OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problems (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Chaoqun He, Renjie Luo, Yuzhuo Bai, Shengding Hu, Zhen Thai, Junhao Shen, Jinyi Hu, Xu Han, Yujie Huang, Yuxiang Zhang, Jie Liu, Lei Qi, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Multimodal Models have exceeded general human capabilities in various tasks. |
| Approach: | They present an Olympiad-level bilingual multimodal scientific benchmark featuring 8,476 problems from Olympiad level mathematics and physics competitions. |
| Outcome: | The best performing model, GPT-4V, attains an average score of 17.97% on OlympiadBench, with a mere 10.74% in physics, highlighting the benchmark rigor and the intricacy of physical reasoning. |
Similar Papers
Challenging the Boundaries of Reasoning: An Olympiad-Level Math Benchmark for Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation frameworks for large reasoning models are saturated by a lack of reliable and verifiable benchmarks. |
| Approach: | They propose a rigorously curated, Olympiad-level math benchmark comprising 350 problems, each with parallel English and Chinese versions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark unifies two evaluation paradigms and offers 150 problems formalized in Lean 4 for rigorous process-level evaluation. |
MathBench: Evaluating the Theory and Application Proficiency of LLMs with a Hierarchical Mathematics Benchmark (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Hongwei Liu, Zilong Zheng, Yuxuan Qiao, Haodong Duan, Zhiwei Fei, Fengzhe Zhou, Wenwei Zhang, Songyang Zhang, Dahua Lin, Kai Chen
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have showcased significant improvements in mathematics, but traditional benchmarks like GSM8k offer a unidimensional perspective. |
| Approach: | MathBench is a benchmark that rigorously assesses the mathematical capabilities of large language models. |
| Outcome: | MathBench spans a wide range of mathematical disciplines, offering a detailed evaluation of both theoretical understanding and practical problem-solving skills. |
IndicGenBench: A Multilingual Benchmark to Evaluate Generation Capabilities of LLMs on Indic Languages (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | IndicGenBench is the largest benchmark for evaluating large language models on user-facing generation tasks across a diverse set of 29 Indic languages . |
| Approach: | They evaluate large language models on user-facing generation tasks across 29 languages . they use human curation to provide multi-way parallel evaluation data for many under-represented languages a github repository . |
| Outcome: | IndicGenBench is the largest benchmark for evaluating LLMs on user-facing generation tasks across a diverse set of 29 Indic languages covering 13 scripts and 4 language families. |
AMO-Bench: Large Language Models Still Struggle in High School Math Competitions (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Junlin Liu, Shengnan An, Shuang Zhou, Dan Ma, Yehao Lin, Xinxuan Lv, Xuanlin Wang, Xiaoyu Li, Ziwen Wang, Xuezhi Cao, Xunliang Cai
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for mathematical reasoning are becoming less effective due to performance saturation. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a mathematical reasoning benchmark with Olympiad difficulty to evaluate top-tier LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks are cross-validated by experts to meet IMO difficulty standards and entirely original problems to prevent performance leakages from data memorization. |
ScholarBench: A Bilingual Benchmark for Abstraction, Comprehension, and Reasoning Evaluation in Academic Contexts (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | ScholarBench evaluates domain-specific knowledge of large language models (LLMs) prior benchmarks lack the scalability to handle complex academic tasks. |
| Approach: | ScholarBench evaluates the academic reasoning ability of large language models . the benchmark is constructed through a three-step process . |
| Outcome: | ScholarBench evaluates the academic reasoning ability of large language models . the benchmark comprises 5,031 examples in Korean and 5,309 examples in English . |
Almieyar-Oryx-BloomBench: A Bilingual Multimodal Benchmark for Cognitively Informed Evaluation of Vision-Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Mohammad Mahdi Abootorabi, Omid Ghahroodi, Anas Madkoor, Marzia Nouri, Doratossadat Dastgheib, Ehsaneddin Asgari
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations focus on piecemeal or disconnected tasks, obscuring critical cognitive weaknesses and providing little insight for targeted improvement. |
| Approach: | They propose a bilingual, cognitively human-grounded multimodal benchmark for VLMs that evaluates six levels of cognition through carefully designed image–question–answer tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework ensures scalability, cultural inclusivity, and linguistic fidelity. |
C²RBench: A Chinese Complex Reasoning Benchmark for Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks often fail to capture complex multi-step reasoning demands inherent in real-world scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate multi-step, multimodal advanced reasoning of large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark exceeds existing benchmarks in cognitive complexity and accuracy by over 90% . it features 1,115 carefully curated Chinese tasks organized into eight domain-specific subsets . evaluations of 20 LLMs and 24 multimodal large language models reveal critical performance gaps . |
Have LLMs Advanced Enough? A Challenging Problem Solving Benchmark For Large Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | The performance of large language models (LLMs) on existing reasoning benchmarks has significantly improved over the past decade. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark dataset for evaluating the problem solving abilities of large language models (LLMs) they curate 515 challenging problems from the highly competitive IIT JEE-Advanced exam. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better on open-source and proprietary models than the current model, but with techniques like self-consistency, self-refinement and chain-of-thought prompting. |
GAOKAO-MM: A Chinese Human-Level Benchmark for Multimodal Models Evaluation (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing datasets focus on primary perception abilities and commonsense knowledge, or have low level of text comprehension difficulty, which are insufficient to reflect comprehensive capabilities of large vision-language models. |
| Approach: | They propose a multimodal benchmark based on the Chinese College Entrance Examination (GAOKAO) which sets human-level requirements for the model’s abilities, including perception, understanding, knowledge and reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model derives from native Chinese context and sets human-level requirements for its abilities, including perception, understanding, knowledge and reasoning. |
AlignMMBench: Evaluating Chinese Multimodal Alignment in Large Vision-Language Models (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on basic abilities using nonverbal methods, such as yes-no and multiple-choice questions. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that provides more nuanced evaluations of alignment capabilities for large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) they use a rule-calibrated evaluator that exceeds GPT-4's evaluation ability and a “alignment score” to assess the robustness and stability of models across diverse prompts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark covers 13 tasks across three categories and includes both single-turn and multi-turn dialogue scenarios. |