StructFlowBench: A Structured Flow Benchmark for Multi-turn Instruction Following (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation benchmarks focus on fine-grained constraint satisfaction and domain-specific capability assessment, yet overlook the crucial structural dependencies between dialogue turns that distinguish multi-turn from single-turn interactions. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-turn instruction following benchmark with structural flow modeling that defines an innovative structural flow framework with six fundamental inter-turn relationships. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on a framework with six fundamental inter-turn relationships and is able to analyze and generate specific dialogue flows tailored to specific scenarios. |
Similar Papers
CodeFlowBench: A Multi-turn, Iterative Benchmark for Complex Code Generation (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Modern software development demands code that is maintainable, testable, and scalable by organizing the implementation into modular components with iterative reuse of existing codes. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate LLMs' ability to perform codeflow by reusing existing functions over multiple turns. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that LLMs perform significantly worse in multi-turn codeflow scenarios and that their performance inversely correlates with dependency complexity. |
MT-Bench-101: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Dialogues (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Ge Bai, Jie Liu, Xingyuan Bu, Yancheng He, Jiaheng Liu, Zhanhui Zhou, Zhuoran Lin, Wenbo Su, Tiezheng Ge, Bo Zheng, Wanli Ouyang
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have greatly enhanced dialogue systems, but evaluation of their capabilities remains a challenge. |
| Approach: | They propose a model to evaluate the fine-grained abilities of Large Language Models in multi-turn dialogues. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model evaluates 21 popular chatbots based on MT-Bench-101 . it includes 3 overarching abilities and 13 distinct tasks within multi-turn dialogue scenarios. |
TurnBench-MS: A Benchmark for Evaluating Multi-Turn, Multi-Step Reasoning in Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on single-turn or single-step tasks, failing to capture iterative reasoning in real-world settings. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that evaluates multi-turn, multi-step reasoning through an interactive code-breaking task inspired by the "Turing Machine Board Game" the best model achieves 84% accuracy in Classic mode, but performance drops to 18% in Nightmare mode. |
| Outcome: | The new benchmark evaluates multi-turn, multi-step reasoning through an interactive code-breaking task inspired by the "Turing Machine Board Game" the best model achieves 84% accuracy in Classic mode, but performance drops to 18% in Nightmare mode. |
RMTBench: Benchmarking LLMs Through Multi-Turn User-Centric Role-Playing (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Hao Xiang, Tianyi Tang, Yang Su, Bowen Yu, An Yang, Fei Huang, Yichang Zhang, Yaojie Lu, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han, Jingren Zhou, Junyang Lin, Le Sun
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on character-centric approach and fail to reflect real-world applications. |
| Approach: | RMTBench is a user-centric bilingual role-playing benchmark featuring 80 diverse characters and over 8,000 dialogue rounds. |
| Outcome: | RMTBench features 80 diverse characters and over 8,000 dialogue rounds. |
EIFBENCH: Extremely Complex Instruction Following Benchmark for Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focusing on single-task environments with limited constraints lack the complexity required to fully reflect the evolution of large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose to use a Segment Policy Optimization algorithm to enhance the LLM's ability to accurately fulfill multi-task workflows. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that existing benchmarks lack the complexity required to fully reflect the evolution of large language models. |
One Battle After Another: Probing LLMs’ Limits on Multi-Turn Instruction Following with a Benchmark Evolving Framework (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for instruction-following in multi-topic dialogues are limited to a fixed number of turns, susceptible to saturation and failing to account for users’ interactive experience. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework featuring a three-layer tracking mechanism and a query synthesis agent to mimic sequential user behaviors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing benchmarks in the evaluation of instruction following in multi-topic dialogues and demonstrates deficiencies in failure recovery and fine-grained instruction following. |
MT-Eval: A Multi-Turn Capabilities Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Wai-Chung Kwan, Xingshan Zeng, Yuxin Jiang, Yufei Wang, Liangyou Li, Lifeng Shang, Xin Jiang, Qun Liu, Kam-Fai Wong
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation frameworks focus on single-turn evaluations, overlooking the models’ capabilities in multi-turn interactions. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the multi-turn conversational abilities of large language models (LLMs) by analyzing human-LLM conversations and constructing multi-turned queries for each category using GPT-4. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms open-source models in multi-turn tasks while retaining and recalling historical information. |
MTR-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multi-Turn Reasoning Evaluation (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Xiaoyuan Li, Keqin Bao, Yubo Ma, Moxin Li, Wenjie Wang, Rui Men, Yichang Zhang, Fuli Feng, Dayiheng Liu
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising results in complex reasoning tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a multi-turn reasoning evaluation framework to cover multi-turn interactions with the environments of large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework covers diverse reasoning capabilities, fine-grained difficulty granularity, and necessitates multi-turn interactions with the environments. |
FollowBench: A Multi-level Fine-grained Constraints Following Benchmark for Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yuxin Jiang, Yufei Wang, Xingshan Zeng, Wanjun Zhong, Liangyou Li, Fei Mi, Lifeng Shang, Xin Jiang, Qun Liu, Wei Wang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on evaluating pure response quality, rather than assessing whether the response follows constraints stated in the instruction. |
| Approach: | They propose a Multi-level Fine-grained Constraints Following Benchmark for Large Language Models that adds a single constraint to the initial instruction at each increased level. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can follow instructions with more constraints, and is deemed to have better instruction-following ability. |
MARS-Bench: A Multi-turn Athletic Real-world Scenario Benchmark for Dialogue Evaluation (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Chenghao Yang, Yinbo Luo, Zhoufutu Wen, Qi Chu, Tao Gong, Longxiang Liu, Kaiyuan Zhang, Jianpeng Jiao, Ge Zhang, Wenhao Huang, Nenghai Yu
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely adopted in real-world dialogue applications, but their robustness is criticized all along. |
| Approach: | They propose to use play-by-play text commentary to build a multi-turn athletic real-world scenario dialogue benchmark to evaluate three critical aspects of multi-turned conversations: ultra multi- turn, interactive multi-twist, and cross-turn tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks outperform open-source LLMs on three critical aspects of multi-turn conversations: ultra multi-turned, interactive multi- turn, and cross-turn tasks. |