Papers by Guangtao Zhai

4 papers
One Battle After Another: Probing LLMs’ Limits on Multi-Turn Instruction Following with a Benchmark Evolving Framework (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks for instruction-following in multi-topic dialogues are limited to a fixed number of turns, susceptible to saturation and failing to account for users’ interactive experience.
Approach: They propose a framework featuring a three-layer tracking mechanism and a query synthesis agent to mimic sequential user behaviors.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms existing benchmarks in the evaluation of instruction following in multi-topic dialogues and demonstrates deficiencies in failure recovery and fine-grained instruction following.
Market-Bench: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Economic and Trade Competition (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing LLM benchmarks focus on semantic complexity or quantitative competition, but rarely both simultaneously under economic scarcity.
Approach: They propose a benchmark that evaluates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in economically-relevant tasks through economic and trade competition.
Outcome: The proposed model evaluates the capabilities of large language models in economically-relevant tasks through economic and trade competition.
Redundancy Principles for MLLMs Benchmarks (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Rapid growth of Multi-modality Large Language Models has led to significant redundancy among benchmarks.
Approach: They propose a framework to improve MLLM benchmark design by identifying redundancy at three levels: dimension, instance, and cross-benchmark redundancies.
Outcome: The proposed framework streamlines evaluations and enhances reliability.
OmniAlign-V: Towards Enhanced Alignment of MLLMs with Human Preference (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing open-source multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) focus on enhancing foundational capabilities, leaving a significant gap in human preference alignment.
Approach: They propose a dataset of 200K high-quality training samples featuring diverse images, complex questions, and varied response formats to improve MLLMs’ alignment with human preferences.
Outcome: The proposed dataset of 200K high-quality training samples improves human preference alignment while maintaining or enhancing performance on standard VQA benchmarks.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations