ConceptMath: A Bilingual Concept-wise Benchmark for Measuring Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yanan Wu, Jie Liu, Xingyuan Bu, Jiaheng Liu, Zhanhui Zhou, Yuanxing Zhang, Chenchen Zhang, ZhiqiBai ZhiqiBai, Haibin Chen, Tiezheng Ge, Wanli Ouyang, Wenbo Su, Bo Zheng
| Challenge: | ConceptMath evaluates concept-wise mathematical reasoning of Large Language Models (LLMs) Existing benchmarks that evaluate general mathematical reasoning with an average accuracy fail to probe the fine-grained failure modes of mathematical reasoning on specific datasets. |
| Approach: | They introduce a bilingual, fine-grained benchmark that evaluates concept-wise mathematical reasoning of Large Language Models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks evaluate concept-wise mathematical reasoning of Large Language Models with concept-based accuracies. |
Similar Papers
HighMATH: Evaluating Math Reasoning of Large Language Models in Breadth and Depth (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Yan Liu, Minghui Zhang, Bojian Xiong, Yifan Xiao, Yinong Sun, Yating Mei, Longyu Zeng, Jingchao Yang, Yang Wang, Deyi Xiong
| Challenge: | a gap in math models' accuracy has been widened with the development of large language models (LLMs) . a new study aims to bridge this gap by evaluating a set of high-level math reasoning models . |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate large language models on existing math benchmarks to bridge this gap . they collect 5,293 problems from Chinese senior high school mathematics exams . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on o1-like models and a high-level model. |
TMATH A Dataset for Evaluating Large Language Models in Generating Educational Hints for Math Word Problems (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being applied in education, showing significant potential in personalized instruction, student feedback, and intelligent tutoring systems (ITSs). |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset specifically designed to evaluate LLMs’ ability to generate high-quality hints for Math Word Problems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset shows that LLMs can generate more accurate and contextually appropriate educational hints for math word problems without offering direct answers. |
MathBench: Evaluating the Theory and Application Proficiency of LLMs with a Hierarchical Mathematics Benchmark (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Hongwei Liu, Zilong Zheng, Yuxuan Qiao, Haodong Duan, Zhiwei Fei, Fengzhe Zhou, Wenwei Zhang, Songyang Zhang, Dahua Lin, Kai Chen
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have showcased significant improvements in mathematics, but traditional benchmarks like GSM8k offer a unidimensional perspective. |
| Approach: | MathBench is a benchmark that rigorously assesses the mathematical capabilities of large language models. |
| Outcome: | MathBench spans a wide range of mathematical disciplines, offering a detailed evaluation of both theoretical understanding and practical problem-solving skills. |
ScholarBench: A Bilingual Benchmark for Abstraction, Comprehension, and Reasoning Evaluation in Academic Contexts (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | ScholarBench evaluates domain-specific knowledge of large language models (LLMs) prior benchmarks lack the scalability to handle complex academic tasks. |
| Approach: | ScholarBench evaluates the academic reasoning ability of large language models . the benchmark is constructed through a three-step process . |
| Outcome: | ScholarBench evaluates the academic reasoning ability of large language models . the benchmark comprises 5,031 examples in Korean and 5,309 examples in English . |
HellaSwag-Pro: A Large-Scale Bilingual Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs in Commonsense Reasoning (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Xiaoyuan Li, Moxin Li, Rui Men, Yichang Zhang, Keqin Bao, Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, Dayiheng Liu, Junyang Lin
| Challenge: | Existing studies show that large language models are robust in commonsense reasoning . however, some variations in questions can lead to incorrect responses . |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale bilingual benchmark consisting of 11,200 cases . they conduct extensive experiments on 41 representative LLMs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark systematically evaluates the robustness of large language models in commonsense reasoning. |
Challenging the Boundaries of Reasoning: An Olympiad-Level Math Benchmark for Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation frameworks for large reasoning models are saturated by a lack of reliable and verifiable benchmarks. |
| Approach: | They propose a rigorously curated, Olympiad-level math benchmark comprising 350 problems, each with parallel English and Chinese versions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark unifies two evaluation paradigms and offers 150 problems formalized in Lean 4 for rigorous process-level evaluation. |
MathMist: A Parallel Multilingual Benchmark Dataset for Mathematical Problem Solving and Reasoning (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
Mahbub E Sobhani, Md. Faiyaz Abdullah Sayeedi, Tasnim Mohiuddin, Md Mofijul Islam, Swakkhar Shatabda
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks primarily focus on English or a narrow subset of high-resource languages, leaving significant gaps in assessing multilingual and cross-lingual mathematical reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a parallel multilingual benchmark for mathematical problem solving and reasoning that encompasses 2,890 parallel Bangla-English gold standard artifacts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model encompasses 2,890 parallel Bangla-English gold standard artifacts, totaling 30K aligned question–answer pairs across thirteen languages, representing high-, medium-, and low-resource linguistic settings. |
MMATH: A Multilingual Benchmark for Mathematical Reasoning (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a benchmark for multilingual complex reasoning spans 374 high-quality math problems across 10 typologically diverse languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for multilingual complex reasoning across 10 languages . they show reasoning in English and answering in target languages can enhance performance . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark demonstrates that models with high-quality reasoning can perform in multiple languages. |
PyraMathBench: Evaluating and Improving Mathematical Capability in Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Numerical reasoning is ubiquitous in scientific research and financial analysis, but few benchmarks evaluate them by integrating numerical processing and mathematical reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a numerically-integrated hierarchical benchmark with 27,215 questions derived from 7,404 math word problems that spans 4 key cognitive aspects, 14 subcategories, and 2 modalities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves Qwen-2.5 score with SOLVE and IRPO training. |
UTMath: A Benchmark for Math Evaluation with Unit Test (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prevailing benchmarks for mathematical reasoning include MATH and AIME . predicated on single-instantiation problems with fixed numbers, these models leave generalization on isomorphic problem variants untested. |
| Approach: | They propose a mathematical reasoning benchmark that quantifies solution accuracy and solution space generality. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model solves 1,053 problems spanning 9 mathematical domains . the best-performing model solved only 32.57% of the problems . |