Papers by Kuikun Liu

4 papers
SciExplore: Evaluating Autonomous Agents from Scientific Navigation to Information Integration (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks emphasize general-domain retrieval or static scientific question answering . SciExplore focuses on scientific database navigation, ambiguous literature retrieval, missing reference completion, and cross-source structured knowledge synthesis tasks.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate scientific information-seeking and reasoning capabilities of LLMs and agents.
Outcome: The new benchmark assesses the capabilities of state-of-the-art LLMs and agents in scientific research workflows.
Are Your LLMs Capable of Stable Reasoning? (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation protocols and metrics do not capture the full spectrum of LLM capabilities, especially in complex reasoning tasks.
Approach: They propose a new evaluation metric that continuously assesses model performance across multiple sampling attempts, quantifying both the model’s potential capabilities and operational consistency.
Outcome: The proposed evaluation metric measures model performance across multiple sampling attempts and provides comprehensive insights into their potential capabilities and operational consistency.
Agent-FLAN: Designing Data and Methods of Effective Agent Tuning for Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies focus on prompt engineering or framework scheduling of one/multiple LLMs.
Approach: They propose to integrate LLMs as agents into their training corpus by decomposition and redesigning the training corpu . they propose to use LLM-FLAN to effectively fine-tune LANguage models for Agents by reducing hallucinations.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms prior best models by 3.5% across agent evaluation datasets.
T-Eval: Evaluating the Tool Utilization Capability of Large Language Models Step by Step (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies evaluate the tool utilization ability of large language models based on the final output or only consider the single-step tool calling.
Approach: They propose a new approach to evaluate the tool utilization capability of large language models (LLMs) they decompose the tool usage into multiple sub-processes, including instruction following, planning, reasoning, retrieval, understanding, and review.
Outcome: The proposed model exhibits consistency with the outcome-oriented evaluation and provides a more fine-grained analysis of the capabilities of LLMs.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations