FinDABench: Benchmarking Financial Data Analysis Ability of Large Language Models (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
Shu Liu, Shangqing Zhao, Chenghao Jia, Xinlin Zhuang, Zhaoguang Long, Jie Zhou, Aimin Zhou, Man Lan, Yang Chong
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across a wide range of tasks, but their proficiency and reliability in the specialized domain of financial data analysis remain uncertain. |
| Approach: | FinDABench is a benchmark designed to evaluate the financial data analysis capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) it comprises 15,200 training instances and 8,900 test instances, all meticulously crafted by human experts. |
| Outcome: | FinDABench measures the financial data analysis capabilities of large language models (LLMs) across three dimensions: 1) Core Ability; 2) Analytical Ability; 3) Technical Ability. |
Similar Papers
MultiFinBen: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Multilingual and Multimodal Financial Application (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Xueqing Peng, Lingfei Qian, Yan Wang, Ruoyu Xiang, Yueru He, Yang Ren, Mingyang Jiang, Vincent Jim Zhang, Yuqing Guo, Jeff Zhao, Huan He, Yi Han, Yun Feng, Yuechen Jiang, Yupeng Cao, Haohang Li, Yangyang Yu, Xiaoyu Wang, Penglei Gao, Shengyuan Lin, Keyi Wang, Shanshan Yang, Yilun Zhao, Zhiwei Liu, Peng Lu, Jerry Huang, Suyuchen Wang, Triantafillos Papadopoulos, Polydoros Giannouris, Efstathia Soufleri, Nuo Chen, Zhiyang Deng, Heming Fu, Yijia Zhao, Mingquan Lin, Meikang Qiu, Kaleb E Smith, Arman Cohan, Xiao-Yang Liu, Jimin Huang, Guojun Xiong, Alejandro Lopez-Lira, Xi Chen, Junichi Tsujii, Jian-Yun Nie, Sophia Ananiadou, Qianqian Xie
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations of LLMs in finance are text-only, monolingual, and largely saturated by current models. |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual and multimodal benchmark for evaluating LLMs in real financial contexts. |
| Outcome: | The first expert-annotated multilingual and multimodal benchmark is released . it evaluates 21 leading LLMs and shows they perform better in multilingual settings . |
Are Large Language Models Reliable Reviewers? A Benchmark for Error Detection in Financial Documents (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Ying He, Zhouhong Gu, Zhecheng Hu, Yubo Zhou, Hao Shen, Jiaqing Liang, Zhaoqian Dai, Ma Shuguang, Fei Yu, Yanghua Xiao, Zhixu Li
| Challenge: | Existing LLMs struggle to identify errors in financial documents, a study shows . 18% of financial practitioners make errors daily, one-third make errors several times weekly, and 59% make errors multiple times monthly. |
| Approach: | They introduce FinED-Bench, a publicly available Benchmark for financial error detection . it covers nine real-world financial scenarios and includes over 900 documents in 2025 . supervised fine-tuning can significantly improve the performance of weaker LLMs, they show . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark covers nine real-world financial scenarios and includes over 900 documents reported in 2025 that are unseen by existing language models. |
Is ChatGPT a Financial Expert? Evaluating Language Models on Financial Natural Language Processing (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized general natural language preprocessing tasks, but their performance in financial domains is not evaluated comprehensively. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to evaluate financial language models on financial tasks . they compare performance of auto-encoding language models and ChatGPT . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework compares the performance of auto-encoding language models and the LLM ChatGPT on financial tasks. |
Evaluating Large Language Models with Enterprise Benchmarks (2025.naacl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
Bing Zhang, Mikio Takeuchi, Ryo Kawahara, Shubhi Asthana, Maruf Hossain, Guang-Jie Ren, Kate Soule, Yifan Mai, Yada Zhu
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks lack domain-specific datasets for evaluating large language models . existing benchmarks often lack domain specific datasets, which can be difficult to convert to standardized metrics or regulatory issues. |
| Approach: | They propose to use 25 publicly available domain-specific English benchmarks from diverse domains . they propose to combine a wide range of natural language processing tasks for holistic evaluation . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework includes 25 publicly available domain-specific English benchmarks from diverse enterprise domains like financial services, legal, climate, cyber security, and 2 public Japanese finance benchmarks. |
UCFE: A User-Centric Financial Expertise Benchmark for Large Language Models (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Yuzhe Yang, Yifei Zhang, Yan Hu, Yilin Guo, Ruoli Gan, Yueru He, Mingcong Lei, Xiao Zhang, Haining Wang, Qianqian Xie, Jimin Huang, Honghai Yu, Benyou Wang
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have expanded their potential applications in finance. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to evaluate the ability of large language models to handle financial tasks using human expert evaluations and task-specific interactions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates the ability of large language models to handle complex financial tasks and combines human expert evaluations with dynamic, task-specific interactions to simulate the complexities of evolving financial scenarios. |
DataSciBench: An LLM Agent Benchmark for Data Science (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Dan Zhang, Sining Zhoubian, Min Cai, Fengzu Li, Lekang Yang, Wei Wang, Tianjiao Dong, Ziniu Hu, Jie Tang, Yisong Yue
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on single task, simple evaluation metrics, and readily available ground truth (GT) DataSciBench is built on curated, natural, and challenging prompts with complex evaluation criteria and uncertain GT. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models in data science that integrates LLM-based self-consistency and human verification to ensure accuracy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms open-source models in all metrics and offers rigorous insights into LLM strengths and weaknesses. |
Benchmarking Large Language Models on CFLUE - A Chinese Financial Language Understanding Evaluation Dataset (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have revolutionized natural language processing (NLP) there is an urgent need for new benchmarks to keep pace with the development of LLMs. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess the capability of large language models (LLMs) they use a dataset to provide both knowledge assessment and application assessment . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark provides datasets tailored for knowledge assessment and application assessment. |
CFinBench: A Comprehensive Chinese Financial Benchmark for Large Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Ying Nie, Binwei Yan, Tianyu Guo, Hao Liu, Haoyu Wang, Wei He, Binfan Zheng, Weihao Wang, Qiang Li, Weijian Sun, Yunhe Wang, Dacheng Tao
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance on various NLP tasks, yet their potential in more challenging task like finance, has not been fully explored. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess the financial knowledge of large language models (LLMs) in China. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark is the most comprehensive evaluation benchmark to date for LLMs in finance. |
Fin-Bias: Comprehensive Evaluation for LLM Decision-Making under human bias in Finance Domain (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for large language models (LLMs) are limited to small sample and fail to demonstrate LLM susceptibility to context with potential human bias. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for evaluating LLM investment decision-making when faced with uncertainty and possible human-biased opinions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can herd the explicit bias in context and even exceed human performance in predicting future stock return. |
FinMaster: A Holistic Benchmark for Full-Pipeline Financial Management with Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Junzhe Jiang, Chang Yang, Aixin Cui, Sihan Jin, Yujing Zhang, Yilin Xiao, Ruiyu Wang, Bo Li, Xiao Huang, Danny Dongning Sun, Xinrun Wang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks lack domain-specific data, realistic workflow-level task design, and standardized workflow- level evaluation. |
| Approach: | a new benchmark evaluates large language models on financial management workflows . the global financial services market is projected to grow to $37 trillion by 2027 . |
| Outcome: | a new benchmark for large language models on financial management workflows reveals critical capability gaps . accuracy drops from 90% on basic tasks to 40% on complex scenarios requiring multi-step reasoning . the global financial services market reached $25.8 trillion in 2022 and is projected to grow to $37 trillion by 2027 . |