Papers by Qianqi Yan
Muffin or Chihuahua? Challenging Multimodal Large Language Models with Multipanel VQA (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yue Fan, Jing Gu, Kaiwen Zhou, Qianqi Yan, Shan Jiang, Ching-Chen Kuo, Yang Zhao, Xinze Guan, Xin Wang
| Challenge: | Multipanel images are a common form of visual representations, and humans can achieve approximately 99% accuracy on these questions. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that tests multipanel visual reasoning models with 6,600 triplets of questions, answers, and multipanel images. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark features 6,600 triplets of questions, answers, and multipanel images that challenge state-of-the-art Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) human users can attain approximately 99% accuracy on these questions, compared with previous benchmarks. |
Worse than Random? An Embarrassingly Simple Probing Evaluation of Large Multimodal Models in Medical VQA (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have demonstrated impressive performance on existing medical visual question answering benchmarks. |
| Approach: | They evaluate large multimodal models that perform worse than random guessing on medical questions . authors suggest more robust evaluation methods to ensure reliability of LMMs . |
| Outcome: | a new study shows that large multimodal models perform worse than random guessing on medical visual question answering benchmarks. |
Hidden in Plain Sight: Reasoning in Underspecified and Misspecified Scenarios for Multimodal LLMs (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models are increasingly deployed in open-ended, real-world environments where inputs are messy, underspecified, and not always trustworthy. |
| Approach: | They evaluate multimodal large language models in real-world environments where inputs are messy, underspecified, and not always trustworthy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models fail to detect hidden issues even when they possess the necessary perceptual and reasoning skills. |
Multimodal Inconsistency Reasoning (MMIR): A New Benchmark for Multimodal Reasoning Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are predominantly trained on consistent visual-textual inputs, leaving open the question of whether they can handle semantic mismatches in layout-rich content. |
| Approach: | They propose to use multimodal inconsistency reasoning to assess MLLMs' ability to reason about semantic mismatches in webpages, presentation slides, and posters. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms open-source models in detecting inconsistencies in webpages, presentation slides, and posters while remaining vulnerable to inconsistent errors. |