The SIFo Benchmark: Investigating the Sequential Instruction Following Ability of Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Xinyi Chen, Baohao Liao, Jirui Qi, Panagiotis Eustratiadis, Christof Monz, Arianna Bisazza, Maarten Rijke
| Challenge: | Current evaluation resources for instruction following focus on single task instructions, but the instruction sequences in these benchmarks often lack coherence. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate models’ abilities to follow multiple instructions through sequential instruction following tasks using four tasks to assess different aspects of sequential instruction followed. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark outperforms open-source and closed-source models on four tasks assessing different aspects of sequential instruction following. |
Similar Papers
When Instructions Multiply: Measuring and Estimating LLM Capabilities of Multiple Instructions Following (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Keno Harada, Yudai Yamazaki, Masachika Taniguchi, Edison Marrese-Taylor, Takeshi Kojima, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka Matsuo
| Challenge: | a large number of languages are increasingly used to evaluate their ability to follow multiple instructions simultaneously. |
| Approach: | They propose two benchmarks to evaluate LLMs' ability to follow multiple instructions simultaneously . they use many instruction-following eval and style-aware Mostly Basic programming problems . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models predict performance on unseen instruction combinations and not used during training with 10% error. |
CodeIF: Benchmarking the Instruction-Following Capabilities of Large Language Models for Code Generation (2025.acl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | CodeIF assesses the ability of large language models to adhere to task-oriented instructions in code generation tasks. |
| Approach: | They introduce a benchmark designed to assess LLMs' ability to adhere to task-oriented instructions within diverse code generation scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark assesses LLMs' ability to adhere to task-oriented instructions in code generation tasks across a wide range of complexity levels and programming domains. |
Evaluating the Instruction-Following Robustness of Large Language Models to Prompt Injection (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional proficiency in instruction-following, making them increasingly integral to various applications. |
| Approach: | They establish a benchmark to evaluate the robustness of instruction-following LLMs against prompt injection attacks, assessing their ability to discern which instructions to follow and which to disregard. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is overly sensitive to prompt injection attacks, focusing on the latter part of the prompt without fully understanding the context. |
InFoBench: Evaluating Instruction Following Ability in Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yiwei Qin, Kaiqiang Song, Yebowen Hu, Wenlin Yao, Sangwoo Cho, Xiaoyang Wang, Xuansheng Wu, Fei Liu, Pengfei Liu, Dong Yu
| Challenge: | Existing methods for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) ability to follow instructions have not been able to provide a detailed analysis of their compliance with instructions. |
| Approach: | They propose a new metric for evaluating Large Language Models' ability to follow instructions and a benchmark for DRFR. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric and benchmark compared with traditional scoring methods and explores annotation sources including human experts, crowd-sourced workers, and GPT-4. |
From Complex to Simple: Enhancing Multi-Constraint Complex Instruction Following Ability of Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) follow instructions with elaborate requirements, yet it remains under-explored how to enhance their ability to follow complex instructions with multiple constraints. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to obtain and utilize effective training data to enhance LLMs' ability to follow complex instructions with multiple constraints. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves models' ability to follow instructions generally and generalize effectively across out-of-domain, in domain, and adversarial settings while maintaining general capabilities. |
ReIFE: Re-evaluating Instruction-Following Evaluation (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yixin Liu, Kejian Shi, Alexander Fabbri, Yilun Zhao, PeiFeng Wang, Chien-Sheng Wu, Shafiq Joty, Arman Cohan
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations of large language models (LLMs) for instruction following are incomplete. |
| Approach: | They propose to use 25 base LLMs and 15 recently proposed evaluation protocols to evaluate instruction following on 4 human-annotated datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluations identify the best-performing base LLMs and evaluation protocols with a high degree of robustness. |
Multi-Task Inference: Can Large Language Models Follow Multiple Instructions at Once? (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are typically trained to follow a single instruction per inference call. |
| Approach: | They introduce a benchmark to evaluate Large language models' ability to follow one instruction per inference call. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model reduces the total inference time by 1.46 times in average since it does not require multiple inference calls. |
MaXIFE: Multilingual and Cross-lingual Instruction Following Evaluation (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methods focus on single-language scenarios, overlooking multilingual and cross-lingual contexts. |
| Approach: | They propose a tool to assess instruction-following capabilities across 23 different languages with 1667 verifiable instruction tasks. |
| Outcome: | MaXIFE evaluates instruction-following capabilities across 23 languages with 1667 verifiable instruction tasks. |
Fine-Tuning Large Language Models with Sequential Instructions (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing instruction-tuned models struggle to adhere to a query with multiple intentions, which impairs their performance when the completion of several tasks is demanded by a single command. |
| Approach: | They develop an automatic process that turns existing data into diverse and complex task chains and a new benchmark to evaluate a model’s ability to follow all the instructions in a sequence. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can follow instructions better and deliver higher results in coding, maths, and open-ended generation. |
CIF-Bench: A Chinese Instruction-Following Benchmark for Evaluating the Generalizability of Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yizhi Li, Ge Zhang, Xingwei Qu, Jiali Li, Zhaoqun Li, Noah Wang, Hao Li, Ruibin Yuan, Yinghao Ma, Kai Zhang, Wangchunshu Zhou, Yiming Liang, Lei Zhang, Lei Ma, Jiajun Zhang, Zuowen Li, Wenhao Huang, Chenghua Lin, Jie Fu
| Challenge: | a recent study shows that large language models have limited generalization in low-resource languages like Chinese. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate the zero-shot generalizability of large language models to the Chinese language . they release only half of the dataset publicly, with the remainder kept private . |
| Outcome: | The Chinese Instruction-Following Benchmark evaluates the generalizability of LLMs to the Chinese language. |