Papers by Jiawei Zheng
From Isolated Scoring to Collaborative Ranking: A Comparison-Native Framework for LLM-Based Paper Evaluation (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Pujun Zheng, Jiacheng Yao, Jinquan Zheng, Chenyang Gu, Guoxiu He, Jiawei Liu, Yong Huang, Tianrui Guo, Wei Lu
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are currently used to evaluate scientific papers by assigning an absolute score to each paper independently. |
| Approach: | They propose a comparison-native framework for paper evaluation that integrates comparison into both data construction and model learning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves an average relative improvement of 21.8% over the strong baseline DeepReview-14B, while exhibiting robust generalization to five previously unseen datasets. |
Navigating the Infinite Dynamic Web Space: Effective In-Context Exploration via Cognitive Multi-Agent Collaboration (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Guozhao Mo, Yanjiang Liu, Yafei Shi, Jiawei Chen, Yang Li, Yaojie Lu, Hongyu Lin, Ben He, Le Sun, Bo Zheng, Xianpei Han
| Challenge: | Existing methods for dynamic web navigation rely on greedy strategies or value estimation, struggle to achieve effective backtracking and are heavily dependent on proprietary models. |
| Approach: | They propose a cognitive multi-agent collaboration framework that enhances cyberspace exploration capability through In-Context Exploration. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework surpasses the proprietary model Claude-3.5 Sonnet on the WebArena benchmark. |
SubDocTrans: Enhancing Document-level Machine Translation with Plug-and-play Multi-granularity Knowledge Augmentation (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Document translations generated by large language models suffer from poor consistency, weak coherence, and omission errors. |
| Approach: | They propose a document-level machine translation framework that extracts knowledge from documents to produce high-quality translations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves consistency and coherence, reduces omission errors, and mitigates hallucinations. |
MAmmoTH-VL: Eliciting Multimodal Reasoning with Instruction Tuning at Scale (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Jiawei Guo, Tianyu Zheng, Yizhi Li, Yuelin Bai, Bo Li, Yubo Wang, King Zhu, Graham Neubig, Wenhu Chen, Xiang Yue
| Challenge: | Current instruction-tuning datasets focus on simplistic visual question answering tasks, and provide phrase-level answers without any intermediate rationales. |
| Approach: | They propose to use open-source multimodal large language models to train MLLMs on a dataset with 12M instruction-response pairs to elicit CoT reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves state-of-the-art performance on benchmarks such as MathVerse, MMMU-Pro, and MuirBench, and gains improvements of up to 4% on non-reasoning-based benchmarks. |
DPN-LE: Dual Personality Neuron Localization and Editing for Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Lifan Zheng, Xue Yang, Jiawei Chen, Chenyan WU, Jingyuan Zhang, Fanheng Kong, Xinyi Zeng, Xiang Chen, Yu Tian
| Challenge: | Current methods for editing personality traits in large language models can change personalities but reduce performance. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel paradigm for personality editing that locates and edits LLM neurons and enables competitive personality control at inference time. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on LLaMA-3-8B-Instruct and Qwen2.5-7B-instruct show that the proposed approach can improve performance and improve performance. |
Graph Chain-of-Thought: Augmenting Large Language Models by Reasoning on Graphs (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Bowen Jin, Chulin Xie, Jiawei Zhang, Kashob Kumar Roy, Yu Zhang, Zheng Li, Ruirui Li, Xianfeng Tang, Suhang Wang, Yu Meng, Jiawei Han
| Challenge: | Existing studies suggest augmenting LLMs with external text corpora to alleviate hallucination problems. |
| Approach: | They propose to augment large language models with text units retrieved from external knowledge corpora to alleviate the issue. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms baselines on GRBench with three LLMs and shows that iterative reasoning outperformed the baselines. |
ProMind-LLM: Proactive Mental Health Care via Causal Reasoning with Sensor Data (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for mental health risk assessment rely on subjective textual records . however, these uncertainties can cause inconsistent and unreliable predictions . |
| Approach: | They propose a method that integrates objective behavior data alongside subjective mental records for robust mental health risk assessment. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves significant improvements over general LLMs. |
Can Graph Neural Networks Learn Language with Extremely Weak Text Supervision? (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) with CLIP pipeline are difficult because of the scarcity of labeled data and text supervision, different levels of downstream tasks, and conceptual gaps between domains. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-modal prompt learning paradigm to adapt pre-trained GNNs to downstream tasks with weak text supervision. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generalize graphs to unseen classes with weak text supervision. |
LIME: Less Is More for MLLM Evaluation (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
King Zhu, Qianbo Zang, Shian Jia, Siwei Wu, Feiteng Fang, Yizhi Li, Shuyue Guo, Tianyu Zheng, Jiawei Guo, Bo Li, Haoning Wu, Xingwei Qu, Jian Yang, Ruibo Liu, Xiang Yue, Jiaheng Liu, Chenghua Lin, Hamid Alinejad-Rokny, Min Yang, Shiwen Ni, Wenhao Huang, Ge Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing MLLM benchmarks and unified evaluation frameworks cannot accurately and efficiently reflect the ability of MLMLs. |
| Approach: | They propose a semi-automated benchmark curated using a pipeline that filters out uninformative samples and eliminates answer leakage by focusing on tasks that require image-based understanding. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark reduces the number of samples by 76% and evaluation time by 77% while it can more effectively distinguish different models’ abilities. |