FinLLM-B: When Large Language Models Meet Financial Breakout Trading (2025.naacl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for financial breakout detection are subpar, despite large data and knowledge required. |
| Approach: | They propose a financial breakout dataset and introduce FinLLM-B, a large language model for financial breakout detection. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms GPT-3.5 in the field of financial breakout detection. |
Similar Papers
FinTral: A Family of GPT-4 Level Multimodal Financial Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | FinTral is a suite of state-of-the-art multimodal large language models (LLMs) built upon the Mistral-7b model and tailored for financial analysis. |
| Approach: | They introduce FinTral, a suite of state-of-the-art multimodal large language models built upon the Mistral-7b model and tailored for financial analysis. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms ChatGPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in five out of nine tasks and surpasses GPT-4.5 in five of nine task evaluations. |
Is ChatGPT a Financial Expert? Evaluating Language Models on Financial Natural Language Processing (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized general natural language preprocessing tasks, but their performance in financial domains is not evaluated comprehensively. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to evaluate financial language models on financial tasks . they compare performance of auto-encoding language models and ChatGPT . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework compares the performance of auto-encoding language models and the LLM ChatGPT on financial tasks. |
MultiFinBen: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Multilingual and Multimodal Financial Application (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Xueqing Peng, Lingfei Qian, Yan Wang, Ruoyu Xiang, Yueru He, Yang Ren, Mingyang Jiang, Vincent Jim Zhang, Yuqing Guo, Jeff Zhao, Huan He, Yi Han, Yun Feng, Yuechen Jiang, Yupeng Cao, Haohang Li, Yangyang Yu, Xiaoyu Wang, Penglei Gao, Shengyuan Lin, Keyi Wang, Shanshan Yang, Yilun Zhao, Zhiwei Liu, Peng Lu, Jerry Huang, Suyuchen Wang, Triantafillos Papadopoulos, Polydoros Giannouris, Efstathia Soufleri, Nuo Chen, Zhiyang Deng, Heming Fu, Yijia Zhao, Mingquan Lin, Meikang Qiu, Kaleb E Smith, Arman Cohan, Xiao-Yang Liu, Jimin Huang, Guojun Xiong, Alejandro Lopez-Lira, Xi Chen, Junichi Tsujii, Jian-Yun Nie, Sophia Ananiadou, Qianqian Xie
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations of LLMs in finance are text-only, monolingual, and largely saturated by current models. |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual and multimodal benchmark for evaluating LLMs in real financial contexts. |
| Outcome: | The first expert-annotated multilingual and multimodal benchmark is released . it evaluates 21 leading LLMs and shows they perform better in multilingual settings . |
Are ChatGPT and GPT-4 General-Purpose Solvers for Financial Text Analytics? A Study on Several Typical Tasks (2023.emnlp-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent large language models such as ChatGPT and GPT-4 have shown exceptional capabilities of generalist models . however, their applicability and effectiveness in specific domains like finance needs a better understanding . |
| Approach: | They conduct empirical studies to compare the performance of ChatGPT and GPT-4 on financial text analytical problems using eight benchmark datasets from five categories of tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models outperform the state-of-the-art models on a wide range of financial text analytical tasks. |
FINKRX: Establishing Best Practices for Korean Financial NLP (2025.acl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing tools to evaluate large language models in the financial domain are limited by the inherently closed nature of the financial industry. |
| Approach: | They present the first open leaderboard for evaluating Korean large language models focused on finance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is FINKRX, a fully open and transparent LLM built using these best practices. |
Are Large Language Models Reliable Reviewers? A Benchmark for Error Detection in Financial Documents (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Ying He, Zhouhong Gu, Zhecheng Hu, Yubo Zhou, Hao Shen, Jiaqing Liang, Zhaoqian Dai, Ma Shuguang, Fei Yu, Yanghua Xiao, Zhixu Li
| Challenge: | Existing LLMs struggle to identify errors in financial documents, a study shows . 18% of financial practitioners make errors daily, one-third make errors several times weekly, and 59% make errors multiple times monthly. |
| Approach: | They introduce FinED-Bench, a publicly available Benchmark for financial error detection . it covers nine real-world financial scenarios and includes over 900 documents in 2025 . supervised fine-tuning can significantly improve the performance of weaker LLMs, they show . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark covers nine real-world financial scenarios and includes over 900 documents reported in 2025 that are unseen by existing language models. |
FinMaster: A Holistic Benchmark for Full-Pipeline Financial Management with Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Junzhe Jiang, Chang Yang, Aixin Cui, Sihan Jin, Yujing Zhang, Yilin Xiao, Ruiyu Wang, Bo Li, Xiao Huang, Danny Dongning Sun, Xinrun Wang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks lack domain-specific data, realistic workflow-level task design, and standardized workflow- level evaluation. |
| Approach: | a new benchmark evaluates large language models on financial management workflows . the global financial services market is projected to grow to $37 trillion by 2027 . |
| Outcome: | a new benchmark for large language models on financial management workflows reveals critical capability gaps . accuracy drops from 90% on basic tasks to 40% on complex scenarios requiring multi-step reasoning . the global financial services market reached $25.8 trillion in 2022 and is projected to grow to $37 trillion by 2027 . |
Understanding Structured Financial Data with LLMs: A Case Study on Fraud Detection (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are expensive to develop and maintain and require extensive feature engineering to perform. |
| Approach: | They propose a two-stage approach that serializes a compact subset of numeric/categorical attributes into natural language and performs retrieval-augmented in-context learning over label-aware, instance-level exemplars. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach significantly improves F1/MCC over direct prompting and is competitive with strong tabular baselines in several settings. |
FinMME: Benchmark Dataset for Financial Multi-Modal Reasoning Evaluation (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Junyu Luo, Zhizhuo Kou, Liming Yang, Xiao Luo, Jinsheng Huang, Zhiping Xiao, Jingshu Peng, Chengzhong Liu, Jiaming Ji, Xuanzhe Liu, Sirui Han, Ming Zhang, Yike Guo
| Challenge: | Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have experienced rapid development in recent years, but there is a notable lack of effective and specialized multimodal evaluation datasets in the financial domain. |
| Approach: | They introduce FinMME, a multimodal large language model with 11,000 financial research samples and 20 annotators. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better than state-of-the-art models, highlighting its challenging nature. |
FCMR: Robust Evaluation of Financial Cross-Modal Multi-Hop Reasoning (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for multimodal large language models lack data contamination and complex queries . financial cross-modal multi-hop reasoning is difficult to evaluate and requires precise cross-module reasoning . |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to analyze the reasoning capabilities of multimodal large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is categorized into three difficulty levels—easy, medium, and hard—for step-by-step evaluation. |