Icon2: Aligning Large Language Models Using Self-Synthetic Preference Data via Inherent Regulation (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Qiyuan Chen, Hongsen Huang, Qian Shao, Jiahe Chen, Jintai Chen, Hongxia Xu, Renjie Hua, Ren Chuan, Jian Wu
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) require high quality preference datasets to align with human preferences. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that leverages inherent regulation of LLMs’ representation space for efficient and tailored preference dataset construction, named Icon2. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves performance on benchmarks like AlpacaEval 2.0 and Arena-Hard while reducing computational costs by up to 48.1%. |
Similar Papers
CodecLM: Aligning Language Models with Tailored Synthetic Data (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Zifeng Wang, Chun-Liang Li, Vincent Perot, Long Le, Jin Miao, Zizhao Zhang, Chen-Yu Lee, Tomas Pfister
| Challenge: | Recent work on generating diverse instructions and applying LLM to increase instruction complexity neglects downstream use cases. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for generating high-quality synthetic data for LLM alignment with different downstream instruction distributions and LLMs. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on four open-domain instruction using the proposed framework validate the effectiveness of CodecLM over the current state-of-the-art. |
Comparing Bad Apples to Good Oranges Aligning Large Language Models via Joint Preference Optimization (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that acquiring human preferences by comparing generations is not effective for large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose a preference optimization objective that elicits preferences jointly over the instruction-response pairs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms prior preference optimizations by 5.2% and 3.3% in summarization and open-ended dialogue datasets. |
Aligning Large Language Models via Fully Self-Synthetic Data (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) require expensive human-annotated datasets and proprietary models like GPT-4 to annotate preference pairs. |
| Approach: | They propose a self-synthetic framework for LLM alignment where all training data, including prompts (i.e., user queries), responses, and preferences, are generated by the model itself. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework enhances the model’s chat capabilities on standard benchmarks like AlpacaEval 2.0 while maintaining strong performance on downstream objective tasks. |
Aligning Large Language Models with Implicit Preferences from User-Generated Content (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Zhaoxuan Tan, Zheng Li, Tianyi Liu, Haodong Wang, Hyokun Yun, Ming Zeng, Pei Chen, Zhihan Zhang, Yifan Gao, Ruijie Wang, Priyanka Nigam, Bing Yin, Meng Jiang
| Challenge: | Existing preference learning methods rely heavily on curated data from humans or advanced LLMs, which is costly and difficult to scale. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that leverages implicit preferences in unlabeled user-generated content to generate preference data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework transforms user-generated content into user queries and generates responses from the policy model. |
Aligning Large Language Models with Human Preferences through Representation Engineering (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Wenhao Liu, Xiaohua Wang, Muling Wu, Tianlong Li, Changze Lv, Zixuan Ling, Zhu JianHao, Cenyuan Zhang, Xiaoqing Zheng, Xuanjing Huang
| Challenge: | Existing methods for achieving this alignment involve employing reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) Existing approaches involve using RLHF to fine-tune LLMs based on human labels . however, RLRF is susceptible to instability during fine- tuning and presents challenges in implementation. |
| Approach: | They propose to use reinforcement learning from human feedback to fine-tune large language models with human preferences to achieve precise control of model behavior. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that RAHF can be used to capture and manipulate representations to align with a broad spectrum of human preferences or values rather than being confined to a single concept or function. |
Disentangling Preference Representation and Text Generation for Efficient Individual Preference Alignment (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Human values are inherently diverse, making it insufficient to align LLMs solely with general preferences. |
| Approach: | They propose a flexible paradigm for individual preference alignment that disentangles preference representation from text generation in LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method produces aligned quality and better than PEFT-based methods while reducing training time for each new individual preference by 80% to 90%. |
CodeArena: Evaluating and Aligning CodeLLMs on Human Preference (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Jian Yang, Jiaxi Yang, Wei Zhang, Jin Ke, Yibo Miao, Lei Zhang, Liqun Yang, Zeyu Cui, Yichang Zhang, Zhoujun Li, Binyuan Hui, Junyang Lin
| Challenge: | Code large language models (codeLLMs) focus on synthesizing the correct code snippet, ignoring the alignment with human preferences. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark code-based on 40 categories and 44 programming languages to emulate real-world coding tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that open-source code LLMs perform better than open-sourced ones. |
Aligning Large Language Models through Synthetic Feedback (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Currently, alignment learning requires significant human demonstrations and feedback from proprietary LLMs such as ChatGPT. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that uses synthetic feedback to align large language models to human values without extensive human annotations and proprietary LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms open-source models on human-annotated demonstrations in alignment benchmarks. |
Dissecting Human and LLM Preferences (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study shows that human and Large Language Model preferences are important for model fine-tuning and evaluation. |
| Approach: | They dissect the preferences of human and 32 different Large Language Models to understand their quantitative composition. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is compared with 32 different large language models using real-world user-model conversations. |
MetaAlign: Align Large Language Models with Diverse Preferences during Inference Time (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to align large language models with human preferences often result in a static alignment that cannot account for the diversity of human preferences in practical applications. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to help large language models dynamically align with various explicit or implicit preferences specified at inference time. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can help LLMs dynamically align with various explicit or implicit preferences specified at the inference stage, validating the feasibility of MetaAlign. |