Papers by Hardy Chen
PATIENT-π: Using Large Language Models to Simulate Patients for Training Mental Health Professionals (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Ruiyi Wang, Stephanie Milani, Jamie Chiu, Jiayin Zhi, Shaun Eack, Travis Labrum, Samuel Murphy, Nev Jones, Kate Hardy, Hong Shen, Fei Fang, Zhiyu Chen
| Challenge: | Mental illness remains one of the most critical public health issues. |
| Approach: | They propose a patient simulation framework for cognitive behavior therapy training that uses large language models to act as a simulated therapy patient. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves the skill acquisition and confidence of mental health trainees beyond textbooks, videos, and role-play with non-patients. |
MLLM-Bench: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs with Per-sample Criteria (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Wentao Ge, Shunian Chen, Hardy Chen, Nuo Chen, Junying Chen, Zhihong Chen, Wenya Xie, Shuo Yan, ChenghaoZhu ChenghaoZhu, Ziyue Lin, Dingjie Song, Xidong Wang, Anningzhe Gao, Zhang Zhiyi, Jianquan Li, Xiang Wan, Benyou Wang
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methodologies for multimodal large language models are limited in evaluating objective queries without considering real-world user experiences. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate multimodal large language models with per-sample criteria using potent MLLM as the judge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation paradigm shows that it can be used to evaluate multimodal large language models with per-sample criteria. |
Reasoning While Asking: Transforming Reasoning Large Language Models from Passive Solvers to Proactive Inquirers (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing reasoning-oriented LLMs lack a blind self-thinking paradigm . current models fail to recognize when their reasoning is underinformed or based on ambiguous user instructions . |
| Approach: | They propose a new reasoning paradigm that transforms LLMs into proactive inquirers that interleave reasoning with clarification. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baseline models on mathematical reasoning, code generation, and document editing. |
ViLBench: A Suite for Vision-Language Process Reward Modeling (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Despite its advantages, evaluation on PRMs remains less explored, especially in the multimodal domain. |
| Approach: | They propose to benchmark vision large language models as output reward models and process reward models as process-supervised reward models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms both ORM and PRM on vision-language benchmarks and achieves an average improvement of 3.3% over standard CoT and up to 2.5% over its untrained counterpart on ViLBench. |