Agent-RewardBench: Towards a Unified Benchmark for Reward Modeling across Perception, Planning, and Safety in Real-World Multimodal Agents (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are developing but lack external feedback . there is no clear on how to select reward models for agents . |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate agent reward modeling ability in MLLMs . they use multiple dimensions and real-world agent scenarios evaluation . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates agent performance in multimodal large language models . it covers perception, planning, and safety with 7 scenarios and is highly difficult and high-quality . |
Similar Papers
Aligning Agents via Planning: A Benchmark for Trajectory-Level Reward Modeling (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve into agentic systems capable of autonomous tool invocation and complex reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a trajectory-level preference benchmark to evaluate judges' ability to distinguish preferred versus distractor agent trajectories in tool-integrated environments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates how well judges distinguish preferred versus distractor agent trajectories in complex tool-using scenarios. |
M-RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models in Multilingual Settings (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Srishti Gureja, Lester James Validad Miranda, Shayekh Bin Islam, Rishabh Maheshwary, Drishti Sharma, Gusti Triandi Winata, Nathan Lambert, Sebastian Ruder, Sara Hooker, Marzieh Fadaee
| Challenge: | Reward models (RMs) are primarily trained and evaluated in English and their capabilities in multilingual settings remain understudied. |
| Approach: | They construct a multilingual RM evaluation benchmark that tests the chat, safety, reasoning, and translation capabilities of RMs in 23 languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better for high-resource languages and improves with translation quality. |
AgencyBench: Benchmarking the Frontiers of Autonomous Agents in 1M-Token Real-World Contexts (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Keyu Li, Junhao Shi, Yang Xiao, Mohan Jiang, Jie Sun, Yunze Wu, Dayuan Fu, Shijie Xia, Xiaojie Cai, Tianze Xu, Weiye Si, Wenjie Li, Dequan Wang, Pengfei Liu
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on single agentic capability, failing to capture long-horizon real-world scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that evaluates 6 agentic capabilities across 32 real-world scenarios. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that closed-source models outperform open-source model (48.4% vs 32.1%) integrating models with advanced scaffolds to form autonomous agents is a paradigm shift. |
MLLM-Bench: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs with Per-sample Criteria (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Wentao Ge, Shunian Chen, Hardy Chen, Nuo Chen, Junying Chen, Zhihong Chen, Wenya Xie, Shuo Yan, ChenghaoZhu ChenghaoZhu, Ziyue Lin, Dingjie Song, Xidong Wang, Anningzhe Gao, Zhang Zhiyi, Jianquan Li, Xiang Wan, Benyou Wang
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methodologies for multimodal large language models are limited in evaluating objective queries without considering real-world user experiences. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate multimodal large language models with per-sample criteria using potent MLLM as the judge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation paradigm shows that it can be used to evaluate multimodal large language models with per-sample criteria. |
RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Nathan Lambert, Valentina Pyatkin, Jacob Morrison, Lester James Validad Miranda, Bill Yuchen Lin, Khyathi Chandu, Nouha Dziri, Sachin Kumar, Tom Zick, Yejin Choi, Noah A. Smith, Hannaneh Hajishirzi
| Challenge: | Evaluating reward models presents an opportunity to understand the opaque technologies used for alignment of language models. |
| Approach: | They present a benchmark dataset and code-base for evaluation of reward models . they use prompt-chosen-rejected trios to benchmark how they perform on queries . |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset compares RMs with other models on a set of questions. |
ToolRM: Towards Agentic Tool-Use Reward Modeling (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Renhao Li, Jianhong Tu, Yang Su, Yantao Liu, Fei Huang, Hamid Alinejad-Rokny, Derek F. Wong, Junyang Lin, Min Yang
| Challenge: | lack of reliable reward models for tool-use tasks has limited progress toward agentic AI . recent advances in agentic artificial intelligence are driven by tool-using capabilities of large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose a pipeline that constructs pairwise preference data using rule-based scoring and multidimensional sampling to build lightweight reward models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models on tool calling tasks with higher accuracy. |
Lost in Translation: Do LVLM Judges Generalize Across Languages? (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Mohammed Saidul Islam, Mir Tafseer Nayeem, Amran Bhuiyan, Mizanur Rahman, Shafiq Joty, Enamul Hoque, Jimmy Huang
| Challenge: | MM-JudgeBench is the first large-scale benchmark for multilingual and multimodal judge model evaluation. |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual benchmark for multilingual and multimodal judge model evaluation that includes over 60K pairwise preference instances spanning 25 typologically diverse languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark includes over 60K pairwise preference instances spanning 25 languages. |
CRAB: Cross-environment Agent Benchmark for Multimodal Language Model Agents (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Tianqi Xu, Linyao Chen, Dai-Jie Wu, Yanjun Chen, Zecheng Zhang, Xiang Yao, Zhiqiang Xie, Yongchao Chen, Shilong Liu, Bochen Qian, Anjie Yang, Zhaoxuan Jin, Jianbo Deng, Philip Torr, Bernard Ghanem, Guohao Li
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for MLM agents in interactive environments are limited by their focus on a single environment, lack of detailed and generalized evaluation methods, and the complexity of constructing tasks and evaluators. |
| Approach: | They propose a cross-environment agent benchmark framework that integrates graph-based evaluation and task generation methods. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework supports multiple devices and can be easily extended to any environment with a Python interface. |
MPBench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Reasoning Benchmark for Process Errors Identification (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
xu Zhao Pan, Pengfei Zhou, Jiaxin Ai, Wangbo Zhao, Kai Wang, Xiaojiang Peng, Wenqi Shao, Hongxun Yao, Kaipeng Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks of large language models focus on error detection, neglecting other scenarios like reasoning search. |
| Approach: | et al. propose a multi-task, multimodal benchmark to assess effectiveness of PRMs . step correctness, answers aggregation and reasoning process search are evaluated . ethical principles of MPBench are based on a set of evaluation paradigms based in a text-based benchmark . |
| Outcome: | a new benchmark assesses the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) in multiple scenarios . it uses three evaluation paradigms to assess the effectiveness and compares them with existing models . a the proposed model improves reasoning accuracy by providing stepwise feedback for multi-step reasoning results . |
MIBench: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models over Multiple Images (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Haowei Liu, Xi Zhang, Haiyang Xu, Yaya Shi, Chaoya Jiang, Ming Yan, Ji Zhang, Fei Huang, Chunfeng Yuan, Bing Li, Weiming Hu
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks and MLLMs focus on single-image input scenarios, leaving performance of ML models when handling multiple images underexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate fine-grained abilities of multimodal large language models in multi-image scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark categorizes the multi-image abilities into three scenarios: MII, MKS and MIC. |