Challenge: Recent advances in mobile Graphical User Interface (GUI) agents highlight the growing need for comprehensive evaluation benchmarks.
Approach: They propose an online benchmark with 1080 tasks from 80 Chinese apps that measures task execution, complex reasoning, noise robustness and auto-eval framework with a reset mechanism.
Outcome: The proposed benchmark measures task execution, complex reasoning, and noise robustness of agents by including 5 subsets, which set multiple evaluation dimensions.

Similar Papers

AgencyBench: Benchmarking the Frontiers of Autonomous Agents in 1M-Token Real-World Contexts (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks focus on single agentic capability, failing to capture long-horizon real-world scenarios.
Approach: They propose a benchmark that evaluates 6 agentic capabilities across 32 real-world scenarios.
Outcome: Experiments show that closed-source models outperform open-source model (48.4% vs 32.1%) integrating models with advanced scaffolds to form autonomous agents is a paradigm shift.
FedMABench: Benchmarking Mobile GUI Agents on Decentralized Heterogeneous User Data (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Mobile GUI agents have attracted tremendous research participation recently. traditional approaches to mobile agent training rely on centralized data collection.
Approach: They propose a benchmark for federated training and evaluation of mobile GUI agents . they find that federation algorithms consistently outperform local training .
Outcome: The first benchmark for federated training and evaluation of mobile GUI agents is released . it features 6 datasets with 30+ subsets, 8 federation algorithms, 10+ base models, and over 800 apps across 5 categories .
HammerBench: Fine-Grained Function-Calling Evaluation in Real Mobile Assistant Scenarios (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Evaluating the performance of LLMs in multi-turn interactions presents significant challenges due to the complexity and variability of user behavior.
Approach: They propose a benchmark framework for assessing LLMs’ function-calling capabilities in multi-turn dialogues.
Outcome: The proposed framework is based on a dataset derived from popular mobile apps and anonymized user logs.
WindowsWorld: A Process-Centric Benchmark of Autonomous GUI Agents in Professional Cross-Application Environments (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing GUI agents perform poorly on multi-application tasks, stalling at early sub-goals.
Approach: They propose to assess GUI Agents on complex multi-step tasks that mirror real-world professions.
Outcome: The proposed benchmark contains 181 tasks with an average of 5.0 sub-goals across 17 common desktop applications, of which 78% are inherently multi-application.
TransBench: Breaking Barriers for Transferable Graphical User Interface Agents in Dynamic Digital Environments (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing GUI agents struggle to adapt to dynamic and interconnected nature of real-world digital environments, authors show .
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate the transferability of GUI agents across three key dimensions . transBench includes 15 app categories with diverse functionalities .
Outcome: The proposed benchmark shows that existing GUI agents struggle to adapt to dynamic, interconnected environments.
Mobile-Bench: An Evaluation Benchmark for LLM-based Mobile Agents (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks for LLM-based mobile agents are insufficient to evaluate their capabilities.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate LLM-based mobile agents' planning capabilities . they expand UI operations by incorporating 103 APIs to accelerate task completion .
Outcome: The proposed benchmarks are based on 103 collected APIs and real user queries . the data is categorized into three distinct groups: SAST, SAMT, and MAMT .
SmartBench: Is Your LLM Truly a Good Chinese Smartphone Assistant? (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation benchmarks for Large Language Models focus on objective tasks like mathematics and coding in English, which do not reflect the practical use cases of on-device LLMs in real-world mobile scenarios.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate the capabilities of on-device Large Language Models in Chinese mobile contexts.
Outcome: The proposed framework evaluates on-device LLMs and MLLMs in Chinese . it provides a standardized framework for evaluating LLM performance on real smartphones .
MobileWorld: Benchmarking Autonomous Mobile Agents in Agent-User Interactive and MCP-Augmented Environments (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: AndroidWorld is the dominant mobile GUI agent evaluation benchmark, but its success rates are low . despite reproducible emulator environment, it lacks key application categories such as e-commerce and enterprise communication.
Approach: They propose a benchmark for mobile GUI agents that reflects real-world usage through long-horizon, cross-application workflows.
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves over 90% success rates, while AndroidWorld is the dominant benchmark.
AgentGym2: Benchmarking Large Language Model Agents in De-Idealized Real-World Environments (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks evaluate agents in simplified, idealized settings, relying on pre-packaged tool interfaces, overlooking critical steps, and assume inputs are clean and fully specified.
Approach: They propose a framework that evaluates language agents in simplified, idealized settings . they show that even SOTA systems like Gemini and GPT-5 struggle on AgentGym2 .
Outcome: Experiments on 15 proprietary and open-source models show that even SOTA systems like Gemini and GPT-5 struggle on AgentGym2 .
TelAgentBench: A Multi-faceted Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Agents in Telecommunications (2025.emnlp-industry)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming powerful agentic systems . generic benchmarks fail to assess realistic, non-English performance .
Approach: They propose to evaluate five core agentic capabilities: Reasoning, Planning, Action (tool-use), Retrieval-Augmented Generation, and Instruction Following.
Outcome: The evaluations reveal significant performance disparities between models that employ explicit reasoning and those that do not.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations