EDU-CIRCUIT-HW: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models on Real-World University-Level STEM Student Handwritten Solutions (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are a promising tool for traditional education but lack authentic and domain-specific benchmarks to accurately interpret student handwritten solutions. |
| Approach: | They propose to use MLLMs to interpret unconstrained STEM student handwritten solutions with intertwined mathematical formulas, diagrams, and textual reasoning to bridge this gap. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can detect and rectify recognition errors with minimal human intervention on unseen student solutions. |
Similar Papers
EduMARS: Can Vision-Language Models Grade Like Teachers? Benchmarking Multimodal, Rubric-Based Assessment on Chinese K-12 Answers (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for automated grading of student work fail to evaluate real student responses . existing models fail to assess real student work, especially on cognitively demanding tasks . |
| Approach: | They propose a multimodal benchmark for rubric-aligned evaluation of real Chinese K-12 student answers. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves performance and interpretability of existing models on EduMARS . existing models fail to perform on real-world, cognitively demanding tasks, authors say . |
Beyond Ranking: Fine-Grained Diagnostics and Self-Improvement for MLLMs (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current paradigms rely on holistic scoring and static leaderboards to disentangle fine-grained competencies. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to shift the focus from ranking to fine-grained diagnosis. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework surpasses the strongest baseline by 7.92%. |
CORDIAL: Can Multimodal Large Language Models Effectively Understand Coherence Relationships? (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on assessing factual and logical correctness in downstream tasks with limited emphasis on evaluating MLLMs’ ability to interpret pragmatic cues and intermodal relationships. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Coherence Relations to assess MLLMs' ability to perform multimodal discourse analysis using different prompting strategies. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model fails to match the performance of simple classifier-based benchmarks on 10+ MLLMs using different prompting strategies. |
EduVidQA: Generating and Evaluating Long-form Answers to Student Questions based on Lecture Videos (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This paper explores using Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to respond to student questions from online lectures . MLLM is a novel question answering task of real world significance . |
| Approach: | They propose to use Multimodal Large Language Models to automatically respond to student questions from online lectures by using a dataset of 5252 question-answer pairs from 296 computer science videos. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can fine tune and fine tune questions from 296 computer science videos and show that students' preferences are important to the task. |
Can Vision-Language Models Evaluate Handwritten Math? (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have significantly enhanced the ability to interpret both textual and visual data. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess VLMs’ ability to detect, localize and correct errors in handwritten mathematical content. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark covers over 2,200 handwritten math solutions from 609 manually curated problems from grades 7-12 with intentionally introduced perturbations. |
From Multimodal LLM to Human-level AI: Modality, Instruction, Reasoning, Efficiency and beyond (2024.lrec-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This tutorial aims to deliver a comprehensive review of cutting-edge research in MLLMs. |
| Approach: | This tutorial will review cutting-edge research in MLLMs and examine the impact of ML in learning and reasoning. |
| Outcome: | This course will review cutting-edge research in MLLMs and examine the impact of ML models on learning, learning, and multimodal reasoning. |
MAmmoTH-VL: Eliciting Multimodal Reasoning with Instruction Tuning at Scale (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Jiawei Guo, Tianyu Zheng, Yizhi Li, Yuelin Bai, Bo Li, Yubo Wang, King Zhu, Graham Neubig, Wenhu Chen, Xiang Yue
| Challenge: | Current instruction-tuning datasets focus on simplistic visual question answering tasks, and provide phrase-level answers without any intermediate rationales. |
| Approach: | They propose to use open-source multimodal large language models to train MLLMs on a dataset with 12M instruction-response pairs to elicit CoT reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves state-of-the-art performance on benchmarks such as MathVerse, MMMU-Pro, and MuirBench, and gains improvements of up to 4% on non-reasoning-based benchmarks. |
Exploring Response Uncertainty in MLLMs: An Empirical Evaluation under Misleading Scenarios (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Yunkai Dang, Mengxi Gao, Yibo Yan, Xin Zou, Yanggan Gu, Jungang Li, Jingyu Wang, Peijie Jiang, Aiwei Liu, Jia Liu, Xuming Hu
| Challenge: | Existing studies have focused mainly on visual–textual misalignment, leaving largely unexplored the MLLMs’ ability to preserve an original correct answer when confronted with misleading information. |
| Approach: | They propose a two-stage evaluation pipeline to quantify the response uncertainty phenomenon by eliciting each model’s original response on unperturbed inputs and injecting explicit (false-answer hints) and implicit (contextual contradictions) misleading instructions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model overturns a correct answer in 65% of cases after receiving a single deceptive cue. |
Multimodal Large Language Models for Text-rich Image Understanding: A Comprehensive Review (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Pei Fu, Tongkun Guan, Zining Wang, Zhentao Guo, Chen Duan, Hao Sun, Boming Chen, Qianyi Jiang, Jiayao Ma, Kai Zhou, Junfeng Luo
| Challenge: | Recent advances in vision-language models have unified perception and understanding tasks within Visual Question Answering paradigms. |
| Approach: | They propose to outline timeline, architecture, and pipeline of nearly all TIU MLLMs and review their performance on mainstream benchmarks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models perform well on mainstream benchmarks and are compared with other models. |
PCA-Bench: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models in Perception-Cognition-Action Chain (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Liang Chen, Yichi Zhang, Shuhuai Ren, Haozhe Zhao, Zefan Cai, Yuchi Wang, Peiyi Wang, Xiangdi Meng, Tianyu Liu, Baobao Chang
| Challenge: | a new multimodal decision-making benchmark evaluates the integrated capabilities of multimodal large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose a multimodal decision-making benchmark for evaluating MLLMs . they propose an automatic evaluation protocol to assess 10 prevalent ML models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark improves performance of multimodal large language models in three scenarios . the model is required to integrate multiple capabilities to make accurate decisions . |