RAVR: Reference-Answer-guided Variational Reasoning for Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Experiments show that reinforcement learning (RL) can refine the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) but requires a key prerequisite: the model must already be able to generate high-utility reasoning paths with non-negligible probability. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that uses answer-conditioned reasoning as a variational surrogate for question-only reasoning. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on 11 benchmarks and 3 models show that RAVR reduces hesitation, strengthens conclusion consolidation, and promotes problem-specific strategies in reasoning. |
Similar Papers
Does RLVR Extend Reasoning Boundaries? Investigating Capability Expansion in Vision-Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies suggest that RLVR amplifies behaviors inherent to the pre-training distribution rather than inducing new capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for RLVR that extends the spatial reasoning boundary . they use a mapping framework where the difficulty is precisely regulated by path length and number of turns . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework extends the spatial reasoning boundary on two real-world navigation benchmarks. |
Crossing the Reward Bridge: Expanding Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Across Diverse Domains (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has been effective on structured tasks, but its reliance on simple, rule-based verifiers creates a bottleneck. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that uses a generative verifier to provide soft, probabilistic rewards. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing models up to 10x their size and can be scalable and effective. |
From Data-Centric to Sample-Centric: Enhancing LLM Reasoning via Progressive Optimization (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has recently advanced the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a method that incorporates partial solution prefixes from expert demonstrations to guide the policy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods outperform strong baselines, yielding faster convergence and a higher performance ceiling. |
RL-PLUS: Countering Capability Boundary Collapse of LLMs in Reinforcement Learning with Hybrid-policy Optimization (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yihong Dong, Xue Jiang, Yongding Tao, Huanyu Liu, Kechi Zhang, Lili Mou, Rongyu Cao, Yingwei MA, Jue Chen, Binhua Li, Zhi Jin, Fei Huang, Yongbin Li, Ge Li
| Challenge: | Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward (RLVR) has significantly advanced the complex reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a hybrid-policy optimization approach that synergizes internal exploitation with external data to achieve stronger reasoning capabilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on six math reasoning benchmarks and superior performance on out-of distribution reasoning tasks. |
Don’t Tell the Answer, Truly Guide the Reasoning During RL Rollouts (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Xinyi Wang, Jinyi Han, Zishang Jiang, Tingyun li, Jiaqing Liang, Sihang Jiang, Zhaoqian Dai, Ma Shuguang, Fei Yu, Yanghua Xiao
| Challenge: | Existing methods such as GRPO often break down when task difficulty exceeds the model’s capacity, resulting in sparse rewards and inefficient training. |
| Approach: | They propose to measure the compatibility between external guidance and a model's intrinsic policy by introducing an adaptive framework to enhance reasoning performance while explicitly preserving high Affinity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms baseline models while maintaining high Affinity. |
DARL: Encouraging Diverse Answers for General Reasoning without Verifiers (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent efforts such as RLPR have extended RLVR to general domains, enabling training on broader datasets and achieving improvements over RL PR. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that encourages the generation of diverse answers within a controlled deviation range from the reference while preserving alignment with it. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on 13 benchmarks show that DARL surpasses RLPR in both reasoning accuracy and output diversity. |
Enhancing Efficiency and Exploration in Reinforcement Learning for LLMs (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches allocate an equal number of rollouts to all questions during the RL process, which is inefficient. |
| Approach: | They propose a mechanism for dynamically allocating rollout budgets based on the difficulty of the problems, enabling more efficient RL training. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves response precision while preserving exploratory ability to uncover potential correct pathways. |
Less is More: Improving LLM Reasoning with Minimal Test-Time Intervention (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have focused on test-time scaling to improve reasoning quality but at the cost of efficiency. |
| Approach: | They propose a training-free framework that enhances reasoning accuracy and stability with minimal overhead. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework yields consistent gains across general, coding, and STEM tasks while remaining highly efficient. |
From Problem-Solving to Teaching Problem-Solving: Aligning LLMs with Pedagogy using Reinforcement Learning (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are often optimized for direct question-answering, but their effectiveness is often undermined by strategically withholding answers. |
| Approach: | They propose an online reinforcement learning-based alignment framework that can quickly adapt LLMs into effective tutors using simulated student-tutor interactions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms proprietary models like LearnLM and can be used to enhance interpretability and pedagogical quality. |
ReFT: Reasoning with Reinforced Fine-Tuning (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to improve the generalization of large language models are using Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) this approach does not show sufficient generalization ability because it only relies on the given CoT data. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Chain-of-Thought annotations to train Large Language Models using supervised fine-tuning to improve generalization. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms SFT on GSM8K, MathQA, and SVAMP datasets and shows a superior generalization ability. |