FEA-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Repository-Level Code Generation for Feature Implementation (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Wei Li, Xin Zhang, Zhongxin Guo, Shaoguang Mao, Wen Luo, Guangyue Peng, Yangyu Huang, Houfeng Wang, Scarlett Li
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on standalone programming problems, such as HumanEval, MBPP, and LiveCodeBench. |
| Approach: | They propose to use large language models to evaluate their ability to perform incremental development within code repositories by collecting pull requests from 83 GitHub repositorias and using rule-based and intent-based filtering to construct task instances focused on new feature development. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that large language models perform significantly worse in the FEA-Bench, highlighting considerable challenges in repository-level incremental code development. |
Similar Papers
DI-BENCH: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Dependency Inference with Testable Repositories at Scale (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Linghao Zhang, Junhao Wang, Shilin He, Chaoyun Zhang, Yu Kang, Bowen Li, Jiaheng Wen, Chengxing Xie, Maoquan Wang, Yufan Huang, Elsie Nallipogu, Qingwei Lin, Yingnong Dang, Saravan Rajmohan, Dongmei Zhang, Qi Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing studies highlight that dependency-related issues cause over 40% of observed runtime errors on the generated repository. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale benchmark and evaluation framework specifically designed to assess LLMs’ capability on dependency inference. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves only a 48% execution pass rate on Python, indicating room for improvement. |
Turning the Tide: Repository-based Code Reflection (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Code large language models (LLMs) enhance programming by understanding and generating code across languages. |
| Approach: | a new benchmark evaluates code understanding and generation in repositories using code large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves code understanding and generation in repositories by evaluating 1,888 test cases across 6 programming languages. |
DependEval: Benchmarking LLMs for Repository Dependency Understanding (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a benchmark is designed to evaluate the repository-level dependency understanding of large language models (LLMs) based on 2683 repositories from real-world websites. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate repository dependency understanding for large language models . DEPENDEVAL evaluates models on three core tasks across 8 programming languages . |
| Outcome: | The benchmark evaluates models on three core tasks across 8 programming languages from real-world repositories. |
DevEval: A Manually-Annotated Code Generation Benchmark Aligned with Real-World Code Repositories (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Jia Li, Ge Li, Yunfei Zhao, Yongmin Li, Huanyu Liu, Hao Zhu, Lecheng Wang, Kaibo Liu, Zheng Fang, Lanshen Wang, Jiazheng Ding, Xuanming Zhang, Yuqi Zhu, Yihong Dong, Zhi Jin, Binhua Li, Fei Huang, Yongbin Li, Bin Gu, Mengfei Yang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks are poorly aligned with real-world code repositories and are insufficient to evaluate the coding abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a repository-level benchmark named DevEval to evaluate LLMs' coding abilities in real-world code repositories. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that the LLMs perform better in real-world code repositories than existing benchmarks. |
The BiGGen Bench: A Principled Benchmark for Fine-grained Evaluation of Language Models with Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Seungone Kim, Juyoung Suk, Ji Yong Cho, Shayne Longpre, Chaeeun Kim, Dongkeun Yoon, Guijin Son, Yejin Cho, Sheikh Shafayat, Jinheon Baek, Sue Hyun Park, Hyeonbin Hwang, Jinkyung Jo, Hyowon Cho, Haebin Shin, Seongyun Lee, Hanseok Oh, Noah Lee, Namgyu Ho, Se June Joo, Miyoung Ko, Yoonjoo Lee, Hyungjoo Chae, Jamin Shin, Joel Jang, Seonghyeon Ye, Bill Yuchen Lin, Sean Welleck, Graham Neubig, Moontae Lee, Kyungjae Lee, Minjoon Seo
| Challenge: | a recent study evaluated language models using abstract evaluation criteria that lack the flexibility and granularity of human assessment. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate nine distinct language models' capabilities . they use instance-specific evaluation criteria to mirror human evaluation . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates nine distinct capabilities of language models across 77 tasks. |
SUPER: Evaluating Agents on Setting Up and Executing Tasks from Research Repositories (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Ben Bogin, Kejuan Yang, Shashank Gupta, Kyle Richardson, Erin Bransom, Peter Clark, Ashish Sabharwal, Tushar Khot
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant progress in writing code, but can they be used to reproduce results from research repositories? |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the capability of Large Language Models to reproduce results from research repositories. |
| Outcome: | The benchmark aims to capture the realistic challenges faced by researchers working with machine learning and natural language processing repositories. |
Can Language Models Replace Programmers for Coding? REPOCOD Says ‘Not Yet’ (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for code generation use short completions, synthetic examples, or focus on limited scale repositories, failing to represent real-world coding tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a Python code-generation benchmark that contains 980 whole-function generation tasks with realistic dependencies from 11 popular projects. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks are short completions, synthetic examples, or focus on limited scale repositories, failing to represent real-world coding tasks. |
DA-Code: Agent Data Science Code Generation Benchmark for Large Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Yiming Huang, Jianwen Luo, Yan Yu, Yitong Zhang, Fangyu Lei, Yifan Wei, Shizhu He, Lifu Huang, Xiao Liu, Jun Zhao, Kang Liu
| Challenge: | DA-Code is a code generation benchmark designed to assess LLMs on agent-based data science tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a code generation benchmark specifically designed for LLMs on agent-based data science tasks. |
| Outcome: | The benchmark performs better than existing frameworks, but lacks accuracy . it is based on real-world data, and includes examples that cover a wide range of tasks . |
A.S.E: A Repository-Level Benchmark for Evaluating Security in AI-Generated Code (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Keke Lian, Wang Bin, Lei Zhang, Libo Chen, Junjie Wang, Ziming Zhao, Yujiu Yang, Miaoqian Lin, Haotong Duan, Haoran Zhao, Shuang Liao, Mingda Guo, Quan Jiazheng, Yilu Zhong, Chenhao He, Chen Zichuan, Jie Wu, Haoling Li, Zhaoxuan Li, Jiongchi Yu, Hui LI, Dong Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing security evaluation benchmarks lack relevance to real-world AI programming tasks . current LLMs struggle with secure coding, research shows . |
| Approach: | They propose a repository-level evaluation benchmark to assess security of AI-generated code. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework mirrors real-world AI programming tasks and offers valuable insights into the state of AI code generation. |
KoCo-Bench: Can Large Language Models Leverage Domain Knowledge in Software Development? (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Xue Jiang, Ge Li, Jiaru Qian, Xianjie Shi, Chenjie Li, Hao Zhu, Ziyu Wang, Jielun Zhang, Zeyu Zhao, Kechi Zhang, Jia Li, Wenpin Jiao, Zhi Jin, Yihong Dong
| Challenge: | Existing domain-specific code benchmarks focus on assessing what knowledge LLMs possess rather than how they acquire and apply new knowledge. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate domain specialization methods in real-world software development. |
| Outcome: | KOCO-bench is a new benchmark for evaluating domain specialization methods in real-world software development. |