Papers by Saad Mahamood
A Needle in a Haystack: An Analysis of High-Agreement Workers on MTurk for Summarization (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Lining Zhang, Simon Mille, Yufang Hou, Daniel Deutsch, Elizabeth Clark, Yixin Liu, Saad Mahamood, Sebastian Gehrmann, Miruna Clinciu, Khyathi Raghavi Chandu, João Sedoc
| Challenge: | Using crowdsourcing, it is difficult to obtain high-quality annotations for difficult tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a recruitment pipeline to recruit high-quality Amazon Mechanical Turk workers . they filter out subpar workers before they carry out the evaluations . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can filter out subpar workers before they carry out evaluations and obtain high-agreement annotations with similar constraints on resources. |
On the Role of Summary Content Units in Text Summarization Evaluation (2024.naacl-short)
Copied to clipboard
Marcel Nawrath, Agnieszka Nowak, Tristan Ratz, Danilo Walenta, Juri Opitz, Leonardo Ribeiro, João Sedoc, Daniel Deutsch, Simon Mille, Yixin Liu, Sebastian Gehrmann, Lining Zhang, Saad Mahamood, Miruna Clinciu, Khyathi Chandu, Yufang Hou
| Challenge: | a human written summary content unit (SCU) is used to judge the quality of a summary . a pyramid evaluation method is based on SCUs that decompose a reference summary into concise sentences . |
| Approach: | They propose to use automated SCUs to evaluate the quality of a candidate summary . they propose to generate SCU approximations from AMR meaning representations and large language models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can be fully automated, but lacks the human effort to validate it. |
GEMv2: Multilingual NLG Benchmarking in a Single Line of Code (2022.emnlp-demos)
Copied to clipboard
Sebastian Gehrmann, Abhik Bhattacharjee, Abinaya Mahendiran, Alex Wang, Alexandros Papangelis, Aman Madaan, Angelina Mcmillan-major, Anna Shvets, Ashish Upadhyay, Bernd Bohnet, Bingsheng Yao, Bryan Wilie, Chandra Bhagavatula, Chaobin You, Craig Thomson, Cristina Garbacea, Dakuo Wang, Daniel Deutsch, Deyi Xiong, Di Jin, Dimitra Gkatzia, Dragomir Radev, Elizabeth Clark, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Filip Ginter, Genta Indra Winata, Hendrik Strobelt, Hiroaki Hayashi, Jekaterina Novikova, Jenna Kanerva, Jenny Chim, Jiawei Zhou, Jordan Clive, Joshua Maynez, João Sedoc, Juraj Juraska, Kaustubh Dhole, Khyathi Raghavi Chandu, Laura Perez Beltrachini, Leonardo F . R. Ribeiro, Lewis Tunstall, Li Zhang, Mahim Pushkarna, Mathias Creutz, Michael White, Mihir Sanjay Kale, Moussa Kamal Eddine, Nico Daheim, Nishant Subramani, Ondrej Dusek, Paul Pu Liang, Pawan Sasanka Ammanamanchi, Qi Zhu, Ratish Puduppully, Reno Kriz, Rifat Shahriyar, Ronald Cardenas, Saad Mahamood, Salomey Osei, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Sanja Štajner, Sebastien Montella, Shailza Jolly, Simon Mille, Tahmid Hasan, Tianhao Shen, Tosin Adewumi, Vikas Raunak, Vipul Raheja, Vitaly Nikolaev, Vivian Tsai, Yacine Jernite, Ying Xu, Yisi Sang, Yixin Liu, Yufang Hou
| Challenge: | Evaluations in machine learning rarely use the latest metrics, datasets, or human evaluation in favor of remaining compatible with prior work. |
| Approach: | They propose to use the Generation, Evaluation, and Metrics Benchmark to integrate new evaluation methods into existing evaluations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation infrastructure bridges the gap between the advantages of leaderboards and in-depth and evolving evaluations by allowing model developers to benefit from each other's work. |
Real-World Summarization: When Evaluation Reaches Its Limits (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study examines the evaluation of hotel highlights in the context of hotel data. |
| Approach: | They examine evaluation of faithfulness to input data in the context of hotel highlights . they compare traditional metrics, trainable methods, and LLM-as-a-judge approaches . |
| Outcome: | The results show that simple metrics outperform human judgments on LLM-generated summaries . the results also highlight challenges in crowdsourced evaluations. |
Lessons from a User Experience Evaluation of NLP Interfaces (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Increasingly, questions are being asked on whether evaluations are reproducible and repeatable. |
| Approach: | They propose to design user interfaces that are more consistent and reproducible . only a minority of published experiments can be reproduced due to non-working code or resource limits . |
| Outcome: | The proposed UIs are based on standardized human-centered interaction principles and are evaluated by four experts. |