Papers by Scarlett Li
Value Compass Benchmarks: A Comprehensive, Generative and Self-Evolving Platform for LLMs’ Value Evaluation (2025.acl-demo)
Copied to clipboard
Jing Yao, Xiaoyuan Yi, Shitong Duan, Jindong Wang, Yuzhuo Bai, Muhua Huang, Yang Ou, Scarlett Li, Peng Zhang, Tun Lu, Zhicheng Dou, Maosong Sun, James Evans, Xing Xie
| Challenge: | Current evaluation methods for large language models face two key challenges: 1. evaluation validity and 2. Result interpretation reduce the pluralistic and incommensurable values to one-dimensional scores. |
| Approach: | They propose a platform for comprehensive value diagnosis of large language models (LLMs) that provides a generative evaluation paradigm that automatically creates real-world test items co-evolving with ever-advancing LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed platform provides a framework for comprehensive value diagnosis of large language models (LLMs) with fine-grained scores and case studies across 27 value dimensions for 33 leading LLMs, customized comparisons, and visualized analysis of LLM’s alignment with cultural values. |
Demystifying Data Organization for Enhanced LLM Training (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yalun Dai, Yangyu Huang, Tongshen Yang, Yonghan Wang, Xin Zhang, Wenshan Wu, Qihao Zhao, Hao Li, Yuanyuan Gao, Kim-Hui Yap, Scarlett Li
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized various fields, yet their training efficiency is heavily reliant on effective data curation. |
| Approach: | They propose to reuse pre-computed sample-level scores originally generated for data efficiency and introduce two new data ordering methods to improve LLM training. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve the stability and performance of LLM training. |
FEA-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Repository-Level Code Generation for Feature Implementation (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Wei Li, Xin Zhang, Zhongxin Guo, Shaoguang Mao, Wen Luo, Guangyue Peng, Yangyu Huang, Houfeng Wang, Scarlett Li
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on standalone programming problems, such as HumanEval, MBPP, and LiveCodeBench. |
| Approach: | They propose to use large language models to evaluate their ability to perform incremental development within code repositories by collecting pull requests from 83 GitHub repositorias and using rule-based and intent-based filtering to construct task instances focused on new feature development. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that large language models perform significantly worse in the FEA-Bench, highlighting considerable challenges in repository-level incremental code development. |
MMLU-CF: A Contamination-free Multi-task Language Understanding Benchmark (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Qihao Zhao, Yangyu Huang, Tengchao Lv, Lei Cui, Qinzheng Sun, Shaoguang Mao, Xin Zhang, Ying Xin, Qiufeng Yin, Scarlett Li, Furu Wei
| Challenge: | Multiple-choice question datasets like Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU) have inevitably led to benchmark contamination, resulting in unreliable evaluation. |
| Approach: | They propose a contamination-free MCQ benchmark called MMLU-CF which reassesses LLMs’ understanding of world knowledge by averting both unintentional and malicious data contamination. |
| Outcome: | The proposed MMLU-CF reassesses LLMs’ understanding of world knowledge by averting both unintentional and malicious data contamination. |
Teaching Your Models to Understand Code via Focal Preference Alignment (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Jie Wu, Haoling Li, Xin Zhang, Xiao Liu, Yangyu Huang, Jianwen Luo, Yizhen Zhang, Zuchao Li, Ruihang Chu, Yujiu Yang, Scarlett Li
| Challenge: | Existing methods for supervised fine-tuning focus on unit test feedback to construct preference pairs. |
| Approach: | They propose a preference alignment framework that mimics human iterative debugging to refine Code LLMs. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that Preference Learning improves on BigCodeBench and BigCodeBind tasks. |