Papers by Wenya Xie
Word Salad Chopper: Reasoning Models Waste A Ton Of Decoding Budget On Useless Repetitions, Self-Knowingly (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) are often bottlenecked by the high cost of output tokens. |
| Approach: | They propose a lightweight, turnkey component for Large Reasoning Models that is minimally invasive to its reasoning trajectory. |
| Outcome: | The proposed component is lightweight and low overhead, and lacks semantic value. |
Unlocking LLMs’ Self-Improvement Capacity with Autonomous Learning for Domain Adaptation (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models that use self-supervised and instruction fine-tuning can be trained using unlabeled corpora. |
| Approach: | They propose to use unlabeled target corpora to adapt large language models to new domains . they propose to employ self-supervised pre-training and instruction fine-tuning methods . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can adapt to new domains using only a large amount of unlabeled target corpora. |
Knowledge Boundary of Large Language Models: A Survey (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) store vast amount of knowledge in their parameters, but they still have limitations in the memorization and utilization of certain knowledge. |
| Approach: | They propose a comprehensive definition of the LLM knowledge boundary and introduce a formalized taxonomy categorizing knowledge into four distinct types. |
| Outcome: | The proposed definition of the LLM knowledge boundary and taxonomy categorizes knowledge into four distinct types . aims to offer a comprehensive overview, facilitate access to key issues, and inspire further advancements in LLM research. |
How Memory Management Impacts LLM Agents: An Empirical Study of Experience-Following Behavior (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Zidi Xiong, Yuping Lin, Wenya Xie, Pengfei He, Zirui Liu, Jiliang Tang, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Zhen Xiang
| Challenge: | In practice, memory designs vary widely across agents due to their diverse objectives and functionalities. |
| Approach: | They conduct an empirical study on how memory management choices impact the LLM agents’ behavior, especially their long-term performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods show that LLM agents display an experience-following property, which results in highly similar agent outputs. |
MLLM-Bench: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs with Per-sample Criteria (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Wentao Ge, Shunian Chen, Hardy Chen, Nuo Chen, Junying Chen, Zhihong Chen, Wenya Xie, Shuo Yan, ChenghaoZhu ChenghaoZhu, Ziyue Lin, Dingjie Song, Xidong Wang, Anningzhe Gao, Zhang Zhiyi, Jianquan Li, Xiang Wan, Benyou Wang
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methodologies for multimodal large language models are limited in evaluating objective queries without considering real-world user experiences. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate multimodal large language models with per-sample criteria using potent MLLM as the judge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation paradigm shows that it can be used to evaluate multimodal large language models with per-sample criteria. |
Reasoning While Asking: Transforming Reasoning Large Language Models from Passive Solvers to Proactive Inquirers (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing reasoning-oriented LLMs lack a blind self-thinking paradigm . current models fail to recognize when their reasoning is underinformed or based on ambiguous user instructions . |
| Approach: | They propose a new reasoning paradigm that transforms LLMs into proactive inquirers that interleave reasoning with clarification. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baseline models on mathematical reasoning, code generation, and document editing. |