| Challenge: | Instruction following is a core capability of Large language models (LLMs), making evaluating this capability essential to understanding these models. |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual instruction following evaluation benchmark that expands to other languages . they propose to use both general and language-specific instructions to evaluate LLMs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark is extended to French, Japanese, and Spanish . it shows that performance across languages and instruction types can vary widely . |
Similar Papers
MaXIFE: Multilingual and Cross-lingual Instruction Following Evaluation (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methods focus on single-language scenarios, overlooking multilingual and cross-lingual contexts. |
| Approach: | They propose a tool to assess instruction-following capabilities across 23 different languages with 1667 verifiable instruction tasks. |
| Outcome: | MaXIFE evaluates instruction-following capabilities across 23 languages with 1667 verifiable instruction tasks. |
P-MMEval: A Parallel Multilingual Multitask Benchmark for Consistent Evaluation of LLMs (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Yidan Zhang, Yu Wan, Boyi Deng, Baosong Yang, Hao-Ran Wei, Fei Huang, Bowen Yu, Dayiheng Liu, Junyang Lin, Fei Huang, Jingren Zhou
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models showcase varied multilingual capabilities across tasks . previous assessments focused on fundamental natural language processing (NLP) or isolated capability-specific tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual multitask benchmark to assess multilingual capabilities . they use a large-scale benchmark covering fundamental and capability-specialized datasets . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark compares models and tasks across languages and tasks and examines knowledge transfer from English to other languages. |
Marco-Bench-MIF: On Multilingual Instruction-Following Capability of Large Language (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Bo Zeng, Chenyang Lyu, Sinuo Liu, Mingyan Zeng, Minghao Wu, Xuanfan Ni, Tianqi Shi, Yu Zhao, Yefeng Liu, Chenyu Zhu, Ruizhe Li, Jiahui Geng, Qing Li, Yu Tong, Longyue Wang, Weihua Luo, Kaifu Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing datasets for instruction-following are monolingual and centered on English . existing data are unable to capture linguistic and cultural subtle differences . |
| Approach: | They propose an extension of IFEval to a localized multilingual version called Marco-Bench-MIF . their benchmark addresses linguistic constraints and cultural references via translation and verification . |
| Outcome: | The proposed extension of IFEval to a localized multilingual version covers 30 languages with varying levels of localization. |
Multi-lingual Functional Evaluation for Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multilingual competence in large language models is often evaluated via static data benchmarks such as Belebele, M-MMLU and M-GSM. |
| Approach: | They extend existing functional benchmark templates from English to five additional languages that span the range of resources available for NLP: French, Spanish, Hindi, Arabic and Yoruba. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models are translated from English to French, Spanish, Hindi, Arabic and Yoruba. |
BenchMAX: A Comprehensive Multilingual Evaluation Suite for Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing multilingual benchmarks focus primarily on language understanding tasks. |
| Approach: | They develop a multi-way multilingual benchmark that measures critical capabilities of large language models across languages. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on BenchMAX reveal uneven utilization of core capabilities across languages, emphasizing the performance gaps that scaling model size alone does not resolve. |
GlotEval: A Test Suite for Massively Multilingual Evaluation of Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-demos)
Copied to clipboard
Hengyu Luo, Zihao Li, Joseph Attieh, Sawal Devkota, Ona de Gibert, Xu Huang, Shaoxiong Ji, Peiqin Lin, Bhavani Sai Praneeth Varma Mantina, Ananda Sreenidhi, Raúl Vázquez, Mengjie Wang, Samea Yusofi, Fei Yuan, Jörg Tiedemann
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation frameworks focus on English and a handful of high-resource languages, thereby overlooking the realistic performance of large language models in multilingual and lower-resourced scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a unified and lightweight framework that integrates 27 benchmarks under a standard ISO 639-3 language identifier system to enable seamless incorporation of new benchmarks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework integrates 27 benchmarks under a standard ISO 639-3 language identifier system, allowing for seamless incorporation of new benchmarks. |
Empowering Reliable Visual-Centric Instruction Following in MLLMs (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for evaluating instruction-following capabilities focus on verbal instructions in the textual modality. |
| Approach: | They propose to incorporate vision-dependent constraints into instruction design to enable a more rigorous assessment of how well MLLMs align their outputs with both visual input and textual instructions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark incorporates vision-dependent constraints into instruction design, enabling a more rigorous and fine-grained assessment of how well MLLMs align their outputs with both visual input and textual instructions. |
MMLU-ProX: A Multilingual Benchmark for Advanced Large Language Model Evaluation (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Weihao Xuan, Rui Yang, Heli Qi, Qingcheng Zeng, Yunze Xiao, Aosong Feng, Dairui Liu, Yun Xing, Junjue Wang, Fan Gao, Jinghui Lu, Yuang Jiang, Huitao Li, Xin Li, Kunyu Yu, Ruihai Dong, Shangding Gu, Yuekang Li, Xiaofei Xie, Felix Juefei-Xu, Foutse Khomh, Osamu Yoshie, Qingyu Chen, Douglas Teodoro, Nan Liu, Randy Goebel, Lei Ma, Edison Marrese-Taylor, Shijian Lu, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka Matsuo, Irene Li
| Challenge: | Existing large language model evaluation benchmarks focus on English, while current multilingual tasks lack parallel questions that specifically assess cross-lingual reasoning abilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a comprehensive benchmark covering 29 languages, built on an English benchmark. |
| Outcome: | The MMLU-ProX is a comprehensive benchmark covering 29 languages, built on an English benchmark. |
ReIFE: Re-evaluating Instruction-Following Evaluation (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yixin Liu, Kejian Shi, Alexander Fabbri, Yilun Zhao, PeiFeng Wang, Chien-Sheng Wu, Shafiq Joty, Arman Cohan
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations of large language models (LLMs) for instruction following are incomplete. |
| Approach: | They propose to use 25 base LLMs and 15 recently proposed evaluation protocols to evaluate instruction following on 4 human-annotated datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluations identify the best-performing base LLMs and evaluation protocols with a high degree of robustness. |
The SIFo Benchmark: Investigating the Sequential Instruction Following Ability of Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Xinyi Chen, Baohao Liao, Jirui Qi, Panagiotis Eustratiadis, Christof Monz, Arianna Bisazza, Maarten Rijke
| Challenge: | Current evaluation resources for instruction following focus on single task instructions, but the instruction sequences in these benchmarks often lack coherence. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate models’ abilities to follow multiple instructions through sequential instruction following tasks using four tasks to assess different aspects of sequential instruction followed. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark outperforms open-source and closed-source models on four tasks assessing different aspects of sequential instruction following. |