RoTBench: A Multi-Level Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models in Tool Learning (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Junjie Ye, Yilong Wu, Songyang Gao, Caishuang Huang, Sixian Li, Guanyu Li, Xiaoran Fan, Qi Zhang, Tao Gui, Xuanjing Huang
| Challenge: | Current research emphasizes LLMs’ capacity to utilize tools in well-structured environments while overlooking their stability when confronted with the inevitable noise of the real world. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-level benchmark to evaluate the robustness of large language models in tool learning by establishing five external environments with varying levels of noise. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the GPT-4 model in tool learning in three critical phases: tool selection, parameter identification, and content filling. |
Similar Papers
StableToolBench: Towards Stable Large-Scale Benchmarking on Tool Learning of Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Zhicheng Guo, Sijie Cheng, Hao Wang, Shihao Liang, Yujia Qin, Peng Li, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, Yang Liu
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have witnessed remarkable advancements in recent years, prompting the exploration of tool learning. |
| Approach: | They propose a virtual API server and stable evaluation system to assess the stability of large-scale real-time APIs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks demonstrate the stability of the proposed system and its caching system. |
ACEBench: A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM Tool Usage (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Chen Chen, Xinlong Hao, Weiwen Liu, Xu Huang, Xingshan Zeng, Shuai Yu, Dexun Li, Yuefeng Huang, Xiangcheng Liu, Wang Xinzhi, Wu Liu
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for evaluating LLMs’ tool usage face several limitations: limited evaluation scenarios, lacking assessments in real multi-turn dialogue contexts; narrow evaluation dimensions, with insufficient detailed assessments of how LLM use tools; and reliance on LLM or real API executions for evaluation, which introduces significant overhead. |
| Approach: | ACEBench is a benchmark for evaluating tool usage in Large Language Models . it categorizes data into three primary types based on evaluation methodology: Normal, Special, and Agent. |
| Outcome: | ACEBench categorizes data into three primary types based on evaluation methodology: Normal, Special, and Agent. |
MuBench: Assessment of Multilingual Capabilities of Large Language Models Across 61 Languages (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation datasets lack cross-lingual alignment, leaving assessments of multilingual capabilities fragmented in both language and skill coverage. |
| Approach: | They propose to use multilingual consistency as a complementary metric to assess performance bottlenecks and guide model improvement. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model lacks cross-lingual alignment and language coverage gaps between state-of-the-art models. |
LaoBench: A Large-Scale Multidimensional Lao Benchmark for Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Jian Gao, Richeng Xuan, Zhaolu Kang, Dingshi Liao, Wenxin Huang, Zongmou Huang, Yangdi Xu, Bowen Qin, Zheqi He, Xi Yang, null Changjinli, Yonghua Lin
| Challenge: | Existing SEA-focused benchmarks miss Lao-specific cultural grounding and linguistic properties. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-dimensional benchmark for assessing large language models in Lao . they use open-source and held-out subsets to evaluate languages with a hybrid pipeline . |
| Outcome: | LaoBench is the first large-scale, high-quality, and multidimensional benchmark for assessing LLM language understanding and reasoning in Lao. |
SafeToolBench: Pioneering a Prospective Benchmark to Evaluating Tool Utilization Safety in LLMs (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches fail to fully capture all risks in tool utilization, resulting in financial loss or privacy leaking. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to assess the safety of LLM tool utilization in a prospective manner, covering malicious user instructions and diverse practical toolsets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework significantly enhances LLMs’ self-awareness, enabling a more safer and trustworthy tool utilization. |
ToolHaystack: Stress-Testing Tool-Augmented Language Models in Realistic Long-Term Interactions (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Beong-woo Kwak, Minju Kim, Dongha Lim, Hyungjoo Chae, Dongjin Kang, Sunghwan Kim, Dongil Yang, Jinyoung Yeo
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations assume tool use in short contexts, offering limited insight into model behavior during realistic long-term interactions. |
| Approach: | a benchmark is a tool to test long-term tool use in large language models . the tool includes multiple tasks execution contexts and realistic noise . |
| Outcome: | a new benchmark tests the tool use capabilities in long-term interactions. |
UniToolBench: A Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMs in Cross-Domain, Universal Task Automation (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks that focus on manually curated tool graphs lack scalability and diversity across domains. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale, cross-domain benchmark to evaluate LLMs' ability to reason over and utilize interconnected tools for automation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark incorporates automated tool graph construction by formulating link prediction as a probabilistic task, instead of relying on categorical LLM outputs. |
SafeLawBench: Towards Safe Alignment of Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Chuxue Cao, Han Zhu, Jiaming Ji, Qichao Sun, Zhenghao Zhu, Wu Yinyu, Josef Dai, Yaodong Yang, Sirui Han, Yike Guo
| Challenge: | Recent studies indicate that large language models (LLMs) may exhibit risks, including threats to the protection of private data and the generation of hallucinations. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate LLMs from a legal perspective using the SafeLawBench benchmark. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework categorizes safety risks into three levels based on legal standards and includes 24,860 multi-choice questions and 1,106 open-domain question-answering tasks. |
VoiceBench: Benchmarking LLM-Based Voice Assistants (2026.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled real-time speech interactions through LLMs. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark specifically designed to assess LLM-based voice assistants. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark measures the performance of LLM-based voice assistants across eight tasks. |
TRUEBench: Can LLM Response Meet Real-world Constraints as Productivity Assistant? (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks fail to evaluate large language models' instruction-following capabilities . current benchmarks lack multilinguality, implicit constraints and multi-turn dialogue . |
| Approach: | a new benchmark is designed to evaluate large language models' instruction-following capabilities . the benchmark features input prompts across 12 languages and includes inter-instance multilingual instructions . |
| Outcome: | a new benchmark for large language models (LLMs) is designed to assess their performance in real-world settings. |