SafeToolBench: Pioneering a Prospective Benchmark to Evaluating Tool Utilization Safety in LLMs (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches fail to fully capture all risks in tool utilization, resulting in financial loss or privacy leaking. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to assess the safety of LLM tool utilization in a prospective manner, covering malicious user instructions and diverse practical toolsets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework significantly enhances LLMs’ self-awareness, enabling a more safer and trustworthy tool utilization. |
Similar Papers
SafeLawBench: Towards Safe Alignment of Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Chuxue Cao, Han Zhu, Jiaming Ji, Qichao Sun, Zhenghao Zhu, Wu Yinyu, Josef Dai, Yaodong Yang, Sirui Han, Yike Guo
| Challenge: | Recent studies indicate that large language models (LLMs) may exhibit risks, including threats to the protection of private data and the generation of hallucinations. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate LLMs from a legal perspective using the SafeLawBench benchmark. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework categorizes safety risks into three levels based on legal standards and includes 24,860 multi-choice questions and 1,106 open-domain question-answering tasks. |
ACEBench: A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM Tool Usage (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Chen Chen, Xinlong Hao, Weiwen Liu, Xu Huang, Xingshan Zeng, Shuai Yu, Dexun Li, Yuefeng Huang, Xiangcheng Liu, Wang Xinzhi, Wu Liu
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for evaluating LLMs’ tool usage face several limitations: limited evaluation scenarios, lacking assessments in real multi-turn dialogue contexts; narrow evaluation dimensions, with insufficient detailed assessments of how LLM use tools; and reliance on LLM or real API executions for evaluation, which introduces significant overhead. |
| Approach: | ACEBench is a benchmark for evaluating tool usage in Large Language Models . it categorizes data into three primary types based on evaluation methodology: Normal, Special, and Agent. |
| Outcome: | ACEBench categorizes data into three primary types based on evaluation methodology: Normal, Special, and Agent. |
Is Safety Standard Same for Everyone? User-Specific Safety Evaluation of Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Yeonjun In, Wonjoong Kim, Kanghoon Yoon, Sungchul Kim, Mehrab Tanjim, Sangwu Park, Kibum Kim, Chanyoung Park
| Challenge: | Extensive benchmarks evaluate LLM safety relying heavily on general standards . no benchmark datasets exist to evaluate the user-specific safety of LLMs . |
| Approach: | a new benchmark is designed to assess user-specific aspect of LLM safety . authors propose a simple remedy based on chain-of-thought to improve user-specified safety. |
| Outcome: | a new benchmark assesses the user-specific aspect of LLM safety . the proposed solution improves user-specified safety by chain-of-thought . |
RoTBench: A Multi-Level Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models in Tool Learning (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Junjie Ye, Yilong Wu, Songyang Gao, Caishuang Huang, Sixian Li, Guanyu Li, Xiaoran Fan, Qi Zhang, Tao Gui, Xuanjing Huang
| Challenge: | Current research emphasizes LLMs’ capacity to utilize tools in well-structured environments while overlooking their stability when confronted with the inevitable noise of the real world. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-level benchmark to evaluate the robustness of large language models in tool learning by establishing five external environments with varying levels of noise. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the GPT-4 model in tool learning in three critical phases: tool selection, parameter identification, and content filling. |
ToolSword: Unveiling Safety Issues of Large Language Models in Tool Learning Across Three Stages (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Junjie Ye, Sixian Li, Guanyu Li, Caishuang Huang, Songyang Gao, Yilong Wu, Qi Zhang, Tao Gui, Xuanjing Huang
| Challenge: | Existing research focuses on enhancing LLMs capabilities through tool utilization. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to investigate safety issues in large language models in tool learning . they propose malicious queries and jailbreak attacks in the input stage . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework investigates six safety scenarios for LLMs in tool learning . the data will be released upon acceptance of the proposed framework . |
Can LLMs Hear the Dogwhistle? (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yifan Liu, Yi Lin, Xinwei Guo, Ziwei Wang, Jiaxin Zhang, Guanhua Chen, Haiyan Wu, Xiangyu Zhao, Xin Yao, Xuetao Wei
| Challenge: | Existing safety benchmarks focus on explicitly harmful content, but ignore context-dependent expressions such as dogwhistles. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for evaluating LLM safety under dogwhistle-driven prompts . their findings expose a blind spot in current safety evaluation practices . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark compared safety performance with toxic terms using dogwhistle-driven prompts. |
UniToolBench: A Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMs in Cross-Domain, Universal Task Automation (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks that focus on manually curated tool graphs lack scalability and diversity across domains. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale, cross-domain benchmark to evaluate LLMs' ability to reason over and utilize interconnected tools for automation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark incorporates automated tool graph construction by formulating link prediction as a probabilistic task, instead of relying on categorical LLM outputs. |
StableToolBench: Towards Stable Large-Scale Benchmarking on Tool Learning of Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Zhicheng Guo, Sijie Cheng, Hao Wang, Shihao Liang, Yujia Qin, Peng Li, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, Yang Liu
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have witnessed remarkable advancements in recent years, prompting the exploration of tool learning. |
| Approach: | They propose a virtual API server and stable evaluation system to assess the stability of large-scale real-time APIs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks demonstrate the stability of the proposed system and its caching system. |
Metric Calculating Benchmark: Code-Verifiable Complicate Instruction Following Benchmark for Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent frontier-level LLMs have saturated many previously difficult benchmarks, leaving little room for further differentiation. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate whether LLMs can execute string-matching NLP metrics by strictly following step-by-step instructions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that they can perform step-by-step execution, instruction adherence, numerical computation, and long-range consistency in handling intermediate results. |
ToolSpectrum: Towards Personalized Tool Utilization for Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches focus on functional tool selection following user instructions while overlooking the critical role of context-aware personalization in tool selection. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate LLMs’ capabilities in personalized tool utilization. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates LLMs' capabilities in personalized tool utilization. |