Challenge: Existing studies suggest large language models acquire rich linguistic representations, but little is known about whether they adapt to linguistic biases in a human-like way.
Approach: They examine whether large language models display human-like referential biases using stimuli and procedures from real psycholinguistic experiments.
Outcome: The proposed models display human-like referential biases when exposed to referential patterns in the local context.

Similar Papers

Systematic Biases in LLM Simulations of Debates (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Current research suggests that LLM-based agents become increasingly human-like in their performance, sparking interest in using these AI agents as substitutes for human participants in behavioral studies.
Approach: They propose to use LLMs to simulate political debates on topics that are important aspects of people’s day-to-day lives and decision-making processes.
Outcome: The proposed model can simulate political debates on topics that are important aspects of people’s day-to-day lives and decision-making processes.
Large Language Models: The Need for Nuance in Current Debates and a Pragmatic Perspective on Understanding (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Current Large Language Models (LLMs) are unparalleled in their ability to generate grammatically correct, fluent text.
Approach: They argue that LLMs only parrot statistical patterns in training data and that language learning in LLM cannot inform human language learning.
Outcome: The proposed model can generate grammatically correct, fluent text without requiring human intervention.
Leveraging Human Production-Interpretation Asymmetries to Test LLM Cognitive Plausibility (2025.acl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing research on the linguistic capabilities of large language models has focused on their performance in language interpretation.
Approach: They examine whether large language models (LLMs) process language similarly to humans . they use an empirically documented asymmetry between production and interpretation in humans a testbed .
Outcome: The proposed model can replicate human-like distinctions between production and interpretation.
Can LLMs Simulate L2-English Dialogue? An Information-Theoretic Analysis of L1-Dependent Biases (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) can simulate non-native-like English use observed in human second language (L2) learners interfered with by their native first language (N1) knowledge.
Approach: They use large language models to simulate non-native-like English use observed in human second language (L2) learners, and then compare their outputs to real L2 learner data.
Outcome: The proposed models replicate L1-dependent patterns observed in human second language (L2) learners, with distinct influences from various languages.
Language Adaptation of Large Language Models: An Empirical Study on LLaMA2 (2025.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Popularity of Large Language Models (LLMs) has seen a skyrocketing increase in recent years.
Approach: They present a systematic review of the language adaptation process for Large Language Models including vocabulary expansion, continued pre-training, and instruction fine-tuning.
Outcome: The proposed model is based on empirical studies conducted on LLaMA2 and discussions on various settings affecting the model's capabilities.
7 Points to Tsinghua but 10 Points to ? Assessing Large Language Models in Agentic Multilingual National Bias (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models have garnered significant attention for their capabilities in multilingual natural language processing, but studies on risks associated with cross biases are limited to immediate context preferences.
Approach: They investigate multilingual bias in state-of-the-art Large Language Models by analyzing their responses to decision-making tasks across multiple languages.
Outcome: The proposed model can provide personalized advice across university applications, travel, and relocation scenarios.
Biasless Language Models Learn Unnaturally: How LLMs Fail to Distinguish the Possible from the Impossible (2026.eacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: linguists have discovered patterns which hold across virtually all known natural languages . lingulists are able to learn languages by comparing their learning curves to those of humans .
Approach: They compare LLM learning curves on existing and "impossible" datasets . they find that GPT-2 learns each language and its impossible counterpart equally easily .
Outcome: The proposed model learns each language and its impossible counterpart equally easily, the study shows . the study also shows that the proposed model does not provide any kind of separation between the possible and the impossible .
Cognitive Effects and Biases in Large Language Models (2026.eacl-tutorials)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: This tutorial bridges psychology and NLP to clarify cognitive effects and biases in large language models.
Approach: This tutorial bridges psychology and NLP to clarify cognitive effects and biases in large language models.
Outcome: This tutorial bridges psychology and NLP to clarify cognitive effects and biases in large language models.
Who is better at math, Jenny or Jingzhen? Uncovering Stereotypes in Large Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing research on stereotypes in large language models is limited and focuses on African Ameri- F.
Approach: They propose to use global bias to probe a set of large language models via perplexity to determine how certain stereotypes are represented in the model's internal representations.
Outcome: The proposed model amplifys harmful stereotypes and shows that the demographic groups associated with stereotypes remain consistent across model likelihoods and outputs.
The LLM Effect: Are Humans Truly Using LLMs, or Are They Being Influenced By Them Instead? (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models have shown capabilities close to human performance in various analytical tasks.
Approach: They investigate the efficiency and accuracy of Large Language Models in specialized tasks . they integrate LLMs with expert annotators to observe the impact of LLM suggestions .
Outcome: The proposed model improves task completion speed but introduces anchoring bias . the proposed model is not suitable for open-ended analysis, but is capable of handling specialized tasks.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations