MTR-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multi-Turn Reasoning Evaluation (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Xiaoyuan Li, Keqin Bao, Yubo Ma, Moxin Li, Wenjie Wang, Rui Men, Yichang Zhang, Fuli Feng, Dayiheng Liu
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising results in complex reasoning tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a multi-turn reasoning evaluation framework to cover multi-turn interactions with the environments of large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework covers diverse reasoning capabilities, fine-grained difficulty granularity, and necessitates multi-turn interactions with the environments. |
Similar Papers
MT-Bench-101: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Dialogues (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Ge Bai, Jie Liu, Xingyuan Bu, Yancheng He, Jiaheng Liu, Zhanhui Zhou, Zhuoran Lin, Wenbo Su, Tiezheng Ge, Bo Zheng, Wanli Ouyang
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have greatly enhanced dialogue systems, but evaluation of their capabilities remains a challenge. |
| Approach: | They propose a model to evaluate the fine-grained abilities of Large Language Models in multi-turn dialogues. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model evaluates 21 popular chatbots based on MT-Bench-101 . it includes 3 overarching abilities and 13 distinct tasks within multi-turn dialogue scenarios. |
MT-Eval: A Multi-Turn Capabilities Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Wai-Chung Kwan, Xingshan Zeng, Yuxin Jiang, Yufei Wang, Liangyou Li, Lifeng Shang, Xin Jiang, Qun Liu, Kam-Fai Wong
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation frameworks focus on single-turn evaluations, overlooking the models’ capabilities in multi-turn interactions. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the multi-turn conversational abilities of large language models (LLMs) by analyzing human-LLM conversations and constructing multi-turned queries for each category using GPT-4. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms open-source models in multi-turn tasks while retaining and recalling historical information. |
TurnBench-MS: A Benchmark for Evaluating Multi-Turn, Multi-Step Reasoning in Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on single-turn or single-step tasks, failing to capture iterative reasoning in real-world settings. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that evaluates multi-turn, multi-step reasoning through an interactive code-breaking task inspired by the "Turing Machine Board Game" the best model achieves 84% accuracy in Classic mode, but performance drops to 18% in Nightmare mode. |
| Outcome: | The new benchmark evaluates multi-turn, multi-step reasoning through an interactive code-breaking task inspired by the "Turing Machine Board Game" the best model achieves 84% accuracy in Classic mode, but performance drops to 18% in Nightmare mode. |
MT-Video-Bench: A Holistic Video Understanding Benchmark for Evaluating Multimodal LLMs in Multi-Turn Dialogues (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yaning Pan, Qianqian Xie, Guohui Zhang, Zekun Moore Wang, Yongqian Wen, Yuanxing Zhang, Haoxuan Hu, Zhiyu Pan, Yibing Huang, Zhidong Gan, Yonghong Lin, An Ping, Shihao Li, Yanghai Wang, Tianhao Peng, Jiaheng Liu
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation benchmarks for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) focus on single-turn question answering, overlooking the complexity of multi-turn dialogues in real-world scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a video understanding benchmark for MLLMs in multi-turn dialogues that assesses six core competencies that focus on perceptivity and interactivity. |
| Outcome: | The MT-Video-Bench evaluates 1,000 multi-turn dialogues from diverse domains and reveals significant performance discrepancies and limitations in handling multi-turned video dialogues. |
MARS-Bench: A Multi-turn Athletic Real-world Scenario Benchmark for Dialogue Evaluation (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Chenghao Yang, Yinbo Luo, Zhoufutu Wen, Qi Chu, Tao Gong, Longxiang Liu, Kaiyuan Zhang, Jianpeng Jiao, Ge Zhang, Wenhao Huang, Nenghai Yu
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely adopted in real-world dialogue applications, but their robustness is criticized all along. |
| Approach: | They propose to use play-by-play text commentary to build a multi-turn athletic real-world scenario dialogue benchmark to evaluate three critical aspects of multi-turned conversations: ultra multi- turn, interactive multi-twist, and cross-turn tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks outperform open-source LLMs on three critical aspects of multi-turn conversations: ultra multi-turned, interactive multi- turn, and cross-turn tasks. |
MTR-DuplexBench: Towards a Comprehensive Evaluation of Multi-Round Conversations for Full-Duplex Speech Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on evaluating single-round interactions, neglecting other critical aspects. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate full-duplex speech language models in multi-round settings . they segment continuous full-dual dialogues into discrete turns for evaluation . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark compared full-duplex speech language models with full-dual speech models . the results show that the models perform better in multi-round settings than standard models compared to benchmarks . |
Multi-Task Inference: Can Large Language Models Follow Multiple Instructions at Once? (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are typically trained to follow a single instruction per inference call. |
| Approach: | They introduce a benchmark to evaluate Large language models' ability to follow one instruction per inference call. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model reduces the total inference time by 1.46 times in average since it does not require multiple inference calls. |
RAD-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models’ Capabilities in Retrieval Augmented Dialogues (2025.naacl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks assess LLMs' chat abilities in multi-turn dialogues or their use of retrieval for augmented responses in limited tasks such as knowledge QA or numeric reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate LLMs' capabilities in multi-turn dialogues following retrievals. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates LLMs' ability to perform in multi-turn dialogues following retrievals over 6 representative scenarios. |
URO-Bench: Towards Comprehensive Evaluation for End-to-End Spoken Dialogue Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a lack of comprehensive evaluations for SDMs in speech-to-speech (S2S) scenarios is a major challenge for end-to end spoken dialogue models. |
| Approach: | They propose to provide an extensive evaluation framework for end-to-end spoken dialogue models (SDMs) that includes both cognitive dimensions and paralinguistic cues . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark is divided into two difficulty levels: basic track and pro track, each comprising 20 test sets, evaluating the spoken dialogue model’s abilities in U**nderstanding, **R**easoning, and **O**ral conversation. |
MTR-Suite: A Framework for Evaluating and Synthesizing Conversational Retrieval Benchmarks (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Junhao Ruan, Abudukeyumu Abudula, Bei Li, Yongjing Yin, Xinyu Liu, Kechen Jiao, Xin Chen, Jingang Wang, Xunliang Cai, Tong Xiao, JingBo Zhu
| Challenge: | Existing conversational retrieval benchmarks suffer from costly, sparse human annotation or rigid, unnatural automated heuristics. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for auditing, synthesizing, and benchmarking conversational retrieval. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework is based on three LLM-based auditors and a multi-agent system . it mimics production-style challenges (hard topic switching, verbosity) and offers superior discriminative power. |