DnA-Eval: Enhancing Large Language Model Evaluation through Decomposition and Aggregation (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are scalable and economical evaluators, but how reliable they are is still under-explored. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework which breaks down the evaluation process into decomposition and aggregation stages based on pedagogical practices and provides an interpretable window for how well LLMs evaluate . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves performance on a variety of meta-evaluation benchmarks by providing an interpretable window for how well LLMs evaluate . |
Similar Papers
HD-Eval: Aligning Large Language Model Evaluators Through Hierarchical Criteria Decomposition (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yuxuan Liu, Tianchi Yang, Shaohan Huang, Zihan Zhang, Haizhen Huang, Furu Wei, Weiwei Deng, Feng Sun, Qi Zhang
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are a promising alternative to expensive human evaluations. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that iteratively aligns LLM-based evaluators with human preference . they decompose a given evaluation task into finer-grained criteria . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework iteratively aligns LLM-based evaluators with human preference . it decomposes a given evaluation task into finer-grained criteria . the framework is efficient to train and more explainable than relying solely on prompts . |
Co-Eval: Augmenting LLM-based Evaluation with Machine Metrics (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing LLMs suffer from biases and misalignment due to limited functional understanding and knowledge gaps. |
| Approach: | They introduce a framework that leverages a criteria planner model and optimized machine metrics to enhance the scalability and fairness of LLM-based evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework reduces biases and improves alignment with human preferences, with gains of up to 0.324 in Spearman correlation. |
Leveraging Large Language Models for NLG Evaluation: Advances and Challenges (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | introducing Large Language Models (LLMs) has opened new avenues for assessing generated content quality, e.g., coherence, creativity, and context relevance. |
| Approach: | They propose a taxonomy for organizing existing LLM-based evaluation metrics and a structured framework to understand and compare them. |
| Outcome: | The proposed taxonomy offers a framework to understand and compare LLM-based evaluation methods. |
Learning to Judge: LLMs Designing and Applying Evaluation Rubrics (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models are increasingly used as evaluators for natural language generation . human rubrics are often static and misaligned with how models internally represent language quality. |
| Approach: | They propose to use large language models to generate interpretable and task-aware evaluation dimensions and apply them within models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves the semantic coherence and scoring reliability of LLM-defined criteria and their alignment with human criteria. |
LLM Evaluate: An Industry-Focused Evaluation Tool for Large Language Models (2025.coling-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capability to solve a wide range of tasks in recent years. |
| Approach: | They propose to build an on-premise system for LLM evaluation to address the challenges in the evaluation of LLMs in real-world industrial settings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation system protects customer privacy and protects data integrity in real-world industrial environments. |
A Systematic Survey and Critical Review on Evaluating Large Language Models: Challenges, Limitations, and Recommendations (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Sawsan Alqahtani, M Saiful Bari, Mizanur Rahman, Mohammad Abdullah Matin Khan, Haidar Khan, Israt Jahan, Amran Bhuiyan, Chee Wei Tan, Md Rizwan Parvez, Enamul Hoque, Shafiq Joty, Jimmy Huang
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained significant attention due to their capabilities in performing diverse tasks across domains. |
| Approach: | They review the primary challenges and limitations causing inconsistencies in evaluations . early models could generate coherent text but limited to simple tasks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluations are reproducible, reliable, and robust. |
EpiK-Eval: Evaluation for Language Models as Epistemic Models (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Developing systems that can reason through language understanding has been a cornerstone in natural language processing research. |
| Approach: | They propose a question-answering benchmark to evaluate LLMs' ability to combine knowledge from different training documents within their parameter space. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark aims to evaluate LLMs' ability to combine knowledge from different training documents within their parameter space. |
Are Large Language Model-based Evaluators the Solution to Scaling Up Multilingual Evaluation? (2024.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
Rishav Hada, Varun Gumma, Adrian Wynter, Harshita Diddee, Mohamed Ahmed, Monojit Choudhury, Kalika Bali, Sunayana Sitaram
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in various tasks, but their evaluation, especially in languages beyond the top 20, remains inadequate due to existing benchmarks and metrics limitations. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Large Language Models as evaluators to rank or score other models’ outputs by calibrating them against 20K human judgments across three text-generation tasks, five metrics, and eight languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation methods can be used to improve multilingual evaluation by calibrating them against 20K human judgments across three text-generation tasks, five metrics, and eight languages. |
Large Language Models for Generative Recommendation: A Survey and Visionary Discussions (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the field of natural language processing but are not fully able to leverage the generative power of LLM. |
| Approach: | They examine the progress, methods, and future directions of large language models . they examine what generative recommendation is, why RS should advance to generative recommendations . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach can be simplified to generate recommendations from the entire pool of items. |
T-Eval: Evaluating the Tool Utilization Capability of Large Language Models Step by Step (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Zehui Chen, Weihua Du, Wenwei Zhang, Kuikun Liu, Jiangning Liu, Miao Zheng, Jingming Zhuo, Songyang Zhang, Dahua Lin, Kai Chen, Feng Zhao
| Challenge: | Existing studies evaluate the tool utilization ability of large language models based on the final output or only consider the single-step tool calling. |
| Approach: | They propose a new approach to evaluate the tool utilization capability of large language models (LLMs) they decompose the tool usage into multiple sub-processes, including instruction following, planning, reasoning, retrieval, understanding, and review. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model exhibits consistency with the outcome-oriented evaluation and provides a more fine-grained analysis of the capabilities of LLMs. |