MultiChallenge: A Realistic Multi-Turn Conversation Evaluation Benchmark Challenging to Frontier LLMs (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Kaustubh Deshpande, Ved Sirdeshmukh, Johannes Baptist Mols, Lifeng Jin, Ed-Yeremai Hernandez-Cardona, Dean Lee, Jeremy Kritz, Willow E. Primack, Summer Yue, Chen Xing
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation frameworks for large language models have limited coverage for multi-turn conversations . multi-turned conversations require accurate instruction following, context allocation, and in-context reasoning at the same time. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to conduct multi-turn conversations with humans. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks achieve near perfect scores on existing benchmarks but only a 41.4% accuracy on the frontier models. |
Similar Papers
MT-Eval: A Multi-Turn Capabilities Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Wai-Chung Kwan, Xingshan Zeng, Yuxin Jiang, Yufei Wang, Liangyou Li, Lifeng Shang, Xin Jiang, Qun Liu, Kam-Fai Wong
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation frameworks focus on single-turn evaluations, overlooking the models’ capabilities in multi-turn interactions. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the multi-turn conversational abilities of large language models (LLMs) by analyzing human-LLM conversations and constructing multi-turned queries for each category using GPT-4. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms open-source models in multi-turn tasks while retaining and recalling historical information. |
BotChat: Evaluating LLMs’ Capabilities of Having Multi-Turn Dialogues (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Haodong Duan, Jueqi Wei, Chonghua Wang, Hongwei Liu, Yixiao Fang, Songyang Zhang, Dahua Lin, Kai Chen
| Challenge: | Modern Large Language Models (LLMs) facilitate high-quality, multi-turn dialogues with humans, but human-based evaluation of such a capability requires substantial manual effort. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate LLMs' ability to emulate human-like, multi-turn conversations using an LLM-centric approach. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model emulates human-like, multi-turn conversations using an LLM-centric approach. |
Audio MultiChallenge: A Multi-Turn Evaluation of Spoken Dialogue Systems on Natural Human Interaction (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Advait Gosai, Tyler Vuong, Utkarsh Tyagi, Steven Li, Wenjia You, Miheer Bavare, Arda Uçar, Zhongwang Fang, Brian Jang, Bing Liu, Yunzhong He
| Challenge: | End-to-end (E2E) spoken dialogue systems are replacing cascaded pipelines for voice-based human-AI interaction. Existing benchmarks evaluate these systems on synthetic speech and single-turn tasks, leaving multi-turn conversational ability underexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose an open-source benchmark to evaluate spoken dialogue systems under natural multi-turn interaction patterns. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model fails on the highest-performing model with 54.65% pass rate. |
RMTBench: Benchmarking LLMs Through Multi-Turn User-Centric Role-Playing (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Hao Xiang, Tianyi Tang, Yang Su, Bowen Yu, An Yang, Fei Huang, Yichang Zhang, Yaojie Lu, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han, Jingren Zhou, Junyang Lin, Le Sun
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on character-centric approach and fail to reflect real-world applications. |
| Approach: | RMTBench is a user-centric bilingual role-playing benchmark featuring 80 diverse characters and over 8,000 dialogue rounds. |
| Outcome: | RMTBench features 80 diverse characters and over 8,000 dialogue rounds. |
FB-Bench: A Fine-Grained Multi-Task Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs’ Responsiveness to Human Feedback (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing research focuses on benchmarking LLMs in single-turn dialogues, neglecting the nuanced nature of human feedback within real-world usage scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a fine-grained, multi-task benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs’ responsiveness to human feedback under real-world usage scenarios in Chinese. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that human feedback can significantly impact LLMs’ responsiveness in real-world usage scenarios. |
MARS-Bench: A Multi-turn Athletic Real-world Scenario Benchmark for Dialogue Evaluation (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Chenghao Yang, Yinbo Luo, Zhoufutu Wen, Qi Chu, Tao Gong, Longxiang Liu, Kaiyuan Zhang, Jianpeng Jiao, Ge Zhang, Wenhao Huang, Nenghai Yu
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely adopted in real-world dialogue applications, but their robustness is criticized all along. |
| Approach: | They propose to use play-by-play text commentary to build a multi-turn athletic real-world scenario dialogue benchmark to evaluate three critical aspects of multi-turned conversations: ultra multi- turn, interactive multi-twist, and cross-turn tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks outperform open-source LLMs on three critical aspects of multi-turn conversations: ultra multi-turned, interactive multi- turn, and cross-turn tasks. |
MT-Bench-101: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Dialogues (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Ge Bai, Jie Liu, Xingyuan Bu, Yancheng He, Jiaheng Liu, Zhanhui Zhou, Zhuoran Lin, Wenbo Su, Tiezheng Ge, Bo Zheng, Wanli Ouyang
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have greatly enhanced dialogue systems, but evaluation of their capabilities remains a challenge. |
| Approach: | They propose a model to evaluate the fine-grained abilities of Large Language Models in multi-turn dialogues. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model evaluates 21 popular chatbots based on MT-Bench-101 . it includes 3 overarching abilities and 13 distinct tasks within multi-turn dialogue scenarios. |
TurnBench-MS: A Benchmark for Evaluating Multi-Turn, Multi-Step Reasoning in Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on single-turn or single-step tasks, failing to capture iterative reasoning in real-world settings. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that evaluates multi-turn, multi-step reasoning through an interactive code-breaking task inspired by the "Turing Machine Board Game" the best model achieves 84% accuracy in Classic mode, but performance drops to 18% in Nightmare mode. |
| Outcome: | The new benchmark evaluates multi-turn, multi-step reasoning through an interactive code-breaking task inspired by the "Turing Machine Board Game" the best model achieves 84% accuracy in Classic mode, but performance drops to 18% in Nightmare mode. |
One Battle After Another: Probing LLMs’ Limits on Multi-Turn Instruction Following with a Benchmark Evolving Framework (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for instruction-following in multi-topic dialogues are limited to a fixed number of turns, susceptible to saturation and failing to account for users’ interactive experience. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework featuring a three-layer tracking mechanism and a query synthesis agent to mimic sequential user behaviors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing benchmarks in the evaluation of instruction following in multi-topic dialogues and demonstrates deficiencies in failure recovery and fine-grained instruction following. |
MTR-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multi-Turn Reasoning Evaluation (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Xiaoyuan Li, Keqin Bao, Yubo Ma, Moxin Li, Wenjie Wang, Rui Men, Yichang Zhang, Fuli Feng, Dayiheng Liu
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising results in complex reasoning tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a multi-turn reasoning evaluation framework to cover multi-turn interactions with the environments of large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework covers diverse reasoning capabilities, fine-grained difficulty granularity, and necessitates multi-turn interactions with the environments. |