MC-MKE: A Fine-Grained Multimodal Knowledge Editing Benchmark Emphasizing Modality Consistency (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for knowledge editing in multimodal large language models focus on limited scenarios due to the lack of rigorous definition of multimodal knowledge. |
| Approach: | They propose a decomposed definition of multimodal knowledge and a benchmark to evaluate it. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reveals that it is difficult to define multimodal knowledge editing in LLMs. |
Similar Papers
M2Edit: Locate and Edit Multi-Granularity Knowledge in Multimodal Large Language Model (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge editing methods for MLLMs lack multi-granularity knowledge . existing knowledge editing approaches lack multimodality knowledge and generalize to multimodal data. |
| Approach: | They propose a multimodal knowledge editing method which integrates key knowledge layers within MLLMs and collaboratively edits them. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves visual generality performance on knowledge data of different granularities. |
MIKE: A New Benchmark for Fine-grained Multimodal Entity Knowledge Editing (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Jiaqi Li, Miaozeng Du, Chuanyi Zhang, Yongrui Chen, Nan Hu, Guilin Qi, Haiyun Jiang, Siyuan Cheng, Bozhong Tian
| Challenge: | Current benchmarks focus on coarse-grained knowledge, leaving the intricacies of fine-grounded knowledge unexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark and dataset specifically designed for FG multimodal entity knowledge editing. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark underscoring the complexity of FG knowledge editing in MLLMs. |
Can We Edit Multimodal Large Language Models? (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to edit multimodal models have been used to incrementally infuse a language model with a new set of facts. |
| Approach: | They construct a benchmark for editing multimodal Large Language Models and establish metrics for evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that editing multimodal models is not as difficult as editing single-modal models. |
Exploring and Evaluating Multimodal Knowledge Reasoning Consistency of Multimodal Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | MLLMs have achieved significant breakthroughs in understanding across text and vision, but current models still face inconsistencies in reasoning outcomes. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate multimodal large language models using a multimodal knowledge reasoning dataset to examine the extent of consistency degradation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation tasks show that MLLMs are inefficient at integrating knowledge across modalities . |
Editing Across Languages: A Survey of Multilingual Knowledge Editing (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Knowledge Editing is a growing subdomain of model editing focused on ensuring factual edits generalize across languages. |
| Approach: | They present a taxonomy of multilingual knowledge editing methods and benchmarks . authors summarize key findings on method effectiveness and transfer patterns . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods are compared against available benchmarks and benchmark datasets. |
MLLM-Bench: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs with Per-sample Criteria (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Wentao Ge, Shunian Chen, Hardy Chen, Nuo Chen, Junying Chen, Zhihong Chen, Wenya Xie, Shuo Yan, ChenghaoZhu ChenghaoZhu, Ziyue Lin, Dingjie Song, Xidong Wang, Anningzhe Gao, Zhang Zhiyi, Jianquan Li, Xiang Wan, Benyou Wang
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methodologies for multimodal large language models are limited in evaluating objective queries without considering real-world user experiences. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate multimodal large language models with per-sample criteria using potent MLLM as the judge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation paradigm shows that it can be used to evaluate multimodal large language models with per-sample criteria. |
MCiteBench: A Multimodal Benchmark for Generating Text with Citations (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work focuses on generating citations for text-only content . experimental results reveal MLLMs struggle to ground outputs reliably when handling multimodal input . |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess the ability of MLLMs to generate text with citations in multimodal contexts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark assesses the ability of MLLMs to generate text with citations in multimodal contexts. |
Unveiling Multimodal Processing: Exploring Activation Patterns in Multimodal LLMs for Interpretability and Efficiency (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in multimodal large language models have remained opaque. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to convert dense MLLMs into fine-grained Mixture-of-Experts architectures. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms random expert pruning and sparse activation and model pruning. |
Multimodal Inconsistency Reasoning (MMIR): A New Benchmark for Multimodal Reasoning Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are predominantly trained on consistent visual-textual inputs, leaving open the question of whether they can handle semantic mismatches in layout-rich content. |
| Approach: | They propose to use multimodal inconsistency reasoning to assess MLLMs' ability to reason about semantic mismatches in webpages, presentation slides, and posters. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms open-source models in detecting inconsistencies in webpages, presentation slides, and posters while remaining vulnerable to inconsistent errors. |
MM-LLMs: Recent Advances in MultiModal Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | MultiModal Large Language Models (MM-LLMs) have undergone significant advances in the past year . traditional MM models incur substantial computational costs, especially when trained from scratch . |
| Approach: | They propose a taxonomy encompassing 126 MM-LLMs and summarize key training recipes to enhance their potency. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models preserve the reasoning and decision-making capabilities of LLMs and empower diverse range of MM tasks. |