Papers by Jonibek Mansurov

10 papers
M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detection (2024.eacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models generate fluent responses to user queries, but they are also susceptible to misuse in journalism, education, and academia.
Approach: They propose a large-scale benchmark for machine-generated text detection that is a multi-generator, multi-domain, and multi-lingual corpus.
Outcome: The proposed system can detect machine-generated text and pinpoint misuse . the proposed system is based on a large-scale benchmark dataset .
Statement-Tuning Enables Efficient Cross-lingual Generalization in Encoder-only Models (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models excel in zero-shot and few-shot tasks, but their architecture makes them difficult to use.
Approach: They adapt Large Language Models (LLMs) for zero-shot generalization using Statement Tuning . they find encoders can achieve zero- shot cross-lingual generalization .
Outcome: The proposed model generalizes well across languages while being more efficient.
Qorǵau: Evaluating Safety in Kazakh-Russian Bilingual Contexts (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to generate harmful content, posing risks to users.
Approach: They propose a dataset specifically designed for safety evaluation in Kazakh and Russian . they use a bilingual context in Kazakhstan where both Kazakh (a low-resource language) and Russian (a high-resourced language)
Outcome: The proposed dataset is designed for safety evaluation in Kazakh and Russian . it shows that both multilingual and language-specific LLMs perform better than others .
Data Laundering: Artificially Boosting Benchmark Results through Knowledge Distillation (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies show that language model benchmarks are vulnerable to manipulation and exploitation.
Approach: They propose a method that allows the covert transfer of benchmark-specific knowledge through seemingly legitimate intermediate training steps.
Outcome: The proposed method can achieve significant improvements in accuracy without developing reasoning capabilities.
M4GT-Bench: Evaluation Benchmark for Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detection (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) have brought an unprecedented surge in machine-generated text (MGT) societal implications are posed by their potential misuse and lack of training data.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to detect machine-generated text in multiple languages . they use multi-domain and multi-generator corpus to identify which model generated the text .
Outcome: The proposed benchmark compares a multilingual, multi-domain and multi-generator corpus of MGTs with human-generated content.
KazMMLU: Evaluating Language Models on Kazakh, Russian, and Regional Knowledge of Kazakhstan (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Kazakh language remains underrepresented in the field of natural language processing despite the country's population exceeding twenty million . however, there is a lack of dedicated models and benchmark evaluations specifically tailored to Kazakh languages.
Approach: They propose to create a dataset specifically designed for Kazakh language with 23,000 questions sourced from authentic educational materials and manually validated by native speakers and educators.
Outcome: The first MMLU-style dataset specifically designed for Kazakh language.
Is Human-Like Text Liked by Humans? Multilingual Human Detection and Preference Against AI (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Prior studies have shown that distinguishing text generated by Large Language Models from human-written text is challenging for humans and often no better than random guessing.
Approach: They conduct extensive case study to determine the upper bound of human detection accuracy.
Outcome: The findings challenge previous conclusions on human detection accuracy across languages and domains.
LLM-DetectAIve: a Tool for Fine-Grained Machine-Generated Text Detection (2024.emnlp-demo)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a large number of machine-generated texts are often hard to distinguish between human-written and machine-generated text . this raises concerns about potential misuse, especially within educational and academic domains .
Approach: They propose a system that can detect whether a text is human-written or machine-generated . they use a fine-grained classification schema to identify the use of machine-generated text .
Outcome: The proposed system can distinguish between human-written and machine-generated text . it can detect attempts to obfuscate the fact that a text was machine- generated .
SEACrowd: A Multilingual Multimodal Data Hub and Benchmark Suite for Southeast Asian Languages (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Southeast Asia (SEA) is home to over 1,300 indigenous languages and 671 million people . prevailing AI models suffer from a significant lack of representation of texts, images, and audio datasets from SEA .
Approach: They propose to provide a resource center that provides standardized corpora in nearly 1,000 SEA languages across three modalities.
Outcome: a new benchmark assesses the quality of AI models on 36 SEA languages across 13 tasks . the results highlight the importance of SEA as a culturally diverse region .

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations