Papers by Wenwei Zhang

11 papers
ANAH: Analytical Annotation of Hallucinations in Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a comprehensive and fine-grained measurement of the hallucination is crucial for LLMs' wide applications.
Approach: They propose a dataset that offers ANalytical Annotation of Hallucinations in Large Language Models.
Outcome: The proposed dataset can be used to train and evaluate hallucination annotators.
Code Needs Comments: Enhancing Code LLMs with Comment Augmentation (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) require a deep understanding of programming languages and their correlation with natural languages (NLs).
Approach: They propose a data augmentation method that generates comments for existing code and a filtering strategy that filters out code data poorly correlated with natural language.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms the model trained on the augmented data and the model further trained on data without augmentation on two widely-used programming skill benchmarks.
Fake Alignment: Are LLMs Really Aligned Well? (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies on large language models have shown that they are poorly aligned in practice.
Approach: They propose a framework to evaluate safety in large language models . they propose two new metrics to quantify fake alignment and obtain corrected performance estimation.
Outcome: The proposed framework and two metrics show that some models with purported safety are poorly aligned in practice.
CompassVerifier: A Unified and Robust Verifier for LLMs Evaluation and Outcome Reward (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches lack robustness to handle complex edge cases and generalizability across different domains.
Approach: They develop an accurate and lightweight verifier model for evaluation and outcome reward that matches unstructured outputs against standard answers.
Outcome: The proposed model can process multiple answer types including multi-subproblems, formulas, and sequence answers while identifying abnormal/invalid responses.
InternLM-XComposer2.5-Reward: A Simple Yet Effective Multi-Modal Reward Model (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Despite the promising performance of Large Vision Language Models, they sometimes generate incorrect outputs.
Approach: They propose a multi-modal reward model that aligns LVLMs with human preferences.
Outcome: The proposed model achieves excellent results on the latest multi-modal reward model benchmark and shows competitive performance on text-only reward model.
SciExplore: Evaluating Autonomous Agents from Scientific Navigation to Information Integration (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks emphasize general-domain retrieval or static scientific question answering . SciExplore focuses on scientific database navigation, ambiguous literature retrieval, missing reference completion, and cross-source structured knowledge synthesis tasks.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate scientific information-seeking and reasoning capabilities of LLMs and agents.
Outcome: The new benchmark assesses the capabilities of state-of-the-art LLMs and agents in scientific research workflows.
Are Your LLMs Capable of Stable Reasoning? (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation protocols and metrics do not capture the full spectrum of LLM capabilities, especially in complex reasoning tasks.
Approach: They propose a new evaluation metric that continuously assesses model performance across multiple sampling attempts, quantifying both the model’s potential capabilities and operational consistency.
Outcome: The proposed evaluation metric measures model performance across multiple sampling attempts and provides comprehensive insights into their potential capabilities and operational consistency.
MathBench: Evaluating the Theory and Application Proficiency of LLMs with a Hierarchical Mathematics Benchmark (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in large language models have showcased significant improvements in mathematics, but traditional benchmarks like GSM8k offer a unidimensional perspective.
Approach: MathBench is a benchmark that rigorously assesses the mathematical capabilities of large language models.
Outcome: MathBench spans a wide range of mathematical disciplines, offering a detailed evaluation of both theoretical understanding and practical problem-solving skills.
Training Language Models to Critique With Multi-agent Feedback (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: utilizing human annotations can enhance critique ability, but model-generated critiques suffer from inherent flaws due to complexity of critique . a new framework that leverages multi-agent feedback improves critique ability .
Approach: They propose a framework that leverages multi-agent feedback to improve critique ability . they propose to use supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning to improve this capability .
Outcome: The proposed framework improves critique ability in both supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning stages.
Agent-FLAN: Designing Data and Methods of Effective Agent Tuning for Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies focus on prompt engineering or framework scheduling of one/multiple LLMs.
Approach: They propose to integrate LLMs as agents into their training corpus by decomposition and redesigning the training corpu . they propose to use LLM-FLAN to effectively fine-tune LANguage models for Agents by reducing hallucinations.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms prior best models by 3.5% across agent evaluation datasets.
T-Eval: Evaluating the Tool Utilization Capability of Large Language Models Step by Step (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies evaluate the tool utilization ability of large language models based on the final output or only consider the single-step tool calling.
Approach: They propose a new approach to evaluate the tool utilization capability of large language models (LLMs) they decompose the tool usage into multiple sub-processes, including instruction following, planning, reasoning, retrieval, understanding, and review.
Outcome: The proposed model exhibits consistency with the outcome-oriented evaluation and provides a more fine-grained analysis of the capabilities of LLMs.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations