Papers by Yuhui Liu

11 papers
MAKAR: a Multi-Agent framework based Knowledge-Augmented Reasoning for Grounded Multimodal Named Entity Recognition (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for GMNER fail to address semantic ambiguity caused by polysemy and long-tail distribution of datasets.
Approach: They propose a framework for Grounded Multimodal Named Entity Recognition that leverages a Multimodal Large Language Model to address semantic ambiguity.
Outcome: Extensive experiments show that the proposed framework outperforms existing methods on two benchmark datasets.
RAFFLES: Reasoning-based Attribution of Faults for LLM Systems (2026.eacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation frameworks focus on simple metrics and end-to-end outcomes, but they struggle with longer contexts.
Approach: They propose an offline evaluation architecture that incorporates iterative reasoning to evaluate the quality of the candidate faults and rationales of the Judge.
Outcome: The proposed architecture outperforms baseline evaluation frameworks with two datasets to identify step-level faults in multi-agent systems and ReasonEval datasets.
NegVQA: Can Vision Language Models Understand Negation? (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: NegVQA is a visual question answering (VQA) benchmark consisting of 7,379 two-choice questions covering diverse negation scenarios and image-question distributions.
Approach: They propose a visual question answering benchmark consisting of 7,379 two-choice questions covering diverse negation scenarios and image-question distributions.
Outcome: The proposed model fails to correctly interpret negation, leading to critical errors in interactive AI systems.
LLMEval-Fair: A Large-Scale Longitudinal Study on Robust and Fair Evaluation of Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation of Large Language Models on static benchmarks is vulnerable to data contamination and leaderboard overfitting.
Approach: LLMEval-Fair framework provides a framework for dynamic evaluation of Large Language Models . evaluators use a proprietary bank of 220k graduate-level questions to analyze model data .
Outcome: LLMEval-Fair provides robust and credible evaluation framework for Large Language Models . it provides a strong empirical validation for the dynamic evaluation paradigm .
Eureka: Neural Insight Learning for Knowledge Graph Reasoning (2022.coling-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing knowledge embedding methods have limited performance on knowledge graph reasoning tasks . eureka is empowered to learn seen relations with sufficient training triples .
Approach: They propose a neural insight learning framework called Eureka to bridge the “seen” to “unsea” gap . Eureca is empowered to learn seen relations with sufficient training triples while providing flexibility to learn unseen relations given only one trigger .
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms state-of-the-art models on seen and unseen relations . it can learn seen and unseen relationships with sufficient training triples .
Not All Experts are Equal: Efficient Expert Pruning and Skipping for Mixture-of-Experts Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) LLMs achieve higher performance with fewer active parameters, but are still difficult to deploy due to their immense parameter sizes.
Approach: They propose expert-level sparsification techniques to enhance the deployment efficiency of large language models by introducing plug-and-play expert pruning and skipping techniques.
Outcome: The proposed methods reduce model sizes and increase inference speed while maintaining satisfactory performance across a wide range of tasks.
Chain-of-Talkers (CoTalk): Fast Human Annotation of Dense Image Captions (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches for optimizing human annotation efforts are limited . et al., 2015) suggest that densely annotated image captions improve vision-language alignment .
Approach: They propose an AI-in-the-loop methodology to maximize the number of annotated samples and improve their comprehensiveness under fixed budget constraints.
Outcome: The proposed method improves annotation speed and retrieval performance over the parallel method.
LLMEval-Med: A Real-world Clinical Benchmark for Medical LLMs with Physician Validation (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Current medical benchmarks have limitations in question design, data sources and evaluation methods.
Approach: They propose a new benchmark covering five core medical areas . it includes 2,996 questions created from real-world electronic health records .
Outcome: The proposed model covers five core medical areas and includes 2,996 questions created from real-world electronic health records and expert-designed clinical scenarios.
OAgents: An Empirical Study of Building Effective Agents (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a recent study shows that agent research practices are far from standard, rigorous . lack of a standard evaluation protocol makes previous works not reproducible, authors say .
Approach: They conduct an empirical study on the GAIA benchmark to investigate agent design choices . they find that lack of a standard evaluation protocol makes previous works not reproducible .
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art performance among open-source projects.
Data or Language Supervision: What Makes CLIP Better than DINO? (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: CLIP outperforms self-supervised models like DINO as vision encoders for vision-language models (VLMs) but it remains unclear whether this advantage stems from CLIP’s language supervision or its much larger training data.
Approach: Embedding analysis shows CLIP captures high-level semantics while DINO is more responsive to low-level features like colors and styles.
Outcome: Embedding analysis shows that CLIP captures high-level semantics, while DINO is more responsive to low-level features like colors and styles.
EquiBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models’ Reasoning about Program Semantics via Equivalence Checking (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: EquiBench is a new benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to reason about program semantics . Unlike natural language, code is executable.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate large language models through equivalence checking . EquiBench consists of 2400 program pairs across four languages and six categories .
Outcome: The proposed benchmark consists of 2400 program pairs across four languages and six categories.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations