Papers by Sushrita Rakshit
KODIS: A Multicultural Dispute Resolution Dialogue Corpus (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | KODIS is a dyadic dispute resolution corpus containing thousands of dialogues from over 75 countries. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a dyadic dispute resolution corpus to examine how conflicts escalate through conversation rather than deal-making. |
| Outcome: | The proposed corpus contains thousands of dialogues from over 75 countries. |
Real or Robotic? Assessing Whether LLMs Accurately Simulate Qualities of Human Responses in Human-LLM Dialogue (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Jonathan Ivey, Shivani Kumar, Jiayu Liu, Hua Shen, Sushrita Rakshit, Rohan Raju, Haotian Zhang, Aparna Ananthasubramaniam, Junghwan Kim, Bowen Yi, Dustin Wright, Abraham Israeli, Anders Giovanni Møller, Lechen Zhang, David Jurgens
| Challenge: | Recent work has sought to use large language models to simulate human-human and human-LLM interactions. |
| Approach: | They use a large-scale dataset to generate a paired LLM-LLM and human-LLm dialogues from the WildChat dataset and quantify how well they align with their human counterparts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models perform similarly in simulating English, Chinese, and Russian dialogues. |
Causally Modeling the Linguistic and Social Factors that Predict Email Response (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yinuo Xu, Hong Chen, Sushrita Rakshit, Aparna Ananthasubramaniam, Omkar Yadav, Mingqian Zheng, Michael Jiang, Lechen Zhang, Bowen Yi, Kenan Alkiek, Abraham Israeli, Bangzhao Shu, Hua Shen, Jiaxin Pei, Haotian Zhang, Miriam Schirmer, David Jurgens
| Challenge: | a key intent behind many emails is to get a reply from the recipient. |
| Approach: | They propose to model the intents, expectations, and responsiveness in email exchanges by using a dataset containing 1800 emails annotated with nuanced types of intents and expectations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on 1800 emails annotated with nuanced types of intents and expectations . it shows that social status, argumentation, and strength of social connection influence email response rates . |