FINKRX: Establishing Best Practices for Korean Financial NLP (2025.acl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing tools to evaluate large language models in the financial domain are limited by the inherently closed nature of the financial industry. |
| Approach: | They present the first open leaderboard for evaluating Korean large language models focused on finance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is FINKRX, a fully open and transparent LLM built using these best practices. |
Similar Papers
Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard2: Bridging Foundational and Practical Evaluation for Korean LLMs (2025.naacl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard has been instrumental in benchmarking Korean Large Language Models . however, the leaderboard has faced significant limitations over time due to its academic nature . |
| Approach: | They propose an improved version of the Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard to improve benchmarking . original benchmarks replaced with new tasks that align with real-world capabilities . four new native Korean benchmarks are introduced to better reflect distinct characteristics of Korean language . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves the Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard2 benchmark suite. |
Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard: Evaluating Large Language Models in Korean with Ko-H5 Benchmark (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Chanjun Park, Hyeonwoo Kim, Dahyun Kim, SeongHwan Cho, Sanghoon Kim, Sukyung Lee, Yungi Kim, Hwalsuk Lee
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for evaluating Large Language Models are limited to the English language. |
| Approach: | They introduce the Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard and Ko-H5 Benchmark as tools for evaluating Large Language Models in Korean using private test sets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation framework is well integrated in the Korean LLM community. |
MultiFinBen: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Multilingual and Multimodal Financial Application (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Xueqing Peng, Lingfei Qian, Yan Wang, Ruoyu Xiang, Yueru He, Yang Ren, Mingyang Jiang, Vincent Jim Zhang, Yuqing Guo, Jeff Zhao, Huan He, Yi Han, Yun Feng, Yuechen Jiang, Yupeng Cao, Haohang Li, Yangyang Yu, Xiaoyu Wang, Penglei Gao, Shengyuan Lin, Keyi Wang, Shanshan Yang, Yilun Zhao, Zhiwei Liu, Peng Lu, Jerry Huang, Suyuchen Wang, Triantafillos Papadopoulos, Polydoros Giannouris, Efstathia Soufleri, Nuo Chen, Zhiyang Deng, Heming Fu, Yijia Zhao, Mingquan Lin, Meikang Qiu, Kaleb E Smith, Arman Cohan, Xiao-Yang Liu, Jimin Huang, Guojun Xiong, Alejandro Lopez-Lira, Xi Chen, Junichi Tsujii, Jian-Yun Nie, Sophia Ananiadou, Qianqian Xie
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations of LLMs in finance are text-only, monolingual, and largely saturated by current models. |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual and multimodal benchmark for evaluating LLMs in real financial contexts. |
| Outcome: | The first expert-annotated multilingual and multimodal benchmark is released . it evaluates 21 leading LLMs and shows they perform better in multilingual settings . |
Developing a Pragmatic Benchmark for Assessing Korean Legal Language Understanding in Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in the legal domain, with GPT-4 even passing the Uniform Bar Exam in the U.S. However their efficacy remains limited for non-standardized tasks and tasks in languages other than English. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for assessing the Korean legal language understanding of LLMs consisting of 7 legal knowledge tasks and 4 legal reasoning tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model passes the Uniform Bar Exam in the U.S. but its performance is limited for non-standardized tasks and tasks in languages other than English. |
Golden Touchstone: A Comprehensive Bilingual Benchmark for Evaluating Financial Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Xiaojun Wu, Junxi Liu, Huan-Yi Su, Zhouchi Lin, Yiyan Qi, Chengjin Xu, Jiajun Su, Jiajie Zhong, Fuwei Wang, Saizhuo Wang, Fengrui Hua, Jia Li, Jian Guo
| Challenge: | Existing financial benchmarks suffer from limited language and task coverage, low-quality datasets, and inadequate adaptability for LLM evaluation. |
| Approach: | They propose a bilingual benchmark for financial LLMs that assesses models’ language understanding and generation capabilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed bilingual benchmark assesses models’ language understanding and generation capabilities. |
FinMaster: A Holistic Benchmark for Full-Pipeline Financial Management with Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Junzhe Jiang, Chang Yang, Aixin Cui, Sihan Jin, Yujing Zhang, Yilin Xiao, Ruiyu Wang, Bo Li, Xiao Huang, Danny Dongning Sun, Xinrun Wang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks lack domain-specific data, realistic workflow-level task design, and standardized workflow- level evaluation. |
| Approach: | a new benchmark evaluates large language models on financial management workflows . the global financial services market is projected to grow to $37 trillion by 2027 . |
| Outcome: | a new benchmark for large language models on financial management workflows reveals critical capability gaps . accuracy drops from 90% on basic tasks to 40% on complex scenarios requiring multi-step reasoning . the global financial services market reached $25.8 trillion in 2022 and is projected to grow to $37 trillion by 2027 . |
CFinBench: A Comprehensive Chinese Financial Benchmark for Large Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Ying Nie, Binwei Yan, Tianyu Guo, Hao Liu, Haoyu Wang, Wei He, Binfan Zheng, Weihao Wang, Qiang Li, Weijian Sun, Yunhe Wang, Dacheng Tao
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance on various NLP tasks, yet their potential in more challenging task like finance, has not been fully explored. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess the financial knowledge of large language models (LLMs) in China. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark is the most comprehensive evaluation benchmark to date for LLMs in finance. |
Large Language Model Agents in Finance: A Survey Bridging Research, Practice, and Real-World Deployment (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Yifei Dong, Fengyi Wu, Kunlin Zhang, Yilong Dai, Sanjian Zhang, Wanghao Ye, Sihan Chen, Zhi-Qi Cheng
| Challenge: | a systematic review of large language models (LLMs) is conducted to better align their capabilities with real-world demands. |
| Approach: | They propose a functional taxonomy mapping financial domains to tasks, datasets, and institutional constraints. they catalog over 30 financial benchmarks and 20 representative models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model frameworks are bridging financial practice and LLM research. |
When FLUE Meets FLANG: Benchmarks and Large Pretrained Language Model for Financial Domain (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Raj Shah, Kunal Chawla, Dheeraj Eidnani, Agam Shah, Wendi Du, Sudheer Chava, Natraj Raman, Charese Smiley, Jiaao Chen, Diyi Yang
| Challenge: | Pre-trained language models have shown impressive performance on a variety of tasks and domains. |
| Approach: | They propose a domain specific financial LANGuage model which uses financial keywords and phrases for better masking. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models on a variety of tasks and domains. |
FinDABench: Benchmarking Financial Data Analysis Ability of Large Language Models (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
Shu Liu, Shangqing Zhao, Chenghao Jia, Xinlin Zhuang, Zhaoguang Long, Jie Zhou, Aimin Zhou, Man Lan, Yang Chong
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across a wide range of tasks, but their proficiency and reliability in the specialized domain of financial data analysis remain uncertain. |
| Approach: | FinDABench is a benchmark designed to evaluate the financial data analysis capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) it comprises 15,200 training instances and 8,900 test instances, all meticulously crafted by human experts. |
| Outcome: | FinDABench measures the financial data analysis capabilities of large language models (LLMs) across three dimensions: 1) Core Ability; 2) Analytical Ability; 3) Technical Ability. |