Less is More: Improving LLM Reasoning with Minimal Test-Time Intervention (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have focused on test-time scaling to improve reasoning quality but at the cost of efficiency. |
| Approach: | They propose a training-free framework that enhances reasoning accuracy and stability with minimal overhead. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework yields consistent gains across general, coding, and STEM tasks while remaining highly efficient. |
Similar Papers
An Empirical Study of LLM Reasoning Ability Under Strict Output Length Constraint (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Yi Sun, Han Wang, Jiaqiang Li, Jiacheng Liu, Xiangyu Li, Hao Wen, Yizhen Yuan, Huiwen Zheng, Yan Liang, Yuanchun Li, Yunxin Liu
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are a powerful tool for test-time scaling, but they are often used under time constraints. |
| Approach: | They propose to use LLMs to make models think before answering questions . they also use self-correction and best-of-N decoding to encourage deeper thinking . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models are able to achieve higher inference accuracy with extra inference computation under time constraints. |
Bridging the Language Gaps in Large Language Models with Inference-Time Cross-Lingual Intervention (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to address performance gaps in LLMs rely on pretraining or fine-tuning, which are resource-intensive. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that aligns LLMs' internal representations with those of high-performing languages during inference. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves performance on low-performing (source) languages by aligning their internal representations with those of high-performing languages during inference. |
MUR: Momentum Uncertainty guided Reasoning for Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Hang Yan, Fangzhi Xu, Rongman Xu, Yifei Li, Jian Zhang, Haoran Luo, Xiaobao Wu, Anh Tuan Luu, Haiteng Zhao, Qika Lin, Jun Liu
| Challenge: | Existing methods for optimizing reasoning quality are limited by overthinking. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that allocates thinking budgets to critical reasoning steps by tracking and aggregating step-wise uncertainty over time. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces computation by over 45% on average while improving accuracy by 0.33–3.46%. |
Z1: Efficient Test-time Scaling with Code (2025.emnlp-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) can achieve enhanced complex problem-solving through test-time computing scaling, but this often entails longer contexts and numerous reasoning token costs. |
| Approach: | They propose an efficient test-time scaling method that trains LLMs on code-related reasoning trajectories and a novel Shifted Thinking Window to mitigate overthinking overhead. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces overthinking overhead while maintaining performance. |
Learning from Cognition: Enhancing RL Efficiency for LLM Reasoning via Hierarchical Metacognitive Decomposition and Refinement (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Zexu Sun, Yongcheng Zeng, Erxue Min, Heyang Gao, Bokai Ji, Dugang Liu, Xing Tang, Xiuqiang He, Xu Chen
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models have demonstrated notable inferential capacities via reinforcement learning (RL) however, “zero-RL” approaches relying on fixed prompt templates introduce substantial sampling inefficiencies for weak LLMs. |
| Approach: | They propose a hierarchical metacognitive RL framework that decomposes zero-accuracy problems into subproblems and prompts the policy to refine answers by referencing previous wrong solutions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves sample utilization and sample efficiency and accelerates convergence compared to baselines. |
Step-level Verifier-guided Hybrid Test-Time Scaling for Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Kaiyan Chang, Yonghao Shi, Chenglong Wang, Hang Zhou, Chi Hu, Xiaoqian Liu, Yingfeng Luo, Yuan Ge, Tong Xiao, JingBo Zhu
| Challenge: | Recent training-based TTS methods, such as continued reinforcement learning, have surged in popularity, while training-free TTS approaches are gradually fading from prominence. |
| Approach: | They propose a fine-grained sequential scaling method guided by process verification that integrates training-free TTS methods with other classical parallel scaling methods at the step level. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on five instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) show that training-free TTS methods can extend reasoning performance boundaries. |
Mitigating Language Confusion through Inference-time Intervention (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to address the problem of language confusion are incontext learning and supervised fine-tuning (SFT) however, they consume context window space and require extensive data collection. |
| Approach: | They propose a language-sensitive intervention that detects and assesses language confusion without additional complex mechanisms. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method detects language confusion and assesses content quality without additional complex mechanisms. |
Guided by Gut: Efficient Test-Time Scaling with Reinforced Intrinsic Confidence (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Guided by Gut (GG) is an efficient self-guided TTS framework for Large Language Models (LLMs) that performs step-by-step reasoning at a low cost without any reward models or verifiers. |
| Approach: | They propose a self-guided TTS framework that enables LLMs to perform step-by-step reasoning at a low cost without any reward models or verifiers. |
| Outcome: | Empirical evaluations show that GG performs better than TTS with PRMs while reducing GPU memory usage by up to 10. |
Prompting Test-Time Scaling Is A Strong LLM Reasoning Data Augmentation (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models exhibit strong reasoning when guided by chain-of-thought exemplars . collecting large, high-quality reasoning datasets remains laborious and resource-intensive . |
| Approach: | They propose a prompt-space data augmentation framework for enhancing LLM reasoning . they use a pool of 90 randomly selected reasoning instances to elicit diverse reasoning trajectories . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves accuracy over small-data benchmarks and generalization on out-of-domain reasoning evaluations. |
TT-SI: Self-Improving LLM Agents with Test-Time Training (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for language model fine-tuning are expensive and inefficient . existing methods rarely assess whether a training sample provides novel information . |
| Approach: | They propose a test-time self-improvement algorithm that generates a sample that model struggles with . they also explore Test-Time Distillation, which leverages 'stronger supervisors' |
| Outcome: | The proposed algorithm improves performance with +5.48% absolute accuracy gain on average across benchmarks. |