Papers by Ludwig Schmidt

5 papers
Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Models (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a language model can correctly answer all sub-problems but not generate the overall solution.
Approach: They propose a method that asks itself and then answers follow-up questions to narrow the compositionality gap by reasoning explicitly instead of implicitly.
Outcome: The proposed method improves on chain of thought by asking itself and answering follow-up questions.
Exploring The Landscape of Distributional Robustness for Question Answering Models (2022.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for predicting distributional robustness fail to generalize reliably in a variety of test conditions.
Approach: They conduct a large empirical evaluation to investigate the landscape of distributional robustness in question answering.
Outcome: The proposed methods are more robust to distribution shifts than fully fine-tuned models, and few-shot prompt models exhibit better robustness than few- shot prompt models.
Better Alignment with Instruction Back-and-Forth Translation (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: et al., 2023) proposes a method to improve instruction-tuning data . e.g., we generate synthetic instructions using the backtranslation approach .
Approach: They propose a method to improve instruction-tuning data using web-based inputs . they generate synthetic instructions using the backtranslation approach and filter the generated data .
Outcome: The proposed method improves the quality of instruction-tuning data based on preprocessed texts . it yields better AlpacaEval win rates than direct distillation .
Beyond a Single Extractor: Re-thinking HTML-to-Text Extraction for LLM Pre-training (2026.findings-eacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing open-source datasets predominantly apply a single fixed extractor to all webpages.
Approach: They propose to take a Union over different extractors to improve model performance . they show that extractor choice can significantly impact downstream task performance based on content type .
Outcome: The proposed approach can increase the token yield of DCLM-Baseline by 71% while maintaining benchmark performance.
Data or Language Supervision: What Makes CLIP Better than DINO? (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: CLIP outperforms self-supervised models like DINO as vision encoders for vision-language models (VLMs) but it remains unclear whether this advantage stems from CLIP’s language supervision or its much larger training data.
Approach: Embedding analysis shows CLIP captures high-level semantics while DINO is more responsive to low-level features like colors and styles.
Outcome: Embedding analysis shows that CLIP captures high-level semantics, while DINO is more responsive to low-level features like colors and styles.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations