AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Wanjun Zhong, Ruixiang Cui, Yiduo Guo, Yaobo Liang, Shuai Lu, Yanlin Wang, Amin Saied, Weizhu Chen, Nan Duan
| Challenge: | Traditional benchmarks for evaluating foundation models often fail to accurately represent their general abilities for human-centric tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a bilingual benchmark to assess foundation models in the context of human-centric standardized exams such as college entrance exams, law school admission tests, and math competitions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark exceeds the average human performance on SAT, LSAT, and math competitions with 95% accuracy and 92.5% on the Chinese college entrance English exam. |
Similar Papers
OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problems (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Chaoqun He, Renjie Luo, Yuzhuo Bai, Shengding Hu, Zhen Thai, Junhao Shen, Jinyi Hu, Xu Han, Yujie Huang, Yuxiang Zhang, Jie Liu, Lei Qi, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Multimodal Models have exceeded general human capabilities in various tasks. |
| Approach: | They present an Olympiad-level bilingual multimodal scientific benchmark featuring 8,476 problems from Olympiad level mathematics and physics competitions. |
| Outcome: | The best performing model, GPT-4V, attains an average score of 17.97% on OlympiadBench, with a mere 10.74% in physics, highlighting the benchmark rigor and the intricacy of physical reasoning. |
Dr.Academy: A Benchmark for Evaluating Questioning Capability in Education for Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recognizing LLMs’ capability to generate educational content can lead to advances in automated and personalized learning. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate the questioning capability in education as a teacher of large language models by evaluating their generated educational questions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generate educational content that aligns with human perspectives and is more apt as an interdisciplinary teacher. |
LLM-Powered Benchmark Factory: Reliable, Generic, and Efficient (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Peiwen Yuan, Shaoxiong Feng, Yiwei Li, Xinglin Wang, Yueqi Zhang, Jiayi Shi, Chuyi Tan, Boyuan Pan, Yao Hu, Kan Li
| Challenge: | Using generic and efficient benchmark generators, human annotators are limited by inefficiency . current benchmark generator methods rely on seed signals, leading to long cycles and high costs . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to evaluate LLMs as generic benchmark generators and integrate them as BenchMaker. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves comparable performance to human-annotated benchmarks on most metrics. |
GPT-Fathom: Benchmarking Large Language Models to Decipher the Evolutionary Path towards GPT-4 and Beyond (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing LLM leaderboards often reference scores reported in other papers without consistent settings and prompts, which may encourage cherry-picking favored settings and for better results. |
| Approach: | They propose an open-source and reproducible LLM evaluation suite built on top of OpenAI Evals that systematically evaluates 10+ leading LLMs and OpenAI’s legacy models on 20+ curated benchmarks across 7 capability categories. |
| Outcome: | The evaluation suite is built on top of OpenAI Evals and evaluates 10+ leading LLMs and OpenAI’s legacy models on 20+ curated benchmarks across 7 capability categories. |
Evaluating Large Language Models on Wikipedia-Style Survey Generation (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Fan Gao, Hang Jiang, Rui Yang, Qingcheng Zeng, Jinghui Lu, Moritz Blum, Tianwei She, Yuang Jiang, Irene Li
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that large language models can perform well in general tasks, but their effectiveness and limitations in domainspecific tasks remain unclear. |
| Approach: | They examine the proficiency of Large Language Models (LLMs) in generating succinct survey articles specific to the niche field of NLP in computer science. |
| Outcome: | The LLMs perform better in generating succinct survey articles specific to the niche field of NLP in computer science, compared to human-authored surveys, but they exhibit bias in evaluation. |
Physics: Benchmarking Foundation Models on University-Level Physics Problem Solving (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a benchmark for university-level physics problem solving contains 1,297 expert-annotated problems . a proprietary model, o3-mini, achieves only 59.9% accuracy, highlighting fundamental weaknesses in scientific reasoning, conceptual understanding, and mathematical precision. |
| Approach: | They introduce Physics, a benchmark for university-level physics problem solving. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves only 59.9% accuracy on the most advanced model, o3-mini . the proposed model is a powerful tool for evaluating models on advanced problems . |
MERA: A Comprehensive LLM Evaluation in Russian (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Alena Fenogenova, Artem Chervyakov, Nikita Martynov, Anastasia Kozlova, Maria Tikhonova, Albina Akhmetgareeva, Anton Emelyanov, Denis Shevelev, Pavel Lebedev, Leonid Sinev, Ulyana Isaeva, Katerina Kolomeytseva, Daniil Moskovskiy, Elizaveta Goncharova, Nikita Savushkin, Polina Mikhailova, Anastasia Minaeva, Denis Dimitrov, Alexander Panchenko, Sergey Markov
| Challenge: | Recent advances in foundation models have led to the emergence of powerful Large Language Models (LLMs), which showcase unprecedented tasksolving capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to evaluate FMs and LMs in fixed zero- and few-shot instruction settings that can be extended to other modalities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation methodology includes an open-source code base and a leaderboard with a submission system. |
Does GPT-4 pass the Turing test? (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 seem well designed for Turing's game. |
| Approach: | They evaluated GPT-4 in a public online Turing test and found it passed in 49.7% of games. |
| Outcome: | The best-performing GPT-4 prompt passed in 49.7% of games, outperforming ELIZA (22%) and GPT-3.5 (20%) participants’ decisions were based mainly on linguistic style (35%) and socioemotional traits (27%). |
Foundational Autoraters: Taming Large Language Models for Better Automatic Evaluation (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | evaluating large language models' output is difficult due to the high cost of human evaluation. |
| Approach: | They propose a family of foundational large autorater models that train on over 100 quality assessment tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms models on 8 of 12 autorater benchmarks on 53 quality assessment tasks. |
Evaluation Metrics in the Era of GPT-4: Reliably Evaluating Large Language Models on Sequence to Sequence Tasks (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) evaluation is a patchy and inconsistent landscape . established automatic evaluation metrics are poor surrogates, correlating weakly with human judgement. |
| Approach: | They propose to use both automatic and human evaluation to evaluate generative LLMs on three NLP benchmarks: text summarisation, text simplification and grammatical error correction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms many popular models according to human reviewers on the majority of metrics, while scoring much worse when using classic automatic evaluation metrics. |