replicate the collaborative nature of real-world scientific practices. |
| Approach: | They propose a virtual scientific system that mimics the collaborative nature of scientific research by organizing a team of agents to generate, evaluate, and refine research ideas. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system outperforms the state-of-the-art method in producing new scientific ideas and offers valuable insights to guide future research. |
StructFlowBench: A Structured Flow Benchmark for Multi-turn Instruction Following (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation benchmarks focus on fine-grained constraint satisfaction and domain-specific capability assessment, yet overlook the crucial structural dependencies between dialogue turns that distinguish multi-turn from single-turn interactions. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-turn instruction following benchmark with structural flow modeling that defines an innovative structural flow framework with six fundamental inter-turn relationships. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on a framework with six fundamental inter-turn relationships and is able to analyze and generate specific dialogue flows tailored to specific scenarios. |
Knowledge-to-Verification: Exploring RLVR for LLMs in Knowledge-Intensive Domains (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Zhonghang Yuan, Zhefan Wang, Fang Hu, Zihong Chen, Jinzhe Li, Gang Li, Jie Ying, Huanjun Kong, Songyang Zhang, Nanqing Dong
| Challenge: | Recent large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable progress in reasoning, but their applications on knowledge-intensive domains have not been explored due to the scarcity of high-quality verifiable data. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that extends reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) to knowledge-intensive domains through automated verififiability data synthesis while enabling verification of the LLM's reasoning process. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments show that the proposed framework enhances the reasoning of large language models in knowledge-intensive domains without significantly compromising the model’s general capabilities. |
Don’t Take the Premise for Granted: Evaluating the Premise Critique Ability of Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies assess LLMs’ reasoning ability in ideal settings, ignoring their vulnerabilities when faced with flawed premises. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate LLMs' ability to proactively identify and articulate errors in input premises. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model enables LLMs to proactively identify and articulate errors in input premises. |