Challenge: Existing benchmarks focus on simple synthesized queries that do not reflect real-world complexity, thereby offering limited perspectives in evaluating tool utilization.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate LLMs’ ability in tool utilization within real-world scenarios.
Outcome: The proposed benchmark improves LLMs’ ability in tool utilization within real-world scenarios and eliminates the restriction of pre-defined toolset.

Similar Papers

ACEBench: A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM Tool Usage (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks for evaluating LLMs’ tool usage face several limitations: limited evaluation scenarios, lacking assessments in real multi-turn dialogue contexts; narrow evaluation dimensions, with insufficient detailed assessments of how LLM use tools; and reliance on LLM or real API executions for evaluation, which introduces significant overhead.
Approach: ACEBench is a benchmark for evaluating tool usage in Large Language Models . it categorizes data into three primary types based on evaluation methodology: Normal, Special, and Agent.
Outcome: ACEBench categorizes data into three primary types based on evaluation methodology: Normal, Special, and Agent.
CRITICTOOL: Evaluating Self-Critique Capabilities of Large Language Models in Tool-Calling Error Scenarios (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a number of tools are used to perform complex tasks, but the tool utilization process can cause errors.
Approach: They propose a critique evaluation benchmark for tool learning that analyzes function-calling errors on tool evaluation benchmarks.
Outcome: The proposed critique evaluation benchmark holds diverse tool-use errors with varying complexities, which better reflects real-world scenarios.
Beyond Itinerary Planning—A Real-World Benchmark for Multi-Turn and Tool-Using Travel Tasks (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies on LLM performance on travel planning have shown that existing settings are limited due to limited domain coverage, insufficient modeling of users’ implicit preferences in multi-turn conversations, and a lack of evaluation of agents’ capability boundaries.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate LLMs' planning and tool-use abilities in real-world settings by collecting user queries, user preferences, and tools from real scenarios.
Outcome: The proposed benchmark evaluates agents' capabilities in real-world settings and shows that even advanced models exhibit imbalanced performance across different capabilities.
EASYTOOL: Enhancing LLM-based Agents with Concise Tool Instruction (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: EASYTOOL combines tools from diverse tool documentation into a single tool instruction.
Approach: They propose a framework that transforms tool documentation into a unified tool instruction.
Outcome: EASYTOOL combines extensive tool documentation into a concise tool instruction . it reduces token consumption and improves performance of LLM-based agents .
PlanningArena: A Modular Benchmark for Multidimensional Evaluation of Planning and Tool Learning (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have shown that LLMs can be significantly improved by integrating external tools.
Approach: They propose a framework that integrates external tools into large language models to evaluate their ability to generate action plans.
Outcome: The proposed framework evaluates the ability of large language models to generate action plans and generate action plan templates.
GenTool: Enhancing Tool Generalization in Language Models through Zero-to-One and Weak-to-Strong Simulation (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) can expand their capabilities by integrating external tools.
Approach: They propose a training framework that prepares LLMs for diverse generalization challenges in tool utilization.
Outcome: The proposed framework improves the tool-usage capabilities of LLMs by up to 8B parameters, surpassing GPT-4o.
T-Eval: Evaluating the Tool Utilization Capability of Large Language Models Step by Step (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies evaluate the tool utilization ability of large language models based on the final output or only consider the single-step tool calling.
Approach: They propose a new approach to evaluate the tool utilization capability of large language models (LLMs) they decompose the tool usage into multiple sub-processes, including instruction following, planning, reasoning, retrieval, understanding, and review.
Outcome: The proposed model exhibits consistency with the outcome-oriented evaluation and provides a more fine-grained analysis of the capabilities of LLMs.
Middleware for LLMs: Tools Are Instrumental for Language Agents in Complex Environments (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) are generalist agents capable of operating within complex environments.
Approach: They propose a class of tools that can serve as a middleware layer shielding LLMs from environmental complexity.
Outcome: The proposed tool can shield the LLM from environmental complexity in two representative complex environments.
Enhancing Open-Domain Task-Solving Capability of LLMs via Autonomous Tool Integration from GitHub (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches lack flexibility to address diverse and ever-evolving user queries in open domains.
Approach: They propose to evaluate LLMs on open-domain knowledge that requires tools to solve diverse and ever-evolving user queries.
Outcome: The proposed system outperforms baselines in the open domain task-solving benchmark.
SafeToolBench: Pioneering a Prospective Benchmark to Evaluating Tool Utilization Safety in LLMs (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches fail to fully capture all risks in tool utilization, resulting in financial loss or privacy leaking.
Approach: They propose a framework to assess the safety of LLM tool utilization in a prospective manner, covering malicious user instructions and diverse practical toolsets.
Outcome: The proposed framework significantly enhances LLMs’ self-awareness, enabling a more safer and trustworthy tool utilization.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations