Papers by Yixu Wang

6 papers
A Mousetrap: Fooling Large Reasoning Models for Jailbreak with Chain of Iterative Chaos (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have advanced beyond traditional Large Language Models, yet they pose heightened safety risks.
Approach: They propose a first jailbreak attack targeting Large Reasoning Models . they exploit a Chaos Machine component to transform attack prompts with diverse one-to-one mappings based on the reasoning chain .
Outcome: The proposed attack exploits the unique vulnerabilities of LRMs by integrating a Chaos Machine. success rates of the mousetrap attack are as high as 96%, 86% and 98% respectively.
Flames: Benchmarking Value Alignment of LLMs in Chinese (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks for large language models (LLMs) do not accurately uncover safety vulnerabilities in LLMs.
Approach: They propose a value alignment benchmark called Flames that encompasses both harmlessness principles and a unique morality dimension that integrates specific Chinese values such as harmony.
Outcome: The proposed model performs poorly on Flames, particularly in safety and fairness dimensions.
AgenticEval: Toward Agentic and Self-Evolving Safety Evaluation of Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing static safety evaluation methods are ill-equipped to address dynamic nature of AI risks and evolving regulations, creating a critical safety gap.
Approach: They propose a new paradigm of agentic safety evaluation reframing evaluation as a continuous and self-evolving process rather than a one-time audit.
Outcome: The proposed framework shows a consistent decline in model safety as the evaluation hardens.
Fake Alignment: Are LLMs Really Aligned Well? (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies on large language models have shown that they are poorly aligned in practice.
Approach: They propose a framework to evaluate safety in large language models . they propose two new metrics to quantify fake alignment and obtain corrected performance estimation.
Outcome: The proposed framework and two metrics show that some models with purported safety are poorly aligned in practice.
Probing the Safety Robustness of LLMs in Latent Space (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Despite substantial progress in safety alignment techniques, aligned large language models can still produce unsafe responses under minor internal perturbations.
Approach: They introduce Activation Steering Attack (ASA) and leverage the Negative Log-Likelihood (NLL) as a diagnostic signal to probe the local sensitivity of safety behaviors in latent space.
Outcome: The proposed method is model-agnostic and supervision-free, enabling a general and reproducible diagnostic metric for analyzing safety robustness.
ESC-Eval: Evaluating Emotion Support Conversations in Large Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Emotion Support Conversation (ESC) is a crucial application for reducing stress and providing emotional guidance.
Approach: They re-organize 2,801 role-playing cards to define roles of role-players . they train a specific role- playing model called ESC-Role which behaves more like a confused person than GPT-4 .
Outcome: The proposed model behaves more like a confused person than GPT-4, and the model performs better than GPLs.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations