Can LLMs Simulate L2-English Dialogue? An Information-Theoretic Analysis of L1-Dependent Biases (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Rena Wei Gao, Xuetong Wu, Tatsuki Kuribayashi, Mingrui Ye, Siya Qi, Carsten Roever, Yuanxing Liu, Zheng Yuan, Jey Han Lau
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) can simulate non-native-like English use observed in human second language (L2) learners interfered with by their native first language (N1) knowledge. |
| Approach: | They use large language models to simulate non-native-like English use observed in human second language (L2) learners, and then compare their outputs to real L2 learner data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models replicate L1-dependent patterns observed in human second language (L2) learners, with distinct influences from various languages. |
Similar Papers
Real or Robotic? Assessing Whether LLMs Accurately Simulate Qualities of Human Responses in Human-LLM Dialogue (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Jonathan Ivey, Shivani Kumar, Jiayu Liu, Hua Shen, Sushrita Rakshit, Rohan Raju, Haotian Zhang, Aparna Ananthasubramaniam, Junghwan Kim, Bowen Yi, Dustin Wright, Abraham Israeli, Anders Giovanni Møller, Lechen Zhang, David Jurgens
| Challenge: | Recent work has sought to use large language models to simulate human-human and human-LLM interactions. |
| Approach: | They use a large-scale dataset to generate a paired LLM-LLM and human-LLm dialogues from the WildChat dataset and quantify how well they align with their human counterparts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models perform similarly in simulating English, Chinese, and Russian dialogues. |
Systematic Biases in LLM Simulations of Debates (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current research suggests that LLM-based agents become increasingly human-like in their performance, sparking interest in using these AI agents as substitutes for human participants in behavioral studies. |
| Approach: | They propose to use LLMs to simulate political debates on topics that are important aspects of people’s day-to-day lives and decision-making processes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can simulate political debates on topics that are important aspects of people’s day-to-day lives and decision-making processes. |
Do LLMs Overcome Shortcut Learning? An Evaluation of Shortcut Challenges in Large Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in various tasks, but may rely on dataset biases as shortcuts for prediction. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a test suite to evaluate the impact of shortcuts on LLMs' performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed test suite incorporates six shortcut types, five evaluation metrics, and four prompting strategies. |
Large Language Models Are Partially Primed in Pronoun Interpretation (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies suggest large language models acquire rich linguistic representations, but little is known about whether they adapt to linguistic biases in a human-like way. |
| Approach: | They examine whether large language models display human-like referential biases using stimuli and procedures from real psycholinguistic experiments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models display human-like referential biases when exposed to referential patterns in the local context. |
Do Large Language Models have an English Accent? Evaluating and Improving the Naturalness of Multilingual LLMs (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current Large Language Models (LLMs) are predominantly designed with English as the primary language, but many are still English-dominated. |
| Approach: | They propose to use automatic corpus-level metrics to assess lexical and syntactic naturalness of LLMs in a multilingual context. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves naturalness of LLMs in target languages without compromising performance on general-purpose benchmarks. |
Toward Beginner-Friendly LLMs for Language Learning: Controlling Difficulty in Conversation (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Practicing conversations with large language models is a promising alternative to traditional in-person language learning. |
| Approach: | They propose a new token-level evaluation metric, Token Miss Rate, that measures the proportion of incomprehensible tokens per utterance and correlates strongly with human judgments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve comprehensibility for beginner speakers from 39.4% to 83.3%, compared with prompting alone and a token-level evaluation metric, Token Miss Rate (TMR). |
Bias in the Mirror : Are LLMs opinions robust to their own adversarial attacks (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on large language models lacks robustness, highlighting the limitations of such models. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel approach where two LLMs engage in self-debate to persuade a neutral version of the model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach examines whether large language models are robust during interactions and whether they are susceptible to reinforcing misinformation or shifting to harmful viewpoints. |
7 Points to Tsinghua but 10 Points to ? Assessing Large Language Models in Agentic Multilingual National Bias (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models have garnered significant attention for their capabilities in multilingual natural language processing, but studies on risks associated with cross biases are limited to immediate context preferences. |
| Approach: | They investigate multilingual bias in state-of-the-art Large Language Models by analyzing their responses to decision-making tasks across multiple languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can provide personalized advice across university applications, travel, and relocation scenarios. |
Don’t Trust ChatGPT when your Question is not in English: A Study of Multilingual Abilities and Types of LLMs (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have shown that large language models can perform a wide variety of language tasks when presented in English. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to evaluate the multilingual capabilities of large language models using a prompt back-translation method to find out how LLMs acquire their multilingual abilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method shows that large language models can transfer learned knowledge across different languages, but struggle to provide accurate results in translation-variant tasks. |
Biasless Language Models Learn Unnaturally: How LLMs Fail to Distinguish the Possible from the Impossible (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | linguists have discovered patterns which hold across virtually all known natural languages . lingulists are able to learn languages by comparing their learning curves to those of humans . |
| Approach: | They compare LLM learning curves on existing and "impossible" datasets . they find that GPT-2 learns each language and its impossible counterpart equally easily . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model learns each language and its impossible counterpart equally easily, the study shows . the study also shows that the proposed model does not provide any kind of separation between the possible and the impossible . |