Beyond Templates: Dynamic Adaptation of Reasoning Demonstrations via Feasibility-Aware Exploration (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing reasoning datasets that are designed for powerful LLMs often lead to degraded performance when directly applied to weaker models. |
| Approach: | They propose a data adaptation framework that bridges the capability gap between expert reasoning trajectories and diverse SLMs by employing a selective imitation strategy guided by step-wise adaptability estimation via solution simulation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves generalization and data efficiency over static fine-tuning and can be applied to large models with limited model capacity. |
Similar Papers
Reasoning in Flux: Enhancing Large Language Models Reasoning through Uncertainty-aware Adaptive Guidance (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Zhangyue Yin, Qiushi Sun, Qipeng Guo, Zhiyuan Zeng, Xiaonan Li, Junqi Dai, Qinyuan Cheng, Xuanjing Huang, Xipeng Qiu
| Challenge: | Extensive experiments across various reasoning tasks demonstrate that UAG not only enhances the reasoning abilities of LLMs but consistently outperforms several strong baselines with minimal computational overhead. |
| Approach: | They propose an approach to guide LLMs onto an accurate and reliable trajectory by identifying and adjusting uncertainty signals within each step of the reasoning chain. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms strong baselines and outperformed strong models with minimal computational overhead. |
Learning Like Humans: Advancing LLM Reasoning Capabilities via Adaptive Difficulty Curriculum Learning and Expert-Guided Self-Reformulation (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Extensive experiments on challenging mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that these human-inspired strategies synergistically and significantly enhance performance. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Adaptive Difficulty Curriculum Learning and Expert-Guided Self-Reformulation to improve model performance. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that the proposed strategies synergistically and significantly improve performance over the baseline model. |
AdapTime: Enabling Adaptive Temporal Reasoning in Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yimin Deng, Yejing Wang, Zhenxi Lin, Zichuan Fu, Guoshuai Zhao, Derong Xu, Yefeng Zheng, Xiangyu Zhao, Xian Wu, Li Zhu, Xueming Qian
| Challenge: | Existing methods for temporal reasoning are limited and apply a fixed pipeline to all questions. |
| Approach: | They propose an adaptive temporal reasoning method that dynamically executes reasoning steps based on context and task requirements. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on two temporal QA benchmarks show the proposed method works. |
MUR: Momentum Uncertainty guided Reasoning for Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Hang Yan, Fangzhi Xu, Rongman Xu, Yifei Li, Jian Zhang, Haoran Luo, Xiaobao Wu, Anh Tuan Luu, Haiteng Zhao, Qika Lin, Jun Liu
| Challenge: | Existing methods for optimizing reasoning quality are limited by overthinking. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that allocates thinking budgets to critical reasoning steps by tracking and aggregating step-wise uncertainty over time. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces computation by over 45% on average while improving accuracy by 0.33–3.46%. |
AdapThink: Adaptive Thinking Preferences for Reasoning Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent research has highlighted a significant inefficiency associated with the slow thinking paradigm . models often overthink simple tasks while underthinking complex challenges . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for adaptive reasoning preference control that dynamically adjusts reflection preferences based on group-level distributional statistics of reasoning length and reflection intensity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework reduces average response length by 17.1%-21.4% while improving performance by 6.12-6.59 points under 32K token budgets. |
Tandem: Riding Together with Large and Small Language Models for Efficient Reasoning (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Zichuan Fu, Xian Wu, Guojing Li, Yejing Wang, Yijun Chen, Zhao Zihao, Luo Yixuan, Hanyu Yan, Yefeng Zheng, Xiangyu Zhao
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have catalyzed the rise of reasoningintensive inference paradigms, where models perform explicit step-by-step reasoning before generating final answers. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-small LLM collaboration framework that synergizes large and small language models to achieve high-quality reasoning with significantly reduced computational cost. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms the mentor LLM while preserving the benefits of the thinking paradigm of LLMs. |
Beyond Rejection Sampling: Trajectory Fusion for Scaling Mathematical Reasoning (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) fine-tuned using rejection sampling retain only correct reasoning trajectories . however, this paradigm treats supervision as a binary filter that systematically excludes teacher-generated errors, leaving a gap in how reasoning failures are modeled during training. |
| Approach: | They propose a fine-tuning strategy that reframes rejection sampling as a structured supervision construction process. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms RFT on multiple math benchmarks while retaining only correct reasoning trajectories. |
Meta-Reasoner: Dynamic Guidance for Optimized Inference-time Reasoning in Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances on prompting and post-training have enabled LLMs to perform step-wise reasoning tasks, but they tend to explore unproductive solution paths without effective backtracking or strategy adjustment. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that empowers LLMs to “think about how to think” and dynamically adapts reasoning strategies in real-time. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms previous SOTA methods by 9-12% in accuracy while reducing inference time by 28-35% under the same compute budget. |
From Implicit Exploration to Structured Reasoning: Guideline and Refinement for LLMs (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models rely on implicit exploration, which leads to unstable reasoning paths and lack of error correction. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that shifts from implicit exploration to structured reasoning through guideline and refinement. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms strong baselines on the Big-Bench Hard benchmark. |
Democratizing Reasoning Ability: Tailored Learning from Large Language Model (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Zhaoyang Wang, Shaohan Huang, Yuxuan Liu, Jiahai Wang, Minghui Song, Zihan Zhang, Haizhen Huang, Furu Wei, Weiwei Deng, Feng Sun, Qi Zhang
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) exhibit impressive emergent abilities in natural language processing, but their democratization is hindered due to huge computation requirements and closed-source nature. |
| Approach: | They propose a tailored learning approach to distill the exclusive reasoning ability to smaller LMs to facilitate democratization. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach enables the democratization of the exclusive reasoning ability by leveraging the black-box model as a reasoning teacher. |