ToolSpectrum: Towards Personalized Tool Utilization for Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches focus on functional tool selection following user instructions while overlooking the critical role of context-aware personalization in tool selection. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate LLMs’ capabilities in personalized tool utilization. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates LLMs' capabilities in personalized tool utilization. |
Similar Papers
PEToolLLM: Towards Personalized Tool Learning in Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing tool learning studies focus on general-purpose tool-use capability, but ignore the importance of personalized tool-user preferences. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to adapt Large Language Models to personalized tool learning task, which is trained through supervised fine-tuning and direct preference optimization. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on PEToolBench show that the proposed framework outperforms existing LLMs in the personalized tool learning task. |
Evaluating Personalized Tool-Augmented LLMs from the Perspectives of Personalization and Proactivity (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Personalized tool utilization is essential for aligning large language models (LLMs) with user preference in interaction scenarios with various tools. |
| Approach: | They propose a key-point-based LLM evaluation method that mitigates biases by manually annotating key points for each test case and providing them to LLM as the reference. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method mitigates biases in the LLM-as-a-judge system by manually annotating key points for each test case and providing them to LLM as the reference. |
ToolScope: Enhancing LLM Agent Tool Use through Tool Merging and Context-Aware Filtering (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language model (LLM) agents often face strict input context limits, preventing efficient consideration of large toolsets. |
| Approach: | They propose a tool that allows LLMs to merge tools with auto-correction and toolScopeRetriever to rank and select only the most relevant tools for each query. |
| Outcome: | Evaluations on three state-of-the-art LLMs and three open-source tool-use benchmarks show gains of 8.38% to 38.6% in tool selection accuracy. |
TAPS: Tool-Augmented Personalisation via Structured Tagging (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to personalise tool use overlook the role of personalisation in guiding tool use. |
| Approach: | They propose a tool-augmented large language model that integrates user preferences into goal-oriented dialogue agents by leveraging a structured tagging tool and an uncertainty-based tool detector. |
| Outcome: | The proposed solution significantly improves the ability of LLMs to incorporate user preferences, achieving the new state-of-the-art for open source models on the NLSI task. |
Exploring Safety-Utility Trade-Offs in Personalized Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prior studies have shown that large language models can exhibit bias against specific demographic groups and engage in the generation of stereotypical responses. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to evaluate LLM performance along two axes: safety and utility. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates the performance of LLMs along two axes: safety and utility. |
Adaptive Tool Use in Large Language Models with Meta-Cognition Trigger (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Wenjun Li, Dexun Li, Kuicai Dong, Cong Zhang, Hao Zhang, Weiwen Liu, Yasheng Wang, Ruiming Tang, Yong Liu
| Challenge: | Existing research expands the tool arrays of large language models (LLMs), but the necessity of using these tools is often overlooked, leading to indiscriminate tool invocation. |
| Approach: | They propose a meta-cognition proxy proxy for LLMs self-assessment of their capabilities, reflecting the model’s awareness of its own limitations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed strategy is fine-tuned-free and costs minimal. |
SMARTCAL: An Approach to Self-Aware Tool-Use Evaluation and Calibration (2024.emnlp-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have a profound impact on a wide range of applications. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to mitigate the tool-abuse behavior of Large Language Models and propose SMARTCAL to mitigate this issue. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves the performance of LLMs on three datasets with two mainstream tool-use frameworks and shows an 8.6% increase in QA performance and 21.6 percent lower expected calibration error (ECE) than existing methods. |
LLMs + Persona-Plug = Personalized LLMs (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Jiongnan Liu, Yutao Zhu, Shuting Wang, Xiaochi Wei, Erxue Min, Yu Lu, Shuaiqiang Wang, Dawei Yin, Zhicheng Dou
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated extraordinary capabilities in natural language understanding, generation, and reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a plug-and-play LLM model that embeds a user-specific embedding for each individual by modeling her historical contexts through a lightweight plug-in user embedder module. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on various tasks in the language model personalization (LaMP) benchmark show that the proposed model significantly outperforms existing personalized LLM approaches. |
Tool Preferences in Agentic LLMs are Unreliable (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Kazem Faghih, Wenxiao Wang, Yize Cheng, Siddhant Bharti, Gaurang Sriramanan, Sriram Balasubramanian, Parsa Hosseini, Soheil Feizi
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) can now access a wide range of external tools thanks to the Model Context Protocol (MCP). |
| Approach: | They expose a vulnerability in prevalent tool/function-calling protocols by editing tool descriptions to find out which tools are used by LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed changes in the tool descriptions can increase the usage of tools from LLMs when competing with alternatives. |
ToolHaystack: Stress-Testing Tool-Augmented Language Models in Realistic Long-Term Interactions (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Beong-woo Kwak, Minju Kim, Dongha Lim, Hyungjoo Chae, Dongjin Kang, Sunghwan Kim, Dongil Yang, Jinyoung Yeo
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations assume tool use in short contexts, offering limited insight into model behavior during realistic long-term interactions. |
| Approach: | a benchmark is a tool to test long-term tool use in large language models . the tool includes multiple tasks execution contexts and realistic noise . |
| Outcome: | a new benchmark tests the tool use capabilities in long-term interactions. |