PyraMathBench: Evaluating and Improving Mathematical Capability in Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Numerical reasoning is ubiquitous in scientific research and financial analysis, but few benchmarks evaluate them by integrating numerical processing and mathematical reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a numerically-integrated hierarchical benchmark with 27,215 questions derived from 7,404 math word problems that spans 4 key cognitive aspects, 14 subcategories, and 2 modalities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves Qwen-2.5 score with SOLVE and IRPO training. |
Similar Papers
MathBench: Evaluating the Theory and Application Proficiency of LLMs with a Hierarchical Mathematics Benchmark (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Hongwei Liu, Zilong Zheng, Yuxuan Qiao, Haodong Duan, Zhiwei Fei, Fengzhe Zhou, Wenwei Zhang, Songyang Zhang, Dahua Lin, Kai Chen
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have showcased significant improvements in mathematics, but traditional benchmarks like GSM8k offer a unidimensional perspective. |
| Approach: | MathBench is a benchmark that rigorously assesses the mathematical capabilities of large language models. |
| Outcome: | MathBench spans a wide range of mathematical disciplines, offering a detailed evaluation of both theoretical understanding and practical problem-solving skills. |
Exposing Numeracy Gaps: A Benchmark to Evaluate Fundamental Numerical Abilities in Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Haoyang Li, Xuejia Chen, Zhanchao Xu, Darian Li, Nicole Hu, Fei Teng, Yiming Li, Luyu Qiu, Chen Jason Zhang, Li Qing, Lei Chen
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on linguistic competence or structured mathematical problem-solving, neglecting fundamental numerical reasoning required in real-world scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate numerical capabilities for large language models . they use a dataset to assess number recognition, arithmetic operations, contextual retrieval, comparison, summary, and multi-step reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates six fundamental numerical capabilities: number recognition, arithmetic operations, contextual retrieval, comparison, summary, and multi-step reasoning. |
HighMATH: Evaluating Math Reasoning of Large Language Models in Breadth and Depth (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Yan Liu, Minghui Zhang, Bojian Xiong, Yifan Xiao, Yinong Sun, Yating Mei, Longyu Zeng, Jingchao Yang, Yang Wang, Deyi Xiong
| Challenge: | a gap in math models' accuracy has been widened with the development of large language models (LLMs) . a new study aims to bridge this gap by evaluating a set of high-level math reasoning models . |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate large language models on existing math benchmarks to bridge this gap . they collect 5,293 problems from Chinese senior high school mathematics exams . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on o1-like models and a high-level model. |
SMART: Evaluating LLMs’ Mathematical Reasoning via a Human Cognitive Process-Inspired Benchmark (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methods focus on the final answer or on the intermediate reasoning steps, overlooking its inherently multi-stage and multi-dimensional nature. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that decomposes mathematical problem-solving into four cognitive dimensions and introduces dimension-specific tasks to measure their cognitive processes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model decomposes mathematical problem-solving into four cognitive dimensions and introduces dimension-specific tasks to measure their cognitive processes. |
Do LLMs Overthink Basic Math Reasoning? Benchmarking the Accuracy-Efficiency Tradeoff in Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) achieve impressive performance on complex benchmarks yet sometimes fail on basic math reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the efficiency of reasoning in large language models . they formalize the accuracy-verbosity tradeoff and introduce the overthinking score . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well on complex benchmarks but fails on basic math reasoning . the proposed model generates 18 more tokens while achieving lower accuracy . |
Rationales for Answers to Simple Math Word Problems Confuse Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies show that large language models have advanced mathematical problem-solving abilities in grade school math word problems. |
| Approach: | They propose to combine fine-tuning and prompt-based methods to improve performance . they propose to use a hybrid algorithm to fine- tune LLMs on specific tasks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve performance on the proposed reasoning process evaluation benchmarks. |
Have LLMs Advanced Enough? A Challenging Problem Solving Benchmark For Large Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | The performance of large language models (LLMs) on existing reasoning benchmarks has significantly improved over the past decade. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark dataset for evaluating the problem solving abilities of large language models (LLMs) they curate 515 challenging problems from the highly competitive IIT JEE-Advanced exam. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better on open-source and proprietary models than the current model, but with techniques like self-consistency, self-refinement and chain-of-thought prompting. |
Can Large Language Models Win the International Mathematical Games? (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Alessio Cocchieri, Luca Ragazzi, Giuseppe Tagliavini, Lorenzo Tordi, Antonella Carbonaro, Gianluca Moro
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong mathematical reasoning abilities, even in visual contexts. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark of 2,183 high-quality mathematical problems in an open-ended format that enables a structured evaluation of LLMs’ mathematical and logical reasoning abilities. |
| Outcome: | The new benchmark spans seven age groups and a skill-based taxonomy and enables a structured evaluation of LLMs’ mathematical and logical reasoning abilities. |
MATHSENSEI: A Tool-Augmented Large Language Model for Mathematical Reasoning (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | TALMs have been successfully employed in question-answering benchmarks, but their efficacy on complex mathematical reasoning benchmarks are open research questions. |
| Approach: | They propose a tool-augmented large language model for mathematical reasoning that enhances the skillset of large language models (LLMs) by 13.5%. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves better accuracy and better knowledge retrieval performance than existing tools. |
WirelessMathBench: A Mathematical Modeling Benchmark for LLMs in Wireless Communications (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive results across a broad array of tasks, yet their capacity for complex, domain-specific mathematical reasoning remains underexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate Large Language Models on mathematical modeling challenges to wireless communications engineering. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates LLMs on mathematical modeling challenges to wireless communications engineering. |