Evaluating the Elementary Multilingual Capabilities of Large Language Models with MultiQ (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a global majority of non-English speakers are underrepresented by large language models . however, most open LLMs are limited in their language coverage . |
| Approach: | They propose a silver standard benchmark for basic open-ended question answering with 27.4k test questions across a typologically diverse set of 137 languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can answer questions in 27.4k questions across 137 languages. |
Similar Papers
Don’t Trust ChatGPT when your Question is not in English: A Study of Multilingual Abilities and Types of LLMs (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have shown that large language models can perform a wide variety of language tasks when presented in English. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to evaluate the multilingual capabilities of large language models using a prompt back-translation method to find out how LLMs acquire their multilingual abilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method shows that large language models can transfer learned knowledge across different languages, but struggle to provide accurate results in translation-variant tasks. |
Can Multiple-choice Questions Really Be Useful in Detecting the Abilities of LLMs? (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are widely used in the evaluation of large language models (LLMs) however, there are concerns about whether MCQ can truly measure LLM’s capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose to use multiple choice questions to evaluate large language models (LLMs) to assess their capabilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods show that MCQs are less reliable than LFGQs in terms of expected calibration error. |
Is Translation All You Need? A Study on Solving Multilingual Tasks with Large Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated multilingual capabilities, yet they are mostly English-centric due to the imbalanced training corpora. |
| Approach: | They extend the evaluation to real-world user queries and non-English-centric LLMs . they show that translation into English can boost LLM performance on NLP tasks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation extends to user queries and non-English-centric LLMs . it shows that translation into English can boost performance on NLP tasks, but not universally optimal . |
Do Large Language Models have an English Accent? Evaluating and Improving the Naturalness of Multilingual LLMs (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current Large Language Models (LLMs) are predominantly designed with English as the primary language, but many are still English-dominated. |
| Approach: | They propose to use automatic corpus-level metrics to assess lexical and syntactic naturalness of LLMs in a multilingual context. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves naturalness of LLMs in target languages without compromising performance on general-purpose benchmarks. |
Multi-LMentry: Can Multilingual LLMs Solve Elementary Tasks Across Languages? (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Luca Moroni, Javier Aula-Blasco, Simone Conia, Irene Baucells, Naiara Perez, Silvia Paniagua Suárez, Anna Sallés, Malte Ostendorff, Júlia Falcão, Guijin Son, Aitor Gonzalez-Agirre, Roberto Navigli, Marta Villegas
| Challenge: | a recent study focused on complex, high-level tasks, but LMentry is limited to English . a multilingual evaluation of large language models is needed to address this gap, authors say . |
| Approach: | They propose a compact benchmark that enables systematic evaluation of large language models . they propose to use tasks that are trivial for humans but remain surprisingly difficult for LLMs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark is limited to English, leaving its insights linguistically narrow. |
LLMs for Low Resource Languages in Multilingual, Multimodal and Dialectal Settings (2024.eacl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in AI can be attributed to the remarkable performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) success of LLMs depends on specific training techniques, such as instruction tuning and prompting . |
| Approach: | They explore the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in various tasks and languages . they also examine their performance, fine-tuning, instructions tuning, and close vs. open models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be used for speech and multimodal tasks across modalities, languages, and dialects. |
How Accurate Are LLMs at Multi-Question Answering on Conversational Transcripts? (2025.emnlp-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are used for question answering over long contexts . high computational costs and latency hinder the process . |
| Approach: | They explore the capabilities of Large Language Models to answer multiple questions based on the same conversational context. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models outperform proprietary and public models in question answering . their results show that they can be cost-effective and transparent . |
Multilingual Large Language Models Are Not (Yet) Code-Switchers (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing multilingual Large Language Models are not specifically trained with objectives for managing code-switching scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose to use multilingual Large Language Models to perform sentiment analysis, machine translation, summarization and word-level language identification to compare their performance to fine-tuned models of much smaller scales. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models show that they underperform in comparison to fine-tuned models of much smaller scales. |
Polyglots or Multitudes? Multilingual LLM Answers to Value-laden Multiple-Choice Questions (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are used to assess knowledge, reasoning abilities, and even values encoded in large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose to test whether multilingual LLMs are consistent in their responses across languages . they also use human-translated questions aligned in 8 European languages to test their robustness . |
| Outcome: | The proposed corpus of questions is aligned in 8 European languages and compared with previous studies. |
Getting More from Less: Large Language Models are Good Spontaneous Multilingual Learners (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Shimao Zhang, Changjiang Gao, Wenhao Zhu, Jiajun Chen, Xin Huang, Xue Han, Junlan Feng, Chao Deng, Shujian Huang
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive language capabilities, but most of them have very unbalanced performance across different languages. |
| Approach: | They propose to use question translation data to enhance LLMs' multilingual capabilities by using mechanistic interpretability methods. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves multilingual alignment even with unannotated answers in English and a wide range of languages even with instruction-tuned LLMs. |