SupChain-Bench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Real-World Supply Chain Management (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models have shown promise in complex reasoning and tool-based decision making, but supply chain workflows require reliable long-horizon, multi-step orchestration grounded in domain-specific procedures. |
| Approach: | They propose a unified real-world benchmark that assesses supply chain domain knowledge and long-horizon tool-based orchestration grounded in standard operating procedures. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves the strongest and consistent tool-calling performance in real-world operational settings. |
Similar Papers
DI-BENCH: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Dependency Inference with Testable Repositories at Scale (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Linghao Zhang, Junhao Wang, Shilin He, Chaoyun Zhang, Yu Kang, Bowen Li, Jiaheng Wen, Chengxing Xie, Maoquan Wang, Yufan Huang, Elsie Nallipogu, Qingwei Lin, Yingnong Dang, Saravan Rajmohan, Dongmei Zhang, Qi Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing studies highlight that dependency-related issues cause over 40% of observed runtime errors on the generated repository. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale benchmark and evaluation framework specifically designed to assess LLMs’ capability on dependency inference. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves only a 48% execution pass rate on Python, indicating room for improvement. |
ACEBench: A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM Tool Usage (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Chen Chen, Xinlong Hao, Weiwen Liu, Xu Huang, Xingshan Zeng, Shuai Yu, Dexun Li, Yuefeng Huang, Xiangcheng Liu, Wang Xinzhi, Wu Liu
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for evaluating LLMs’ tool usage face several limitations: limited evaluation scenarios, lacking assessments in real multi-turn dialogue contexts; narrow evaluation dimensions, with insufficient detailed assessments of how LLM use tools; and reliance on LLM or real API executions for evaluation, which introduces significant overhead. |
| Approach: | ACEBench is a benchmark for evaluating tool usage in Large Language Models . it categorizes data into three primary types based on evaluation methodology: Normal, Special, and Agent. |
| Outcome: | ACEBench categorizes data into three primary types based on evaluation methodology: Normal, Special, and Agent. |
EIFBENCH: Extremely Complex Instruction Following Benchmark for Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focusing on single-task environments with limited constraints lack the complexity required to fully reflect the evolution of large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose to use a Segment Policy Optimization algorithm to enhance the LLM's ability to accurately fulfill multi-task workflows. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that existing benchmarks lack the complexity required to fully reflect the evolution of large language models. |
Market-Bench: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Economic and Trade Competition (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing LLM benchmarks focus on semantic complexity or quantitative competition, but rarely both simultaneously under economic scarcity. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that evaluates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in economically-relevant tasks through economic and trade competition. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model evaluates the capabilities of large language models in economically-relevant tasks through economic and trade competition. |
LLM Evaluate: An Industry-Focused Evaluation Tool for Large Language Models (2025.coling-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capability to solve a wide range of tasks in recent years. |
| Approach: | They propose to build an on-premise system for LLM evaluation to address the challenges in the evaluation of LLMs in real-world industrial settings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation system protects customer privacy and protects data integrity in real-world industrial environments. |
LLM-Powered Benchmark Factory: Reliable, Generic, and Efficient (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Peiwen Yuan, Shaoxiong Feng, Yiwei Li, Xinglin Wang, Yueqi Zhang, Jiayi Shi, Chuyi Tan, Boyuan Pan, Yao Hu, Kan Li
| Challenge: | Using generic and efficient benchmark generators, human annotators are limited by inefficiency . current benchmark generator methods rely on seed signals, leading to long cycles and high costs . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to evaluate LLMs as generic benchmark generators and integrate them as BenchMaker. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves comparable performance to human-annotated benchmarks on most metrics. |
TPTU-v2: Boosting Task Planning and Tool Usage of Large Language Model-based Agents in Real-world Industry Systems (2024.emnlp-industry)
Copied to clipboard
Yilun Kong, Jingqing Ruan, YiHong Chen, Bin Zhang, Tianpeng Bao, Shi Shiwei, Du Qing, Xiaoru Hu, Hangyu Mao, Ziyue Li, Xingyu Zeng, Rui Zhao, Xueqian Wang
| Challenge: | Large language models have demonstrated proficiency in addressing tasks that necessitate a combination of task planning and the usage of external tools. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to enhance the task planning and tool usage abilities of LLMs in industrial systems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework enhances the task planning and tool usage abilities of LLM-based agents in industrial systems. |
LLMRouterBench: A Massive Benchmark and Unified Framework for LLM Routing (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Hao Li, Yiqun Zhang, Zhaoyan Guo, Chenxu Wang, Shengji Tang, Qiaosheng Zhang, Yang Chen, Biqing Qi, Peng Ye, Lei Bai, Zhen Wang, Shuyue Hu
| Challenge: | Large language model (LLM) routing assigns each query to the best suitable model from an ensemble. |
| Approach: | They introduce a large-scale benchmark and unified framework for LLM routing . they find that many routing methods exhibit similar performance under unified evaluation . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark provides comprehensive metrics for both performance-oriented and performance-cost trade-off routing. |
AgentGym2: Benchmarking Large Language Model Agents in De-Idealized Real-World Environments (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Zhiheng Xi, Dingwen Yang, Jiaqi Liu, Jixuan Huang, Honglin Guo, Baodai Huang, Tinggang Chen, Qi Zhang, Zhonghang Lu, Chenyu Liu, Jiajun Sun, Jiazheng Zhang, Dingwei Zhu, Xin Guo, Junzhe Wang, Zhihao Zhang, Yuming Yang, Junjie Ye, Minghe Gao, Dongrui Liu, Jiaming Ji, Guohao Li, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks evaluate agents in simplified, idealized settings, relying on pre-packaged tool interfaces, overlooking critical steps, and assume inputs are clean and fully specified. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that evaluates language agents in simplified, idealized settings . they show that even SOTA systems like Gemini and GPT-5 struggle on AgentGym2 . |
| Outcome: | Experiments on 15 proprietary and open-source models show that even SOTA systems like Gemini and GPT-5 struggle on AgentGym2 . |
Evaluating Large Language Models with Enterprise Benchmarks (2025.naacl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
Bing Zhang, Mikio Takeuchi, Ryo Kawahara, Shubhi Asthana, Maruf Hossain, Guang-Jie Ren, Kate Soule, Yifan Mai, Yada Zhu
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks lack domain-specific datasets for evaluating large language models . existing benchmarks often lack domain specific datasets, which can be difficult to convert to standardized metrics or regulatory issues. |
| Approach: | They propose to use 25 publicly available domain-specific English benchmarks from diverse domains . they propose to combine a wide range of natural language processing tasks for holistic evaluation . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework includes 25 publicly available domain-specific English benchmarks from diverse enterprise domains like financial services, legal, climate, cyber security, and 2 public Japanese finance benchmarks. |