Comparing Bad Apples to Good Oranges Aligning Large Language Models via Joint Preference Optimization (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that acquiring human preferences by comparing generations is not effective for large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose a preference optimization objective that elicits preferences jointly over the instruction-response pairs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms prior preference optimizations by 5.2% and 3.3% in summarization and open-ended dialogue datasets. |
Similar Papers
Dissecting Human and LLM Preferences (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study shows that human and Large Language Model preferences are important for model fine-tuning and evaluation. |
| Approach: | They dissect the preferences of human and 32 different Large Language Models to understand their quantitative composition. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is compared with 32 different large language models using real-world user-model conversations. |
CM-Align: Consistency-based Multilingual Alignment for Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current large language models (LLMs) show a significant performance gap in alignment between English and other languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a consistency-based method to construct high-quality multilingual preference data for improving multilingual alignment. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is based on three LLMs and three common tasks and shows that it performs better than current methods. |
Aligning LLMs with Individual Preferences via Interaction (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on LLMs alignment focus on generalizing their behavior to generalized values such as helpfulness, harmlessness, and honesty. |
| Approach: | They train large language models to "interact to align" to implicitly infer user preferences . they use a multi-turn preference dataset to generate a personalized alignment . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method enables dynamic, personalized alignment via interaction with a multi-turn preference dataset. |
A Survey on Personalized Alignment—The Missing Piece for Large Language Models in Real-World Applications (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, yet their transition to real-world applications reveals a critical limitation: the inability to adapt to individual preferences while maintaining alignment with universal human values. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that enables LLMs to adapt their behavior within ethical boundaries based on individual preferences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework analyzes implementation approaches and evaluates their effectiveness across various scenarios. |
MPPO: Multi Pair-wise Preference Optimization for LLMs with Arbitrary Negative Samples (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
Shuo Xie, Fangzhi Zhu, Jiahui Wang, Lulu Wen, Wei Dai, Xiaowei Chen, Junxiong Zhu, Kai Zhou, Bo Zheng
| Challenge: | Existing preference optimization methods such as DPO and KTO are inherently derived from PPO, requiring a reference model that adds GPU memory resources and relies heavily on abundant preference data. |
| Approach: | They propose an algorithm that leverages the average likelihood of model responses to fit the reward function and maximizes the utilization of preference data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed algorithm outperforms DPO, ORPO, and SimPO on MT-Bench and Arena-Hard. |
Disentangling Preference Representation and Text Generation for Efficient Individual Preference Alignment (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Human values are inherently diverse, making it insufficient to align LLMs solely with general preferences. |
| Approach: | They propose a flexible paradigm for individual preference alignment that disentangles preference representation from text generation in LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method produces aligned quality and better than PEFT-based methods while reducing training time for each new individual preference by 80% to 90%. |
Learning Preference Model for LLMs via Automatic Preference Data Generation (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing training methods for large language models rely on human-annotated data. |
| Approach: | They propose to learn the preference model for LLMs via automatic preference data generation (AutoPM) using HHH-guided preference data, they show reliability and potential . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach enables LLMs to learn human preferences and align with human values. |
From 1,000,000 Users to Every User: Scaling Up Personalized Preference for User-level Alignment (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current approaches to align large language models assume uniform human preferences, overlooking the diversity inherent in human populations. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for scalable personalized alignment of large language models . they establish a preference space characterizing psychological and behavioral dimensions . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves on existing methods with an average of 17.06% accuracy gain across four benchmarks and a strong adaptation capability to novel preferences. |
Expectation Preference Optimization: Reliable Preference Estimation for Improving the Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pairwise preference optimization is used to improve supervised fine-tuning performance of large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose an algorithm that takes pairs of sample groups instead of single samples for preference learning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed algorithm outperforms baseline methods on reasoning benchmarks. |
Icon2: Aligning Large Language Models Using Self-Synthetic Preference Data via Inherent Regulation (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Qiyuan Chen, Hongsen Huang, Qian Shao, Jiahe Chen, Jintai Chen, Hongxia Xu, Renjie Hua, Ren Chuan, Jian Wu
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) require high quality preference datasets to align with human preferences. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that leverages inherent regulation of LLMs’ representation space for efficient and tailored preference dataset construction, named Icon2. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves performance on benchmarks like AlpacaEval 2.0 and Arena-Hard while reducing computational costs by up to 48.1%. |