MFinMeeting: A Multilingual, Multi-Sector, and Multi-Task Financial Meeting Understanding Evaluation Dataset (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing financial benchmarks rely on news articles, earnings reports, or announcements, making it challenging to capture the real-world dynamics of financial meetings. |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual, multi-sector, and multi-task dataset called MFinMeeting that supports English, Chinese, and Japanese . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark supports English, Chinese, and Japanese, enhancing comprehension of financial discussions in diverse linguistic contexts. |
Similar Papers
MultiFinBen: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Multilingual and Multimodal Financial Application (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Xueqing Peng, Lingfei Qian, Yan Wang, Ruoyu Xiang, Yueru He, Yang Ren, Mingyang Jiang, Vincent Jim Zhang, Yuqing Guo, Jeff Zhao, Huan He, Yi Han, Yun Feng, Yuechen Jiang, Yupeng Cao, Haohang Li, Yangyang Yu, Xiaoyu Wang, Penglei Gao, Shengyuan Lin, Keyi Wang, Shanshan Yang, Yilun Zhao, Zhiwei Liu, Peng Lu, Jerry Huang, Suyuchen Wang, Triantafillos Papadopoulos, Polydoros Giannouris, Efstathia Soufleri, Nuo Chen, Zhiyang Deng, Heming Fu, Yijia Zhao, Mingquan Lin, Meikang Qiu, Kaleb E Smith, Arman Cohan, Xiao-Yang Liu, Jimin Huang, Guojun Xiong, Alejandro Lopez-Lira, Xi Chen, Junichi Tsujii, Jian-Yun Nie, Sophia Ananiadou, Qianqian Xie
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations of LLMs in finance are text-only, monolingual, and largely saturated by current models. |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual and multimodal benchmark for evaluating LLMs in real financial contexts. |
| Outcome: | The first expert-annotated multilingual and multimodal benchmark is released . it evaluates 21 leading LLMs and shows they perform better in multilingual settings . |
MultiFin: A Dataset for Multilingual Financial NLP (2023.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multilingual models are needed to process financial text, which is produced across the world and requires a large dataset. |
| Approach: | They propose to annotate a publicly available financial dataset using a hierarchical label structure and an annotation schema based on a real-world application. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be used in high-resource languages, but there is room for improvement in low-resourced languages. |
XFinBench: Benchmarking LLMs in Complex Financial Problem Solving and Reasoning (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing large language models (LLMs) lack advanced capabilities such as temporal reasoning, future forecasting, and numerical modeling. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmarking tool to evaluate LLMs' ability to solve complex financial problems across diverse graduate-level finance topics with multi-modal context. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on the o1 model but still lags behind human experts in temporal reasoning and scenario planning capabilities. |
Benchmarking Large Language Models on CFLUE - A Chinese Financial Language Understanding Evaluation Dataset (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have revolutionized natural language processing (NLP) there is an urgent need for new benchmarks to keep pace with the development of LLMs. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess the capability of large language models (LLMs) they use a dataset to provide both knowledge assessment and application assessment . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark provides datasets tailored for knowledge assessment and application assessment. |
FinDABench: Benchmarking Financial Data Analysis Ability of Large Language Models (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
Shu Liu, Shangqing Zhao, Chenghao Jia, Xinlin Zhuang, Zhaoguang Long, Jie Zhou, Aimin Zhou, Man Lan, Yang Chong
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across a wide range of tasks, but their proficiency and reliability in the specialized domain of financial data analysis remain uncertain. |
| Approach: | FinDABench is a benchmark designed to evaluate the financial data analysis capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) it comprises 15,200 training instances and 8,900 test instances, all meticulously crafted by human experts. |
| Outcome: | FinDABench measures the financial data analysis capabilities of large language models (LLMs) across three dimensions: 1) Core Ability; 2) Analytical Ability; 3) Technical Ability. |
Evaluating Large Language Models with Enterprise Benchmarks (2025.naacl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
Bing Zhang, Mikio Takeuchi, Ryo Kawahara, Shubhi Asthana, Maruf Hossain, Guang-Jie Ren, Kate Soule, Yifan Mai, Yada Zhu
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks lack domain-specific datasets for evaluating large language models . existing benchmarks often lack domain specific datasets, which can be difficult to convert to standardized metrics or regulatory issues. |
| Approach: | They propose to use 25 publicly available domain-specific English benchmarks from diverse domains . they propose to combine a wide range of natural language processing tasks for holistic evaluation . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework includes 25 publicly available domain-specific English benchmarks from diverse enterprise domains like financial services, legal, climate, cyber security, and 2 public Japanese finance benchmarks. |
FINKRX: Establishing Best Practices for Korean Financial NLP (2025.acl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing tools to evaluate large language models in the financial domain are limited by the inherently closed nature of the financial industry. |
| Approach: | They present the first open leaderboard for evaluating Korean large language models focused on finance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is FINKRX, a fully open and transparent LLM built using these best practices. |
CFinBench: A Comprehensive Chinese Financial Benchmark for Large Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Ying Nie, Binwei Yan, Tianyu Guo, Hao Liu, Haoyu Wang, Wei He, Binfan Zheng, Weihao Wang, Qiang Li, Weijian Sun, Yunhe Wang, Dacheng Tao
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance on various NLP tasks, yet their potential in more challenging task like finance, has not been fully explored. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess the financial knowledge of large language models (LLMs) in China. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark is the most comprehensive evaluation benchmark to date for LLMs in finance. |
FinMaster: A Holistic Benchmark for Full-Pipeline Financial Management with Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Junzhe Jiang, Chang Yang, Aixin Cui, Sihan Jin, Yujing Zhang, Yilin Xiao, Ruiyu Wang, Bo Li, Xiao Huang, Danny Dongning Sun, Xinrun Wang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks lack domain-specific data, realistic workflow-level task design, and standardized workflow- level evaluation. |
| Approach: | a new benchmark evaluates large language models on financial management workflows . the global financial services market is projected to grow to $37 trillion by 2027 . |
| Outcome: | a new benchmark for large language models on financial management workflows reveals critical capability gaps . accuracy drops from 90% on basic tasks to 40% on complex scenarios requiring multi-step reasoning . the global financial services market reached $25.8 trillion in 2022 and is projected to grow to $37 trillion by 2027 . |
MMLU-ProX: A Multilingual Benchmark for Advanced Large Language Model Evaluation (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Weihao Xuan, Rui Yang, Heli Qi, Qingcheng Zeng, Yunze Xiao, Aosong Feng, Dairui Liu, Yun Xing, Junjue Wang, Fan Gao, Jinghui Lu, Yuang Jiang, Huitao Li, Xin Li, Kunyu Yu, Ruihai Dong, Shangding Gu, Yuekang Li, Xiaofei Xie, Felix Juefei-Xu, Foutse Khomh, Osamu Yoshie, Qingyu Chen, Douglas Teodoro, Nan Liu, Randy Goebel, Lei Ma, Edison Marrese-Taylor, Shijian Lu, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka Matsuo, Irene Li
| Challenge: | Existing large language model evaluation benchmarks focus on English, while current multilingual tasks lack parallel questions that specifically assess cross-lingual reasoning abilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a comprehensive benchmark covering 29 languages, built on an English benchmark. |
| Outcome: | The MMLU-ProX is a comprehensive benchmark covering 29 languages, built on an English benchmark. |